Method Article

Thermal Limits Determination for Zooplankton Using a Heat Block

1.5K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/64762

⸱

November 18th, 2022

 ,  , 
1Biology Department, Swarthmore College

In This Article

Summary

The present protocol illustrates the use of commercially available components to generate a stable and linear thermal gradient. Such gradient can then be used to determine the upper thermal limit of planktonic organisms, particularly invertebrate larvae.

Abstract

Thermal limits and breadth have been widely used to predict species distribution. As the global temperature continues to rise, understanding how thermal limit changes with acclimation and how it varies between life stages and populations are vital for determining the vulnerability of species to future warming. Most marine organisms have complex life cycles that include early planktonic stages. While quantifying the thermal limit of these small early developmental stages (tens to hundreds of microns) helps identify developmental bottlenecks, this process can be challenging due to the small size of target organisms, large bench space requirement, and high initial fabrication cost. Here, a setup that is geared toward small volumes (mL to tens of mL) is presented. This setup combines commercially available components to generate a stable and linear thermal gradient. Production specifications of the setup, as well as procedures to introduce and enumerate live versus dead individuals and compute lethal temperature, are also presented.

Introduction

Thermal tolerance is key to organisms' survival and function1,2. As the planet continues to warm due to anthropogenic carbon emissions, increasing attention is being paid to the determination and application of thermal limits3. Various endpoints, such as mortality, failure to develop, and loss of mobility, have been used to determine both upper and lower thermal limits4. These thermal limits are often considered a proxy for an organism's thermal niche. This information is in turn used to identify species that are more vulnerable to global warming, as well as predict future species distribution and the resulting species interactions3,5,6,7. However, determining thermal limits, especially for small planktonic organisms, can be challenging.

For planktonic organisms, particularly the larval stages of marine invertebrates, the thermal limit can be determined through chronic exposure. Chronic exposure is achieved by rearing larvae at several temperatures over days to weeks and determining the temperature at which larval survivorship and/or developmental rate reduces8,9,10. However, this approach is rather time-consuming and requires large incubators and experience in larval husbandry (see reference11 for a good introduction to culturing marine invertebrate larvae).

Alternatively, acute exposure to thermal stress can be used to determine thermal limits. Often, this determination approach involves placing small vials with larvae in temperature-controlled dry baths12,13,14, leveraging thermal gradient functions in PCR thermal cyclers15,16, or putting glass vials/microcentrifuge tubes along a thermal gradient generated by applied heating and cooling on the ends of large aluminum blocks with holes in which the vials fit snuggly17,18,19. Typical dry baths generate a single temperature; hence, multiple units must be operated simultaneously to assess performance across a range of temperatures. Thermal cyclers generate a gradient but only accommodate a small sample volume (120 µL) and require careful manipulations. Similar to thermal cyclers, large aluminum blocks create linear and stable temperature gradients. Both approaches can be coupled with logistic or probit regression to compute the lethal temperature for 50% percent of the population (LT50)12,20,21. However, the aluminum blocks used were ~100 cm long; this size demands a large lab space and access to specialized computer numerical control milling machines to drill the holes. Together with using two research-grade water baths to maintain the target temperature, the financial cost of assembling the setup is high.

Therefore, this work aims to develop an alternative means to generate a stable, linear temperature gradient with commercially available parts. Such a product must have a small footprint and should be able to be easily used for acute thermal stress exposure experiments for planktonic organisms. This protocol is developed with zooplankton that is <1 mm in size as target organisms, and thus, it was optimized for the use of a 1.5 or 2 mL microcentrifuge tube. Larger study organisms will require containers larger than the 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes used and enlarged holes in the aluminum blocks.

In addition to making the experimental apparatus more accessible, this work aims to simplify the data processing pipeline. While commercial statistical software provides routines to compute LT50 using logistic or probit regression, the licensing cost is non-trivial. Therefore, an easy-to-use script that relies on the open-source statistical program R22 would make data analysis more accessible.

