In order to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neotissue formation and stenosis development in tissue engineered heart valves, a murine model of heterotopic heart valve transplantation was developed. A pulmonary heart valve was transplanted to recipient using the heterotopic heart transplantation technique.
Tissue engineered heart valves, especially decellularized valves, are starting to gain momentum in clinical use of reconstructive surgery with mixed results. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the neotissue development, valve thickening, and stenosis development are not researched extensively. To answer the above questions, we developed a murine heterotopic heart valve transplantation model. A heart valve was harvested from a valve donor mouse and transplanted to a heart donor mouse. The heart with a new valve was transplanted heterotopically to a recipient mouse. The transplanted heart showed its own heartbeat, independent of the recipient’s heartbeat. The blood flow was quantified using a high frequency ultrasound system with a pulsed wave Doppler. The flow through the implanted pulmonary valve showed forward flow with minimal regurgitation and the peak flow was close to 100 mm/sec. This murine model of heart valve transplantation is highly versatile, so it can be modified and adapted to provide different hemodynamic environments and/or can be used with various transgenic mice to study neotissue development in a tissue engineered heart valve.
Congenital cardiovascular defects are one of the leading causes of infant mortality in the western world1,2. Among them, pulmonic valve stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve defects are a frequently occurring form3. Heart valve replacement surgery is a routine choice of reconstructive surgeries; however, complications including stenosis and calcification of the heart valve, and lifelong dependence on anticoagulants are a significant source of chronic ill health and death4-7. Moreover, the lack of growth potential requires revision surgeries, which further increases the mortality of those young patients4,8,9.
In an attempt to develop a functional replacement heart valve with growth potential, Shinoka et al. seeded autologous cells onto a biodegradable synthetic heart valve8. The synthetic valve transformed to a native heart valve like structure with growth potential. Preliminary large animal studies demonstrated the feasibility of using this methodology to create a functional heart valve10. However, long term implantation studies demonstrated poor durability due to progressive thickening of the valve neotissue resulting in narrowing of the heart valve. Work from Sodian et al. used the Shinoka methodology, but ultimately replaced the PGA matrix with a biodegradable elastomer, which gave the biomechanical properties of the tissue engineered valve construct a more physiological profile9,11,12. In the in vivo study, despite the success of the implantation, a confluent endothelial cell lining was not formed which could limit the long term success of this scaffold12.
In order to rationally design an improved second generation synthetic heart valve, a murine model of heart valve transplantation was created to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neotissue formation, valve thickening, and stenosis development. Murine models offer a vast array of molecular reagents, including transgenics, which are not readily available in other species7. In this heart valve transplantation model, an ex vivo syngeneic pulmonary heart valve replacement was performed first; and then the heart with the implanted heart valve was implanted heterotopically into a syngeneic host using a microsurgical technique. This model enables heart valve replacement without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass.
In this paper, a detailed explanation of a heart valve harvest, donor heart preparations, heart valve transplantation, and heterotopic heart transplantation is described. The results showed a continuous heartbeat from the donor heart, which was independent of the recipient heartbeat. The blood flow through the implanted pulmonary valve was measured using a high frequency ultrasound system with a pulsed wave Doppler.
Note: All animal procedures were approved by the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
1. Pulmonary Heart Valve Harvest from a Heart Valve Donor Mouse
2. Donor Heart Preparation
3. Heart Valve Transplantation onto a Donor Heart
4. Heterotopic Heart Transplantation on to a Recipient Mouse
Figure 1 illustrates the schematics of the heart valve transplantation model using heterotopic heart transplantation. The heart valve was harvested from a donor heart and implanted onto a heart from a second donor mouse. Then the heart with the new heart valve was implanted to the abdomen of a recipient mouse. Figure 2 shows an illustration of the implanted heart on the abdominal space (A), right after heart transplantation (B), and 5 min after transplantation. Upon removing sutures on both sides of the aorta and IVC, the heart starts to beat 1-2 min later and becomes pinker with more blood circulation. Note that the right atrium is more dilated in (C) than (B). The heart gradually beats stronger and is stable after 24 hr.
The blood flow through the implanted pulmonary valve was measured percutaneously 10 days after implantation using a high frequency ultrasound system with the pulsed-wave Doppler mode (Figure 3). The locations of the aorta, right ventricle (RV), implanted pulmonary valve (PV), and pulmonary artery (PA) in B mode was shown in Figure 3 (A). The yellow sample volume overlay is located on the implanted PV. Figure 3 (B) shows a diagram of the anatomy and the location of the sample volume overlay. As shown in Figure 3 (C), the donor heart QRS wave was detected rhythmically and independent of the recipient heart wave. The measured systolic and diastolic blood volume at the implanted PV matched the donor heart wave. The peak velocity was around 100 mm/sec.
Figure 1. Schematic of heart valve transplantation. A pulmonary heart valve was harvested from a first donor mouse and implanted into a heart from a second donor mouse. Then the heart with the new valve was implanted heterotopically into a recipient mouse.
Figure 2. The transplanted heart. A) A diagram of a heart with new heart valve implanted to abdominal space (B) right after the implantation, and (C) 5 min after implantation.
Figure 3. Blood flow measurement in implanted pulmonary valve. A) B-mode image indicating the locations of aorta, right ventricle (RV), implanted pulmonary valve (PV) and pulmonary artery (PA). B) A diagram of the anatomy and location of the sample volume overlay. C) Velocity measurement at the implanted PV with ECG wave.
