-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Biology
Assays for the Degradation of Misfolded Proteins in Cells
Assays for the Degradation of Misfolded Proteins in Cells
JoVE Journal
Biology
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Journal Biology
Assays for the Degradation of Misfolded Proteins in Cells

Assays for the Degradation of Misfolded Proteins in Cells

Full Text
12,271 Views
10:56 min
August 28, 2016

DOI: 10.3791/54266-v

Lili Guo1,2, Wil Prall1, Xiaolu Yang1

1Department of Cancer Biology,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 2Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

Summary

This report describes protocols for measuring degradation rates of misfolded proteins by either western blot or fluorescence-based assays. The methods can be applied to analysis of other misfolded proteins and for high throughput screening.

Transcript

The overall goal of this assay is to measure the cellular degradation rates of misfolded proteins. Misfolded proteins are associated with many neurodegenerative diseases. This assay helps to investigate the cellular protein quality control systems that are protectors against aberrant proteins.

Misfolding prone proteins may exist in different forms in cells. By combining cell fractionation with the cyclohexane method chase, the main advantage of this technique is to specifically measure the half life of the misfolded species. We use two model proteins as examples.

A highly aggregation prone polyglutamate protein, Atxn1 82Q and a conformationally unstable nuclear luciferase mutant. The protocol can also be applied to other misfolded protein measurements. To carry out a degradation assay for Atxn1 82Q GFP, plate approximately 3x10^5 HeLa cells in 35 millimeter plates with DMEM medium and 10%FBS.

Incubate the cells overnight so that they reach 40 to 60%confluence at the time of transfection. Four to five hours after transfecting the cells with Atxn1 82Q GFP PRK5, under a florescence microscope, use an excitation wavelength of 450 to 490 nanometers to examine the live cells for GFP expression in the nuclei, characterized by the presence of diffused as well as small speckles of GFP signals. Just before cycloheximide treatment, harvest one plate of cells by removing the medium and using three milliliters of ice cold PBS to wash the cells twice.

Then snap freeze the plate on dry ice. For the remaining plates of cells, remove the medium by vacuum aspiration and add two milliliters of fresh DMEM containing 50 micrograms per milliliter of cycloheximide. Also add 10 micromolar of the proteasome inhibitor, MG132 to one plate.

Incubate treated cells for four, eight, 12 and 16 hours before freezing on dry ice. After harvesting the MG132 treated cells at 16 hours, scrape the frozen cells from all the plates into 150 microliter of ice cold cell lysis buffer and incubate on ice for 30 minutes. Centrifuge the lysates in a benchtop centrifuge at 17, 000x g and four degrees Celsius for 15 minutes.

Then transfer the supernatant which contains MP40 soluble proteins to another tube. Rinse the pellets by gently adding approximately 200 microliters of 1x PBS to the tubes without disturbing the pellets. Carefully remove the PBS by aspiration or pipette, resuspend the pellets in 150 microliters of ice cold pellet buffer and then incubate them on ice for 15 to 30 minutes.

Next add 75 microliters of 3x boiling buffer into MP40 soluble fractions and MP40 insoluble fractions resuspended from the pellets. Then heat the samples at 95 degrees Celsius on a heat block for five minutes. Add SDS gel loading buffer to an aliquot of boiled MP40 soluble and insoluble fractions.

Load equal volumes of samples collected from all time points onto an SDS-PAGE gel. Detect MP40 soluble and SDS soluble Atxn1 82Q GFP by Western blot using anti GFP antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence. To examine SDS resistant Atxn1 82Q from the pellet fraction with a filter retardation assay, set up a dot plot apparatus holding a 0.2 micron cellulose acetate membrane.

Then load 80 to 120 microliters of boiled MP40 insoluble samples into each well of the dot blot apparatus. After filtering the samples through the membrane by vacuum, detect Atxn1 82Q GFP aggregates stuck on the membrane by anti GFP immunoblotting. It is critical to use a filter retardation assay to examine the levels of SDS resistant form over time.

This is because SDS soluble form may transform into SDS resistant form rather than being degraded. In this example, SDS resistant form is minimal and remains a similar level over the chase experiment. To carry out a degradation assay, after an overnight transfection of HeLa cells with NLS-luciferase-GFP, examine the live cells under an inverted fluorescent microscope for GFP expression with an excitation wavelength of 450 to 490 nanometers.

Just before cycloheximide treatment, harvest one plate of cells by removing the medium and use three milliliters of ice cold PBS to wash the cells twice. Then snap freeze the plate on dry ice. For the remaining plates, after removing the medium, add two milliliters of fresh DMEM containing 50 micrograms per milliliter of cycloheximide and add 10 micromolar of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 to one plate.

Treat the cells for 1.5, three, 4.5 and six hours before harvesting as just described, harvesting the MG132 treated cells at six hours. After harvesting the last time point of cells, scrape each plate into 150 microliters of ice cold cell lysis buffer and incubate on ice for 30 minutes. Incubate the samples on heat block at 95 degrees Celsius for five minutes, before carrying out SDS-PAGE and Western blotting according to the text protocol.

