-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
<<<<<<< HEAD
K12 Schools
Biopharma
=======
K12 Schools
>>>>>>> dee1fd4 (fixed header link)

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Immunology and Infection
Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Cand...
Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Cand...
JoVE Journal
Immunology and Infection
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Journal Immunology and Infection
Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16

Use of Viral Entry Assays and Molecular Docking Analysis for the Identification of Antiviral Candidates against Coxsackievirus A16

Full Text
8,332 Views
06:03 min
July 15, 2019

DOI: 10.3791/59920-v

Jonathan Y. Wang1, Chien-Ju Lin2, Ching-Hsuan Liu3,4, Liang-Tzung Lin3,5

1Department of Molecular Biosciences,University of Texas at Austin, 2School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy,Kaohsiung Medical University, 3Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine,Taipei Medical University, 4Department of Microbiology and Immunology,Dalhousie University, 5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine,Taipei Medical University

The goal of the protocol is to illustrate the different assays relating to viral entry that can be used to identify candidate viral entry inhibitors.

This protocol can aid in the discovery of potential antiviral small molecules through a mechanism-driven approach. The time of addition assay determines at which step of the infection the small molecule exhibits its antiviral activity. Molecular docking predicts the interaction between the small molecule and the viral proteins.

To evaluate the influence of drugs on host cells prior to viral infection, seed RD cells in 12-well plates at a two times 10 to the fifth cells per well plating density. Incubate the cells at 37 degrees Celsius in a 5%carbon dioxide incubator overnight. The next morning, treat each well of the RD monolayer with a test compound of interest, in triplicate, at non-toxic concentrations in one milliliter of basal medium for one or four hours.

At the end of the treatment incubation, wash the cells with one milliliter of PBS before adding 50 plaque-forming units of virus in 300 microliters of basal medium per well for one hour, with rocking every 15 minutes. At the end of the infection incubation, wash the cells with PBS and overlay the cells with one milliliter of fresh basal medium containing 0.8%methylcellulose. After 72 hours in the cell culture incubator, wash each well with two milliliters of PBS and fix the cells with 0.5 milliliters of 37%formaldehyde per well for 15 minutes.

At the end of the fixation, wash the wells with PBS and stain the cells with 0.5 milliliters of 0.5%crystal violet solution per well. After two minutes, wash the wells with a gentle stream of water and allow the plate to air dry. Then place the plate on a white light box for counting and calculate the percent of coxsackievirus infected cells according to the formula.

For molecular docking analysis, download 3D molecules of the test compounds from PubChem. If a molecule does not have a 3D structure uploaded, download the 2D structure or use the SMILE string sequence to transform the structure into a 3D molecule via an appropriate molecular program. Next, download a viral biological assembly unit from RCSB Protein Data Bank.

Using an appropriate bio-computing program, delete the solvents from the Protein Data Bank file, replace the incomplete side chains using data from the Dunbrack 2010 rotamer library and add hydrogens and charges to the structure as previously reported. To dock the test compounds onto the prepared virus unit, upload the test compound file into University of California San Francisco Chimera as the ligand and select the whole prepared viral protein as the receptor to perform blind docking. For additional docking, confine the docking site onto the viral protein to regions of interest derived from the blind docking results by further reducing the search volume.

Then upload the docking file into an appropriate molecular graphics system to analyze the binding mode positions. Select the ligand to find polar contacts from the compound to the viral protein, identifying the polar contacts with the to any atoms option. Both of the small molecules tested in this representative experiment, only produced a marginal impact against the coxsackievirus A16 infectivity, whether in the pretreatment of the host cells prior to viral infection or in the post-infection treatment.

In contrast, the molecules efficiently abrogated the infection by greater than 80%in the co-addition treatment, suggesting that the two compounds are the most effective when they are concurrently present with the virus particles on the host cell surface during the infection. Flow cytometry based binding analysis confirms that the two tannins prevented coxsackievirus A16 infectivity entry by preventing viral particle binding to the host cells. Molecular docking of the tannins indicates that they are both predicted to bind in the canyon region of the coxsackievirus pentamer, just above the pocket entrance that holds the pocket factor and plays an important role for mediating coxsackievirus binding and entry into the host cell.

In these surface projections, the unique residues predicted from the polar contacts of the small molecules around the pocket entrance can be observed, with asparagine-85, lysine-257, and asparagine-417 in common between the two tannins. For molecular docking, the topology of the viral protein needs to be taken into account when ranking the binding frames. Additional experiments could include testing the antiviral activity of the compound on recombinant viruses, with mutations on the amino acids discovered to validate their importance to the drug's efficacy.

View the full transcript and gain access to thousands of scientific videos

Sign In Start Free Trial

Explore More Videos

Viral Entry AssaysMolecular DockingAntiviral CandidatesCoxsackievirus A16Small MoleculesTime Of Addition AssayHost CellsRD CellsTest CompoundPlaque-forming UnitsCell CultureFixationCrystal Violet StainingPubChem3D MoleculesRCSB Protein Data BankBio-computing Program

Related Videos

Assessing the Effectiveness of an Antiviral Test Compound through a Viral Inactivation Assay

03:41

Assessing the Effectiveness of an Antiviral Test Compound through a Viral Inactivation Assay

Related Videos

521 Views

A Viral Attachment Assay for Screening of Antiviral Compounds

02:47

A Viral Attachment Assay for Screening of Antiviral Compounds

Related Videos

989 Views

An Assay to Evaluate the Effect of Test Compounds on Viral Entry and Fusion in Host Cells

02:38

An Assay to Evaluate the Effect of Test Compounds on Viral Entry and Fusion in Host Cells

Related Videos

537 Views

Assays for the Identification of Novel Antivirals against Bluetongue Virus

12:02

Assays for the Identification of Novel Antivirals against Bluetongue Virus

Related Videos

14.5K Views

High-throughput Screening for Broad-spectrum Chemical Inhibitors of RNA Viruses

11:34

High-throughput Screening for Broad-spectrum Chemical Inhibitors of RNA Viruses

Related Videos

14.3K Views

Early Viral Entry Assays for the Identification and Evaluation of Antiviral Compounds

09:29

Early Viral Entry Assays for the Identification and Evaluation of Antiviral Compounds

Related Videos

30.8K Views

Highly Sensitive Assay for Measurement of Arenavirus-cell Attachment

08:34

Highly Sensitive Assay for Measurement of Arenavirus-cell Attachment

Related Videos

10K Views

Arbovirus Infections As Screening Tools for the Identification of Viral Immunomodulators and Host Antiviral Factors

06:02

Arbovirus Infections As Screening Tools for the Identification of Viral Immunomodulators and Host Antiviral Factors

Related Videos

7.4K Views

Analysis of Group IV Viral SSHHPS Using In Vitro and In Silico Methods

10:40

Analysis of Group IV Viral SSHHPS Using In Vitro and In Silico Methods

Related Videos

26.4K Views

Engineering Antiviral Agents via Surface Plasmon Resonance

13:00

Engineering Antiviral Agents via Surface Plasmon Resonance

Related Videos

2.7K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • JoVE Newsroom
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code