Cognition numérique : plus ou moins
English
Share
Overview
Source : Laboratoires de Nicholaus mimine et Judith Danovitch — Université de Louisville
Un des objectifs du système éducatif moderne consiste à enseigner aux enfants culture mathématique. Ils apprennent à ajouter, soustraire, multiplier et diviser, et cette base de connaissances sert à appuyer l’apprentissage de la géométrie, algèbre, calcul, physique et les statistiques. Enfants d’âge scolaire généralement acquièrent ces compétences dans des cadres éducatifs formels, mais le fondement de la compréhension mathématique est développé beaucoup plus tôt dans la vie.
Comme les enfants, les humains commencent à se former des représentations rugueuses qui leur permettent de porter des jugements sur le nombre, et peut-être le premier concept numérique qui développent les êtres humains est l’idée de moins par rapport à plus. Cependant, ces concepts de sondage peut être difficile, parce que même si les bébés ont une idée du nombre, ils ont très peu de moyens de montrer ce qu’ils savent. Ce qu’ils peuvent faire, c’est ramper, manger, pleurer et dormir. Ainsi, les chercheurs ont développé une tâche à l’aide de cet ensemble limité de réponses pour étudier si les bébés peuvent représenter mentalement nombre.
Cette expérience montre comment les chercheurs utiliser créativement alimentaire afin d’étudier les concepts de la cognition numérique chez les nourrissons à l’aide de la méthode de Feigenson, Carey et Hauser. 1
Procedure
Results
In order to see significant results, researchers would have to test at least 16 infants in each condition, not including infants dropped for failing to complete the task. Infants presented with 1 vs. 2 crackers and 2 vs. 3 crackers typically selected the container containing more crackers (Figure 1). However, infants typically showed no strong preference for the container holding more crackers when presented with 3 vs. 4 crackers.
Infants consistently chose the container containing the greater number of crackers when presented with comparisons of 1 vs. 2 and 2 vs. 3. However, infants failed to represent differences between larger numbers of items. Critically, this result does not rely solely on proportions, because infants also fail to discriminate between 3 vs. 6, which is the same proportion as 1 vs. 2.
Figure 1: Proportion of infants selecting the container with the greater number of crackers.
Applications and Summary
Although infants are limited in the number of objects they can represent at any given time, the fact that they can represent 2 vs. 3, or up to five items, at one time is cited as evidence that even very young infants can represent number and make comparisons between different values. The method described here can also be applied to measuring how other species, such as dogs and chimps, reason about number.
Infants are impressively capable of representing number and making comparisons of more versus less at a very young age. The results reported here show that infants can reason about their environment in sophisticated ways, and this early skill may contribute to the emergence of numerical reasoning and mathematical ability later in development. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether these representational skills indicate true mathematical understanding, or if they are more appropriately considered in terms of visual representations.
References
- Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science., 13, 150-156 (2002).
Transcript
Very early in life—before the age of 1—humans develop a foundation in the mathematical understanding of numerical quantities, called numerical cognition.
To build this foundation, infants begin to form rough mental representations that allow them to make judgments about number and develop the concept of less versus more.
However, probing these concepts of numerical cognition can be difficult. Thus, researchers must be creative in designing tasks by using alluring objects, such as toys or food, due to the limited set of responses—like crawling—in infants.
Using the method developed by Drs. Feigenson, Carey, and colleagues, this video demonstrates how to setup and test numerical cognition in infants, as well as how to analyze and interpret the data regarding judgments between quantities of food items.
In this experiment, 12-month-old infants watch the researcher place appealing graham crackers, one at a time, into two different opaque containers. The number of crackers placed into each one varies, depending on the assigned condition: 1 vs. 2, 2 vs. 3, and 3 vs. 4.
The infants are allowed to crawl to one of the two, and the choice of container is the dependent variable.
If infants are able to represent number, they are expected to choose the one with the most crackers by crawling to that container. However, due to their age, there may be a limit in their capacity to discriminate more than five, in which case they would choose a container at random.
Before the arrival of the infant, ensure the proper functioning of the video equipment and collect one empty small bucket and another filled with graham crackers, a toy, and two tall opaque containers.
To begin the experiment, greet the infant and have them sit on the floor while you sit 100 cm away facing them. Once settled, have an assistant start the video camera to record the session.
First acclimate the infant to crawling towards a container: when the infant is looking, place the toy inside the empty bucket and non-verbally encourage them to crawl and retrieve the toy. After they crawl to the toy, remove it and the bucket and place the infant back to the starting position.
To initiate the test phase, simultaneously introduce the two large containers and show the infant that they are empty. Place the containers 70 cm in front of the infant and 35 cm apart, ensuring that they cannot reach both containers at the same time.
Retrieve the small bucket of graham crackers. Hold up one cracker and say “Look at this.” When the infant is looking, place the cracker into a container. Continue this process until both containers have the appropriate number of crackers for the given condition.
After placing all crackers, look down to avoid influencing the infant’s response of choosing a container. Without looking up, verbally encourage them to pick a container after 10 seconds: “Come this way.”
Once the test phase is completed, have two independent coders who are blind to the conditions view the video recordings and make note of the chosen container for each infant.
To analyze the results, count the number of infants that chose the container with the greater number of crackers and graph the resulting percentages for each condition.
Notice that infants were very good at picking the container with the greater quantity for conditions 1 vs. 2 and 2 vs. 3, but performed near chance level in condition 3 vs. 4, suggesting that there is an upper limit to numerical representation at this age of 12 months.
Now that you are familiar with the methods used to test the concept of less vs. more in infants, let’s look at the emergence of numerical reasoning in other species and the importance of numerical cognition in mathematical ability.
A very similar experimental setup can be used to explore numerical cognition in other animals, such as dogs.
Comparisons in numerical abilities between other species—like birds choosing more food and guppies joining larger social groups—add to the understanding of the ontogeny for numerical competence in the absence of language.
Representing number and making comparisons of more versus less show that infants can reason about their environment in sophisticated ways. This early skill may contribute to the emergence later in development of numerical reasoning and mathematical ability such as addition, subtraction, and even calculus.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to numerical cognition. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and run an experiment investigating how infants represent number and quantity, as well as how to analyze and assess the results.
Thanks for watching!