Generazione e analisi quantitativa della pulsato a bassa frequenza ad ultrasuoni per determinare la sensibilità di Sonic di non trattata e trattata cellule neoplastiche


Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations | Reprints and Permissions

Trendowski, M., Christen, T. D., Zoino, J. N., Acquafondata, C., Fondy, T. P. Generation and Quantitative Analysis of Pulsed Low Frequency Ultrasound to Determine the Sonic Sensitivity of Untreated and Treated Neoplastic Cells. J. Vis. Exp. (101), e53060, doi:10.3791/53060 (2015).

Please note that all translations are automatically generated.

Click here for the english version. For other languages click here.



Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium w/ NaHCO3 & 25mM Hepes  Life Technologies 12440079
Amphotericin B Solution  Sigma-Aldrich A2942 
Penicillin/Streptomycin 100x Solution  Life Technologies 10378-016
Fetal Bovine Serum Sigma-Aldrich 12105
Branson SLPe 40kHz Cell Disruptor with 3" (25mm) Cuphorn Branson Ultrasonics 101-063-726 sonication device
Brisk Heat SDC Benchtop Digital temperature Controler w/ 1000 ml Beaker Heater Brisk Heat SDCJF1A-GBH1000-1 heater used for temperature control
Beckman-Coulter Z2 Cell Sizer with AccuComp® Software Beckman-Coulter 6605700
Bio-Rad TC20 Automated Cell Counter Bio-Rad 145-0102
Gentamicin 50 mg/ml Sigma-Aldrich G1397 
Trypan Blue Solution Sigma-Aldrich T8154
Falcon 50 ml & 25 ml Vented Culture Flasks Fisher Scientific 353082
Lonza L-Glutamine 200 mM 0.85% NaCl Lonza 17-605C 
Seal-Rite 1.5 ml Microcentrifuge Tubes USA Scientific 1615-5510
Beckman-Coulter Accuvette ST 25 ml Vials and caps Beckman-Coulter  A35473
AccuJet Pro Auto Pipet  BrandTech Scientific 26330
USA Scientific 10 ml Disposable Serological Pipets USA Scientific 1071-0810
Tip One 100 μl and 1,000 μl Filter Tips USA Scientific 1120-1840, 1126-7810
100 μl Micropipette  Wheaton 851164
1,000 μl Micropipette Wheaton 851168
BioRad Dual Chamber Counting Slides Bio-Rad 145-0015
Forma Scientific Dual chamber water jacketed Incubator Forma Scientific 3131
Tektronix  DPO 2002B Digital Phosphor Oscilloscope Tektronix DPO2002B used to measure the ultrasonic waveform
PPB MegaSonics Model PB-500 Ultrasonic Energy Meter PPB Megasonics PB-500  used to assess the sound intensity in W/cm2
Teledyne RESON TC4013-1 Hydrophone Teledyne TC4013-1  connects to the oscilloscope 
Wheaton 250 ml Flasks Sigma-Aldrich Z364827
20 ml Glass Scintillation Vials  Sigma-Aldrich Z190527
Beckman-Coulter Isotonic Saline Solution  Beckman-Coulter N/A diluent for Z2 counter
Chloroform 99% Sigma-Aldrich C2432
Ethanol 200 Proof Anhydrous  Sigma-Aldrich 459836
Mineral Oil N/A
XTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit ATCC 30-1011K
96-Well Microplate Reader Cole-Palmer  EW-13055-54
U937 Human Monocytic Leukemia Cells ATCC CRL­1593.2
THP1 Human Monocytic Leukemia Cells ATCC TIB-202