This protocol shows how a compact heat block can be fabricated with commercially available parts and be applied to exposing zooplankton (larvae of the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus) to acute heat stress to determine their upper thermal limit.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Fabrication of the heat block

  1. Wire the 120 V, 100 W strip heater to the rheostat (see Table of Materials).
  2. Prepare the 20.3 cm x 15.2 cm x 5 cm (8 in x 5 in x 2 in) block of aluminum by drilling 60 holes in a 6 x 10 grid (see Table of Materials). Ensure that the holes are spaced 2 cm from center to center in both directions. Each should be 1.1 cm in diameter and 4.2 cm deep (Figure 1).
    NOTE: Perform the drilling on a milling machine or drill press with high-speed steel drill bits. The heating element and cooling element were both chosen to cover as much of the contact surface of the 15.2 cm x 5 cm surfaces as possible.
  3. Drill two additional holes on one of the 20.3 cm x 5 cm surfaces between the 1st and 2nd column and the 9th and 10th column, matching the size of the temperature controller probes (see Table of Materials).
  4. Construct a case from 1.2 cm (0.5 in) clear acrylic sheets (see Table of Materials) to both hold the elements in place and insulate the completed heat block. Use two layers of acrylic to insulate the back side of the heating element (Figure 1).
  5. In the final assembly, apply thermal paste (see Table of Materials) to maximize heat conductance from the heating element into the block and from the block to the cooling element.

2. Determination of thermal gradient settings

  1. Connect the water bath/aquarium chiller with Tygon tubing (see Table of Materials). Insulate the tubing with foam pipe insulation as needed.
  2. Insert the thermostat probe into the holes on the side of the aluminum block. Ensure that probe 1 is positioned near the heating element.
  3. Place microcentrifuge tubes filled to the brim (1.5 mL) with tap water in all the milled holes (60 tubes total).
  4. Turn on the temperature controller and set the stop heating temperature of probe 1 to 35-37 °C and probe 2 to 21.5-22.5 °C.
    NOTE: The proposed thermostat has two outlets that operate independently; only probe 1 is used for regulating warm temperature in this particular use case. Therefore, set the temperature of probe 2 to that of the low-end temperature.
  5. Rotate the rheostat to turn on the heating element and set it to medium.
  6. Turn on the water bath/aquarium chiller and set the chiller temperature to 15 °C.
  7. Check that the block is warm on one end and cool on the other after 10 min.
    CAUTION: The exposed ends of the heating element can be hot; do not touch them.
  8. Check the temperature inside each microcentrifuge tube using a thermocouple with a K-type electrode (see Table of Materials) every 10 min afterward. The temperature will stabilize after ~60 min and appear linear (Figure 2).
  9. Adjust the values of the endpoints by changing the settings of the temperature controller and the water bath as needed.

3. Thermal exposure and live:dead enumeration

NOTE: Step 2 can be omitted once the desired settings for the temperature gradient are determined.