The mortality rate of this procedure is close to 20%, which was mostly caused by hemorrhage at the PV transplantation site and anastomosis on the donor aorta to the recipient abdominal aorta. In most of the cases, the mortality rate decreases significantly 48 hr post surgery. The survival mice showed strong heart beats and blood flow through the implanted PV. The entire process takes four hours for an experienced micro surgeon. It will take roughly 250 mice to master the technique. The heterotopic heart transplantation is relatively straight forward in comparison to the PV implantation to the donor heart. One of the most critical steps for a successful HV transplantation is harvest of the PV structure from a donor mouse. The PV structure should be transected around 1-2 mm below the valve. If the remaining tissue is too short, anastomosis will be challenging. If the tissue below the PV is too long (i.e. the PA will be too long in comparison to the ascending aorta after implantation), the implanted PA may twist or kink. Another critical step is the anastomosis between the implanted PA and recipient IVC. Since the IVC is very thin, it is extremely easy to tear during suturing.
In this model, the aortic blood comes through the aorta, flows through the coronary arteries, then exits through coronary sinus to the donor RA. So the blood volume to pass through the implanted PV is 5% of the total blood volume in estimation, which is the most significant limitation of this model in studying TEHV. To increase the blood flow though the PV, three additional models were created. First, a third anastomosis was created from the donor RV to the recipient IVC. The third anastomosis can increase blood flow by 10% to 50% of total blood volume. Second, to further increase the blood flow, after placing the third anastomosis, the IVC was ligated proximal to the third anastomosis. This method insured 50% of blood flow through the implanted PV. Third, in order to increase flow through the implanted PV and maintain more physiological circulation, the heart was transplanted with the lungs. This method could increase the flow up to 50% of total blood flow and more importantly, the left ventricle and left atrium maintain their circulation. These different physiological flow models enable us to study how the difference in physiological flow conditions affect the development of neotissue and stenosis in a transplanted heart valve.
Recently, we conducted a pilot study to transplant decellularized HV without cell seeding using the described technique in this paper. The implanted PV showed similar blood flow characteristics as the control, predecellularized transplanted PV. In the future, different types of cells will be seeded to study the neotissue formation and stenosis development of the transplanted HV. Moreover, using transgenic mice, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) mice or a mouse model of HV disease, the process of neotissue formation can be studied mechanistically by studying the source of cells populating the decellularized or diseased heart valve using immunohistochemistry, which will aid the development of more rationally designed, second generation tissue engineered heart valves. The possibility of using different physiological flow conditions, transgenic mice, decellularized PV implantations, and possible combinations of all three show the versatility and potentially important preclinical utility of this HV transplantation model.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the NIH (RO1 HL098228) to CKB.
DPBS | gibco | 14190-144 | |
Microscope | Leica | M80 | |
C57BL/6J (H-2b), Female | Jackson Laboratories | 664 | 8-12 weeks |
Ketamine Hydrochloride Injection | Hospira Inc. | NDC 0409-2053 | |
Xylazine Sterile Solution | Akorn Inc. | NADA# 139-236 | |
ketoprofen | Fort Dodge Animal Health | NDC 0856-4396-01 | |
Ibuprofen | PrecisionDose | NDC 68094-494-59 | |
Heparin Sodium | Sagent Pharmaceticals | NDC 25021-400 | |
Saline solution (Sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride) | Hospira Inc. | NDC 0409-0138-22 | |
0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection | Hospira Inc. | NDC 0409-4888-10 | |
Petrolatum Ophthalmic Ointment | Dechra Veterinary Products | NDC 17033-211-38 | |
Iodine Prep Pads | Triad Disposables, Inc. | NDC 50730-3201-1 | |
Alcohol Prep Pads | McKesson Corp. | NDC 68599-5805-1 | |
Cotton tipped applicators | Fisher Sientific | 23-400-118 | |
Fine Scissor | FST | 14028-10 | |
Micro-Adson Forcep | FST | 11018-12 | |
Clamp Applying Forcep | FST | 00072-14 | |
S&T Vascular Clamp | FST | 00396-01 | |
Spring Scissors | FST | 15008-08 | |
Colibri Retractors | FST | 17000-04 | |
Dumont #5 Forcep | FST | 11251-20 | |
Dumont #7 – Fine Forceps | FST | 11274-20 | |
Dumont #5/45 Forceps | FST | 11251-35 | |
Tish Needle Holder/Forceps | Micrins | MI1540 | |
Black Polyamide Monofilament Suture, 10-0 | AROSurgical Instruments Corporation | TI638402 | For sutureing the graft |
Black Polyamide Monofilament Suture, 6-0 | AROSurgical Instruments | SN-1956 | For musculature and skin closure |
Non-Woven Songes | McKesson Corp. | 94442000 | |
Absorbable hemostat | Ethicon | 1961 | |
1 ml Syringe | BD | 309659 | |
3 ml Syringe | BD | 309657 | |
10 ml Syringe | BD | 309604 | |
18G 1 1/2 in, Needle | BD | 305190 | |
25G 1 in., Needle | BD | 305125 | |
30G 1 in., Needle | BD | 305106 | |
Warm Water Recircultor | Gaymar | TP-700 | |
Warming Pad | Gaymar | TP-22G | |
Trimmer | Wahl | 9854-500 | |
VEVO2100 HIGH-FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND | VisualSonics | http://www.visualsonics.com/vevo2100 | The catalog number and pricing can be acquired from the sales representatives. |
Ultrasound transmission gel | PARKER LABORATORIES, INC. |
01-02 | |
Table Top Laboratory Animal Anesthesia System | VetEquip, INC. | 901806 | |
Isoflurane | Baxter | 1001936060 |