  1. Trendowski, M. The promise of sonodynamic therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 33, (1), 143-160 (2014).
  2. Semins, M. J., Trock, B. J., Matlaga, B. R. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: A meta-analysis. J Urol. 179, (1), 194-197 (2008).
  3. Pace, K. T., Ghiculete, D., Harju, M., Honey, R. J. Shock Wave Lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: A randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol. 174, (2), 595-599 (2005).
  4. McClain, P. D., Lange, J. N., Assimos, D. G. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review. Rev Urol. 15, (2), 49-60 (2013).
  5. Mitragotri, S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 4, (3), 255-260 (2005).
  6. Cordeiro, E. R., Cathelineau, X., Thüroff, S., Marberger, M., Crouzet, S., de la Rosette, J. J. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for definitive treatment of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 110, (9), 1228-1242 (2012).
  7. Li, P. Z., et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 11, (6), 655-660 (2012).
  8. Xiaoping, L., Leizhen, Z. Advances of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for pancreatic cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 29, (7), 678-682 (2013).
  9. Lukka, H., et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 23, (2), 117-127 (2011).
  10. So, A. I. HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer). Can Urol Assoc J. 5, (6), 424-426 (2011).
  11. Crouzet, S., et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol. 65, (5), 907-914 (2014).
  12. Tezel, A., Mitragotri, S. Interactions of inertial cavitation bubbles with stratum corneum lipid bilayers during low-frequency sonophoresis. Biophys J. 85, 3502-3512 (2003).
  13. Tang, H., Wang, C. C., Blankschtein, D., Langer, R. An investigation of the role of cavitation in low-frequency ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug transport. Pharm Res. 19, (8), 1160-1169 (2002).
  14. Ueda, H., Mutoh, M., Seki, T., Kobayashi, D., Morimoto, Y. Acoustic cavitation as an enhancing mechanism of low-frequency sonophoresis for transdermal drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull. 32, (5), 916-920 (2009).
  15. Trendowski, M., Yu, G., Wong, Y., Aquafondata, C., Christen, T., Fondy, T. P. The real deal: Using cytochalasin B in sonodynamic therapy to preferentially damage leukemia cells. Anticancer Res. 34, (5), 2195-2202 (2014).
  16. Sonifier Cell Disrupter Model SLPeEDP. Branson Ultrasonics Corporation. Available from: (2010).
  17. Lagneaux, L., et al. Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: A novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells. Exp Hematol. 30, (11), 1293-1301 (2002).
  18. Krasovitskia, B., Frenkelb, V., Shohama, S., Kimmel, K. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108, (8), 3258-3263 (2011).
  19. Sundaram, J., Mellein, B. R., Mitragotri, S. An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophys J. 84, (5), 3087-3101 (2003).
  20. Mizrahi, N., et al. Low intensity ultrasound perturbs cytoskeleton dynamics. Soft Matter. 8, (8), 2438-2443 (2012).
  21. Chen, X., Leow, R. S., Hu, Y., Wan, J. M., Yu, A. C. Single-site sonoporation disrupts actin cytoskeleton organization. J R Soc Interface. 11, (95), 20140071 (2014).
  22. Trendowski, M., et al. Preferential enlargement of leukemia cells using cytoskeletal-directed agents and cell cycle growth control parameters to induce sensitivity to low frequency ultrasound. Cancer Lett. In press, (2015).
  23. Dumontet, C., Sikic, B. I. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: Microtubule dynamics, drug transport, and cell death. J Clin Oncol. 17, (3), 1061-1070 (1999).
  24. Verrills, N. M., Kavallaris, M. Improving the targeting of tubulin-binding agents: lessons from drug resistance studies. Curr Pharm Des. 11, (13), 1719-1733 (2005).
  25. Trendowski, M. The inherent metastasis of leukaemia and its exploitation by sonodynamic therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. In press, (2014).
  26. Trendowski, M., Wong, V., Wellington, K., Hatfield, S., Fondy, T. P. Tolerated doses in zebrafish of cytochalasins and jasplakinolide for comparison with tolerated doses in mice in the evaluation of pre-clinical activity of microfilament-directed agents in tumor model systems in vivo. In Vivo. 28, (6), 1021-1031 (2014).



    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Usage Statistics