$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol describes the dissection and culture of primary hippocampal neurons from prenatal mouse pups at embryonic day 18. The use of primary neurons cultured from rodents is one of the most fundamental methodologies developed in modern neurobiology22. Although immortalized cell lines can model certain aspects of neurons, their nature as tumor-derived cells, failure to develop defined axons, and continued cell division raises doubts whether they faithfully recapitulate properties of post-mitotic neurons in vivo23. Another alternative to primary neurons is the use of human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs). The technology for using HiPSCs, especially those that are patient-derived, has advanced rapidly in recent years24. However, there are still limitations to working with HiPSCs including variability between cell lines, lack of functional maturity, and differences in epigenetic profiles25. Although there are also limitations to working with the reductionist model of primary rodent neurons, cultured neurons retain the post-mitotic nature of neurons in vivo. Also, the expansive molecular biology tools and genetic modifications available for mice favors the use of primary neurons over HiPSCs for many applications, and mouse studies can be easily translated to the more complex in vivo organism without losing the experimental genetic system. For these reasons, many researchers use primary rodent neurons to verify key aspects, if not the bulk, of their research.
For certain assays, neurons may be analyzed directly following isolation from the brain ex vivo. This is particularly desirable for experiments involving adult mice that can be subjected to specific experimental conditions or that may depend on interactions of multiple cell types; however, there are several issues that limit the type of analyses that can be done. It is technically challenging to prepare a single cell suspension of neurons from the brains of adult mice because neurons are uniquely interconnected and ensheathed by myelin26. Non-enzymatic methods of tissue trituration are inefficient at dissociating the tissue and cause cell death, whereas enzymatic preparations often cleave cell surface antigens27. Furthermore, while myelin is largely absent from embryonic mice, it comprises about 20% of the adult brain, and can impair viable cell isolation and impede flow cytometry analysis28. Many of the techniques that have been developed ultimately strip neurons of their cytosol and leave small, rounded cell bodies that consist primarily of nuclei29. Although this is acceptable for some analyses, this is not appropriate for quantifying cytoplasmic or extracellular protein expression. Furthermore, the reductionist cell culture system allows testing specific mechanistic questions on a shorter time scale than is frequently possible with an in vivo system.
Also described in this protocol are methods for stimulating MHCI expression pharmacologically with IFNβ, and the quantification of extracellular MHCI expression by flow cytometry. Stimulation by IFNβ is a useful positive control for testing other experimental conditions, but it may be noted that IFNγ and kainic acid can also stimulate MHCI expression in neurons9,30, while tetrodotoxin decreases MHCI expression14. Previous methods for detecting MHCI expression relied on in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis14,15,20,31. While mRNA-based assays, such as in situ hybridization and qRT-PCR, can determine the spatiotemporal localization, cell type specificity, and levels of gene transcription, these assays cannot assess protein translation or transport to the plasma membrane. Immunohistochemical and western blot analysis can determine differences in protein expression and potentially cellular localization but can be difficult to accurately quantify. Furthermore, many MHCI antibodies recognize the complex’s tertiary structure, and are highly sensitive to conformational changes. Thus permeabilization or denaturing conditions result in loss of MHCI immunoreactivity32. The method presented here uses in situ immunostaining for MHCI, which allows for recognition of the protein by the antibody in its native conformation, followed by fixation and permeabilization methods.
With slight modifications, the methods described here can be used to culture other neuronal populations or to assess expression of other extracellular proteins of interest. Noted in this protocol are easy modifications that can be made in order to culture cortical neurons, but the methods described here may also be used to culture other neuronal populations, such as striatal neurons33. Furthermore, although this protocol specifies immunostaining of MHCI and NeuN, other cellular markers can be identified in a similar manner. In general, extracellular markers can be treated like MHCI and intracellular markers can be treated like NeuN. However, it should be noted that during the cellular dissociation step, axonal projections are severed from the soma. Because the gating strategy defined here screens out cellular debris and focuses on neuronal nuclei marker NeuN, proteins that are expressed exclusively in axonal projections may not be detected.
Until recently, neurons were thought to express MHCI only in response to damage, infection, or in vitro cytokine stimulation in order to engage cytotoxic CD8+ T cells9. New research has elucidated another function of MHCI in regulating synaptic connections during development13. The protocol described here uses IFNβ to stimulate MHCI expression in wildtype cultured neurons, but similar methods may be used with a variety of cellular stimuli or genetic modifications to test specific hypotheses. This method will enable researchers to investigate the molecular mechanisms that regulate MHCI expression, which will improve understanding of the dichotomous role of MHCI on these two distinct cellular functions.