$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Sensitivity profiles of an array of species to strategically selected toxicants have been described1 for the European REACH legislation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals). Acute or short-term toxicity tests were mostly used for this purpose as they give a quick indication of a species' sensitivity. However, in their natural environment, organisms are exposed over much longer periods and full life-cycles or even several generations could be affected2. Moreover, organisms in polluted environments are typically exposed to more than one stressor at a time, which may interact with each other, possibly resulting in synergistic effects3. Hence, safe concentrations calculated based on acute, single stressor toxicity tests may underestimate the actual risks imposed by toxicants in natural environments. It is, therefore, advisable to also study the chronic and multigenerational effects of sublethal concentrations of toxicants in an environmentally relevant context as advocated by the European Commission4,5 and the USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency)6,7. Especially in vertebrate research, the costs in terms of labor, money, and time are high when performing chronic and multigenerational exposure studies because of the relatively long lifespan of vertebrates compared to invertebrate model organisms. Therefore, it is advisable to choose the most appropriate fish model organism, depending on the research question. Furthermore, a wide array of vertebrate species should be available in order to test the generality of responses across species to be able to adapt regulations based on the most sensitive species. For now, there is a need to develop new, efficient protocols with vertebrate model species characterized by short life-cycles to lower the costs of performing chronic and multigenerational exposures on vertebrates7,8.
The turquoise killifish Nothobranchius furzeri is an interesting fish model to use in such long-term exposure experiments because of its short maturation time and life-cycle (generation time less than 4 weeks9). This means that ecologically relevant endpoints such as maturation time and fecundity can be studied within a short time frame compared to other fish models7. Furthermore, these fish produce drought-resistant, dormant eggs that remain viable for several years when stored under standard conditions, thereby eliminating the need for a continuous culture9. In ecotoxicological studies, this also implies that replicate fish can all be hatched at the exact same moment, resulting in time synchrony for all animals, even among batches of eggs produced at different times. We advise using the laboratory GRZ strain to perform exposure experiments. This strain performs well under laboratory conditions, is homozygous (except for sex chromosomes) and the genome is well characterized10,11.
In ecotoxicological studies, it is important to select the appropriate range of test concentrations. Several complementary methods can be used to this end. The nominal concentration range can be based on the sensitivity of a related species, such as Nothobranchius guentheri12. Alternatively, the range can be based on the sensitivity of standard fish models, such as zebrafish (Danio rerio)2 that have a comparable sensitivity to most toxicants (Philippe et al. (in review)). In combination, with both of these options, a range finding experiment should be conducted to select the nominal concentration range. For acute testing, researchers should aim for concentration treatments with 100% mortality, intermediate mortality and 0% mortality after 24 h of exposure to the toxicant. For chronic testing, it is advisable to run the range finding experiment for two weeks to verify if larval mortality in the condition with the highest test concentrations does not exceed 10% during this reference period.
The protocol can serve as a baseline to perform acute and chronic exposure to waterborne pollutants on N. furzeri, examining potential effects of stressors both at the individual and cellular level. It can also be used to perform multi-stressor research to accommodate a higher ecological relevance, mixing different toxic compounds or studying interactive effects between pollution and other natural stressors (e.g. predation) or anthropogenic stressors (e.g. warming due to climate change).