A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

A Microfluidic-based Electrochemical Biochip for Label-free DNA Hybridization Analysis

16.7K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51797

⸱

September 10th, 2014

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

We present a microfluidic-based electrochemical biochip for DNA hybridization detection. Following ssDNA probe functionalization, the specificity, sensitivity, and detection limit are studied with complementary and non-complementary ssDNA targets. Results illustrate the influence of the DNA hybridization events on the electrochemical system, with a detection limit of 3.8 nM.

Abstract

Miniaturization of analytical benchtop procedures into the micro-scale provides significant advantages in regards to reaction time, cost, and integration of pre-processing steps. Utilizing these devices towards the analysis of DNA hybridization events is important because it offers a technology for real time assessment of biomarkers at the point-of-care for various diseases. However, when the device footprint decreases the dominance of various physical phenomena increases. These phenomena influence the fabrication precision and operation reliability of the device. Therefore, there is a great need to accurately fabricate and operate these devices in a reproducible manner in order to improve the overall performance. Here, we describe the protocols and the methods used for the fabrication and the operation of a microfluidic-based electrochemical biochip for accurate analysis of DNA hybridization events. The biochip is composed of two parts: a microfluidic chip with three parallel micro-channels made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and a 3 x 3 arrayed electrochemical micro-chip. The DNA hybridization events are detected using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis. The EIS analysis enables monitoring variations of the properties of the electrochemical system that are dominant at these length scales. With the ability to monitor changes of both charge transfer and diffusional resistance with the biosensor, we demonstrate the selectivity to complementary ssDNA targets, a calculated detection limit of 3.8 nM, and a 13% cross-reactivity with other non-complementary ssDNA following 20 min of incubation. This methodology can improve the performance of miniaturized devices by elucidating on the behavior of diffusion at the micro-scale regime and by enabling the study of DNA hybridization events.

Introduction

Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices provide numerous advantages in clinical diagnostics, environmental monitoring and biomedical research. These devices utilize microfluidic channels to control fluid flow to regions of the chip where a variety of procedures can take place including reagent mixing, affinity based binding, signal transduction, and cell culturing1-4. Microfluidics provides many advantages over conventional clinical diagnostic tools such as microwell plate readers or electrophoretic gel shift assays. Microfluidic devices require 2 to 3 orders of magnitude (nanoliters as opposed to microliters) fewer reagents to perform similar assays. Also....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Microfabrication of the Microfluidic Chip