Add SDS gel loading buffer to whole cell lysates for a final concentration of 2%SDS and 50 millimolar DTT. After seeding and transfecting HeLa cells in 96 well plates according to the text protocol, 20 to 24 hours after transfection, examine the cells for GFP expression. Remove the medium, add approximately 200 microliters of 1x PBS to each well and then aspirate it to remove the residual DMEM.

Add 60 microliters of low fluorescence DMEM with 5%FBS and 50 micrograms per milliliter of cycloheximide and add 10 micromolar MG132 to one set of samples. With a fluorescence plate reader, measure the GFP signal, reading the plates every hour for up to eight to 10 hours. Export the data and carry out statistical analysis according to the text protocol.

In a steady state analysis, microscopically visible Atxn1 82Q GFP nuclear aggregates can be observed in 30 to 50%of HeLa cells 20 hours after transfection. As seen here by Western blot, the half life of Atxn1 82Q GFP in the SDS soluble fraction is around five hours. In contrast to a slight or no decrease in Atxn1 82Q GFP in the MP40 soluble fraction over 16 hours.

The degradation of Atxn1 82Q GFP is partially inhibited by treating cells with MG132. These images illustrate that 20 hours after transfection, NLS-luciferase DM mutant GFP aggregates become microscopically visible in five to 15%of HeLa cells. Western blots revealed that the half life of SDS soluble NLS-luciferase DM mutant GFP is two to three hours.

In addition, the florescence intensity of transfected cells also decreases over time upon cycloheximide treatment. At approximately six hours after cycloheximide treatment, soluble NLS-luciferase DM mutant GFP is largely degraded suggesting that the remaining fluorescence is generated from aggregated species resistant to degradation. These florescence images confirm that aggregated, but not diffused GFP, remains in cells nine hours after cycloheximide treatment.

Well the immunblotting based assay takes a few days to accomplish. The protein degradation rates can be obtained immediately after the cycloheximide chase using a fluorescence based assay. Both immunoblotting and fluorescence based assays can be applied to studies of other misfolded protein.

The latter is also suitable for high throughput screening for identifying macromolecules or small compounds that can modulate the degradation of misfolded proteins. It is important to remember that for some misfolded proteins such Atxn1 82Q, the half life can only be measured through cell fractionation and immunoblotting and this is because the misfolded species that degraded quickly are only a small portion of the overall Atxn1 82Q expression. To uncover the mechanism of a protein quality controls, protein degradation assays need to be coupled with analysis of the steady state levels of aggregates as well as that they are partitions in different cell fractions.

Other experiments like in vitro protein folding and aggregation assays can also be performed. After watching this video, you should have a good understanding of how to measure the degradation rates of misfolding proteins using different strategies. Thanks for watching and good luck with your experiments.

Explore More Videos

Misfolded ProteinsProtein DegradationProtein Quality ControlNeurodegenerative DiseasesAtxn1 82QNuclear LuciferaseCell FractionationCycloheximideProteasome InhibitorMG132Cell LysisCentrifugation

Related Videos

Protein Aggregate Formation Assay: A Method to Detect and Quantify Protein Aggregation in Cultured Cells upon Induction by Proteasome Inhibitor

04:12

Protein Aggregate Formation Assay: A Method to Detect and Quantify Protein Aggregation in Cultured Cells upon Induction by Proteasome Inhibitor

Related Videos

625 Views

Misfolding-Prone Protein Degradation Assay: A Technique to Monitor Misfolded Protein Degradation Using Cycloheximide Treatment and Detergent Fractionation

05:42

Misfolding-Prone Protein Degradation Assay: A Technique to Monitor Misfolded Protein Degradation Using Cycloheximide Treatment and Detergent Fractionation

Related Videos

605 Views

Fluorescence Microplate-Based Cycloheximide Chase Assay: A Technique to Monitor the Degradation Kinetics of Fluorescent Nuclear Misfolded Proteins

02:59

Fluorescence Microplate-Based Cycloheximide Chase Assay: A Technique to Monitor the Degradation Kinetics of Fluorescent Nuclear Misfolded Proteins

Related Videos

926 Views

4D Imaging of Protein Aggregation in Live Cells

08:59

4D Imaging of Protein Aggregation in Live Cells

Related Videos

17.6K Views

Coupled Assays for Monitoring Protein Refolding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

13:52

Coupled Assays for Monitoring Protein Refolding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Related Videos

10.5K Views

Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Protein Homeostasis in a Multicellular Organism

12:38

Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System to Study Protein Homeostasis in a Multicellular Organism

Related Videos

6.3K Views

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants

07:43

Assaying Proteasomal Degradation in a Cell-free System in Plants

Related Videos

14.8K Views

Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation

07:47

Reporter-based Growth Assay for Systematic Analysis of Protein Degradation

Related Videos

10.9K Views

Growth-based Determination and Biochemical Confirmation of Genetic Requirements for Protein Degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

10:57

Growth-based Determination and Biochemical Confirmation of Genetic Requirements for Protein Degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Related Videos

10K Views

Assay Development for High Content Quantification of Sod1 Mutant Protein Aggregate Formation in Living Cells

11:12

Assay Development for High Content Quantification of Sod1 Mutant Protein Aggregate Formation in Living Cells

Related Videos

7.5K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code