$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) causes a wide range of mild to severe herpetic diseases including herpes labialis, genital herpes, stromal keratitis, and encephalitis. Once infected, the virus establishes a lifelong latent infection in ganglia neurons. Occasionally, the virus can be reactivated by various reasons such as fever, stress, and immune suppression1, leading to recurrent herpes infection. Infected cell protein 0 (ICP0) is a key viral regulator crucial for both lytic and latent HSV-1 infection. It transactivates downstream virus genes via counteracting the host intrinsic/innate antiviral defenses2,3. ICP0 has an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, which targets several cell factors for proteasome-dependent degradation3. It also interacts with various cell pathways to regulate their activities and subsequently to offset host antiviral restrictions3. ICP0 is known to locate at different subcellular compartments as the infection proceeds3,4,5. The protein has a lysine/arginine-rich nuclear localization signal (NLS) located at residues 500 to 5066. Upon de novo synthesis at early HSV-1 infection, ICP0 is immediately imported into the nucleus. It is first detected at a dynamic nuclear structure termed nuclear domain 10 (ND10)7. The E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of ICP0 triggers the degradation of ND10 organizer proteins, promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein, and speckled protein 100 kDa (Sp100)8,9,10. After the loss of organizer proteins, ND10 nuclear bodies are dispersed and ICP0 is diffused to fill the entire nucleus4,11.
Interestingly, after the onset of viral DNA replication, ICP0 disappears from the nucleus. It is solely found in the cytoplasm, suggesting the occurrence of a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation late in HSV-1 infection4,12. The requirement of the DNA replication implies the potential involvement of a late viral protein(s) in facilitating the cytoplasmic translocation of HSV-1 ICP04,12. Apparently ICP0 trafficking among different compartments during infection empowers ICP0 to modulate its interactions to various cellular pathways in a spatial-temporal fashion, and therefore coordinate its multiple functions to fine tune the balance between the lytic and latent HSV-1 infection13. To better understand ICP0 multifunctionality and the coordination of ICP0 functional domains throughout the lytic infection, we carefully dissected the molecular basis of the dynamic ICP0 translocation12. To conduct the mechanistic studies previously reported12, we have applied an immunofluorescent staining method to visualize ICP0 subcellular localization at different infection status under confocal microscope. We have also developed a quantitative protocol to analyze the nuclear vs. cytoplasmic distribution of ICP0 using the confocal software. The population of HSV-1 infected cells was tabulated throughout the infection phases and the trends of ICP0 movement were analyzed, under different biochemical treatments12. Here we describe the detailed protocol that documents ICP0 translocation in HSV-1 infection. We propose that this method can be adopted as a general method to study the nuclear vs. cytoplasmic translocation for other viral or cellular proteins, which can serve as an alternative to live imaging when the live imaging technique is inapplicable due to problems such as labeling method, signal intensity, or protein abundance.