  1. Prepare Electrochemical Chip
    1. Pattern Gold Electrodes
      1. Rinse a blank 4’’ silicon wafer (prime grade quality) with acetone, methanol, and isopropanol (“AMI” clean). Rinse the isopropanol from the wafer with deionized water (DI) followed by drying with N2 gun.
      2. Grow a 1 µm thick SiO2 passivation layer with plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) tool. Deposit a 200 Å thick layer of chromium followed by a 2,000 Å thick layer of gold with a DC sputtering tool.
      3. Spin “PR1” positive photores....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A controllable and accurate manufacturing process for the experimental device is essential in research. It allows researchers to obtain reproducible and high throughput experiments. Here we have demonstrated a high yield, high reproducibility microfabrication process of a microfluidic-based electrochemical biochip (Figure 1). With a low failure rate, few devices have shown bonding issues that lead to solution leakage. In order to validate the electrochemical activity of the biochip, cyclic voltammetry me.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Our procedures demonstrate the manufacturing of a microfluidic-based electrochemical biochip and its utilization for DNA hybridization events analysis. Through a high yield controlled microfabrication process we develop a device comprised of microscale channels integrated with an array of electrochemical transducers. We have devised controlled processing parameters for the photolithography procedure of the electrochemical chip and the microfluidic channel mold through an iterative approach. These steps provide guidelines.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Robert W. Deutsch Foundation, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), and the National Science Foundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) for financial support. The authors also thank the Maryland Nanocenter and its Fablab for cleanroom facility support.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
4'' Silicon waferUltrasil4-5664Single side polished; P-type; Boron doped; Orientation 1-0-0; Thickness 500 micron; Resistance 10-20 ohm·cm
Shipley 1813 photoresist ("PR1")Microchempositive photoresist
AZ5214 photoresist ("PR2")Hoechst Celansepositive photoresist
SU-8 50 photoresist ("PR3")Microchemnegative photoresist
Gold etchantTranseneTFANo dilution
Chromium etchantTransene1020ACNo dilution
PDMS elastomerDow Corning3097366 1004
PDMS curing agentDow Corning3097358 1004
Biopsy punching toolHealthlinkBP20
Tygon flexible tubingCole Parmer R 36030.015"
Tygon flexible adapterCole Parmer 06417-410.0625"
1 ml syringeBeckton-Dickenson301025
Monobasic potassium phosphateFluka1551139
Potassium phosphate dibasic anhydrousSigmaRES20765-A7
Sodium chlorideSigma-AldrichS7653
tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphineAldrichC4706
6-mercapto-1-hexanolAldrich451088
20x concentrated saline-sodium citrate bufferSigma93017
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III)Aldrich455946
Complementary ssDNA #1Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)100 nmole DNA oligo5’-GGGACGTCCACGGAGCGCTA
TCGGAGCTTT-3’
Target ssDNA #2Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)100 nmole DNA oligo5’-/5ThioMC6-D/ACGCGTCAGGTCATTGACGA
ATCGATGAGT-3’
Complementary ssDNA #2Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)100 nmole DNA oligo5’-ACTCATCGATTCGTCAATGA
CCTGACCCGT-3’
Target ssDNA #3Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)100 nmole DNA oligo5’-/5ThioMC6-D/ACCTAGATCCAGTAGTTAGA
CCCATGATGA-3’
Complementary ssDNA #3Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT)100 nmole DNA oligo5’-TCATCATGGGTCTAACTACT
GGATCTAGGT-3’
Instrument
Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD)Oxford InstrumentsPlasmaLab System 100Chamber pressure 1,000 mTorr, Tempreture 200 °C, RF power 20 W, Gasses: a) N2O flow rate 710 sccm; b) a composition of 5% SiH4 and 95% N2 gasses flow rate 170 sccm, SiO2 growth rate 690 Å/min.
DC sputtering unitAJA InternationalATC 1800-VFor Chrome: Chamber pressure 10 mTorr, Argon flow rate 20 sccm, Supplied DC power 200 W, Sputter rate 10 nm/min. For Gold: Chamber pressure 10 mTorr, Argon flow rate 20 sccm, Supplied DC power 200 W, Sputter rate 36 nm/min.
E-beam evaporation systemDentonCustom-builtFor Titanium: Chamber pressure < 2 x 10-6 Torr, Supplied power to the e-gun 7.5 kW, Filament current 150-200 mA, Evaporation rate 6-10 Å/sec. For Platinum: Chamber pressure < 2 x 10-6 Torr, Supplied power to the e-gun 7.5 kW, Filament current 150-200 mA, Evaporation rate 2-3 Å/sec.
PotentiostatCH Instruments660D
Syringe pumpKD ScientificKDS230

References

  1. Hong, J., Edel, J. B., deMello, A. J. Micro- and nanofluidic systems for high-throughput biological screening. Drug Discov. Today. 14, 134-146 (2009).
  2. Sun, Y., Kwok, Y. C. Polymeric microfluidic system for DNA analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 556, 80-96 (2006).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Microfluidic Electrochemical BiochipElectrochemical Impedance SpectroscopyPolydimethylsiloxane MicrochannelsGold Electrode FabricationPlatinum Electrode DepositionSingle Stranded DNA ProbesCharge Transfer ResistanceBiosensor Detection LimitPoint-of-Care Diagnostics