  1. Turn on the recirculating water bath and heater and set them to 15 °C and 37 °C, respectively, to generate a temperature gradient from 19.5 °C to 37 °C.
  2. To ensure the thermal gradient is linear, place microcentrifuge tubes filled to the brim (1.5 mL) with tap water in all the milled holes (60 tubes total).
  3. Let the heat block reach the set temperature by waiting 45-60 min. Check the temperature inside each microcentrifuge tube using a thermocouple with a K-type electrode to see if it has reached the expected temperature. Note these temperatures.
  4. If the study organisms are >500 µm in size and can be easily transferred from one container to another (e.g., a copepod), fill a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube with 750 µL of 0.45 µm filtered seawater. Alternatively, if the study organisms are small, fill a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube with 250 µL of 0.45 µm filtered seawater.
    NOTE: For the representative data, larvae of the sand dollar Dendraster excentrics, which are 2 , 4, and 6 days post-fertilization, were used (see Table of Materials). The average (± S.D., n = 15 for each age) size of these individuals was 152 ± 7 µm, 260 ± 17 µm, and 292 ± 14 µm, respectively. Given these larvae can be easily concentrated (step 3.5), the microcentrifuge tubes were filled with 750 µL of filtered seawater.
  5. Concentrate the study organisms' culture with reverse filtering (i.e., place the mesh in the container holding the study organisms and remove water through the top of the mesh), so that the study organisms remain in the bottom of the beaker11.
    NOTE: A 30 µm nylon mesh was used for the larval sand dollars studied (see Table of Materials).
  6. Rinse the concentrated animal sample with filtered seawater (e.g., when culturing with algal food items or other chemicals). Repeat the reverse filtering once more to concentrate the animal sample.
  7. Place a known number of individual organisms into the half-filled microcentrifuge tubes. Count the small planktonic organisms under a dissecting microscope (see Table of Materials) and transfer them with glass Pasteur pipettes.
    NOTE: The number of organisms to place is size dependent; for larval sand dollars that were ~200 µm in size, 20 individuals per microcentrifuge tube was appropriate.
    CAUTION: Glass pipettes are more desirable than plastic pipettes as some planktonic organisms are hydrophobic and will stick to plastic surfaces.
  8. Add 0.45 µm filtered seawater to the microcentrifuge tubes containing animals until the final volume is 1 mL.
  9. To allow the organisms to gradually warm up to the desired experimental temperature, place the microcentrifuge tubes with animals, prepared in step 3.7, into the heat block starting from the cold end. Place pairs of microcentrifuge tubes on each row (12 tubes total).
  10. Wait 10 min.
  11. Move the pairs of microcentrifuge tubes inserted at step 3.9 to the adjacent drilled holes with warmer temperatures. Place additional pairs of microcentrifuge tubes in each row at the cold end. Each row will now have four tubes. Wait another 10 min.
  12. Continue to add microcentrifuge tubes with animals by shifting their positions from the colder end to the warmer end in pairs. Wait 10 min between each shift until the heat block is completely filled.
    NOTE: Steps 3.9-3.12 are considered a ramping-up phase to increase the temperature experienced by the study organisms gradually.
  13. Let the animals incubate at the designated temperature for 2 h. This step is the constant temperature exposure phase of the experiment.
    1. Check the temperature of the microcentrifuge tubes with a thermocouple every hour if the incubation period exceeds 2 h.
      NOTE: Adjust the incubation time based on the experimental needs. If the incubation is longer than 2 h, check the temperature of the tubes at regular time intervals with a thermocouple in case of unforeseen equipment failure. To minimize disturbance to the study organisms, randomly place six or more microcentrifuge tubes filled only with filtered seawater into the block for temperature monitoring.
  14. At the end of the incubation period, measure the temperature inside each microcentrifuge tube using a thermocouple with a K-type electrode. Note these temperatures.
  15. Remove all 60 microcentrifuge tubes with animals and place them in pre-labeled holders.
  16. Incubate the tubes (step 3.14) at the predetermined temperature, such as the rearing temperature, for 1 h, which is the recovery period.
    NOTE: The recovery period can be species-specific. For the larval sand dollar, the rearing temperature was 18 °C, and thus the sample was placed in an environmental chamber. Consult relevant literature and/or conduct a trial experiment to ensure the live:dead count was not affected by the length of the recovery period. In the representative data, the number of animals alive after 1 h was the same as after 12 or 24 h of recovery.
  17. To enumerate the proportion of study organism that is alive after the thermal exposure, transfer the contents of an individual microcentrifuge tube onto a 35 mm Petri dish using a glass pipette.
  18. Observe and note the relative number of individuals that are still active (alive) and those that have seized swimming or dissolved (dead) under a dissecting microscope. Ensure that the total number of individuals observed equals the number of individuals placed into the tubes in step 3.7. Check the side of the microcentrifuge tubes and Petri dish for individuals if the numbers do not match.

4. Computation of LT50

  1. Generate a data table in CSV format with at least the following headers: grouping variable of interest, temperature of the tube in °C, number of individuals alive, and number of individuals dead.
    NOTE: For the representative data, the grouping variable of interest is replaced by age since the goal is to compare between age groups.
  2. To fit the data with logistic regression, use a generalized linear model with a binomial distribution. Supplementary Coding File 1 shows an example sample script using the open-source software R22.
  3. To determine the median upper thermal limit (LT50), compute the predictor value (i.e., temperature) at which 50% of the individuals survived. Supplementary Coding File 2 shows an example script using the function dose.p from the MASS23 in R22.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The goal of this protocol is to determine the upper thermal limit of zooplankton. To do so, a stable and linear thermal gradient is needed. The proposed setup was able to generate a thermal gradient ranging from 14 °C to 40 °C by setting the water bath temperature to 8 °C and the heater to 39 °C (Figure 2A). The temperature gradient can be narrowed and shifted by changing the endpoint values. A thermal gradient with a narrower range (19 °C to 37 °C) was also generated by setting the heater t...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This protocol provides an accessible and customizable approach to determine the thermal limits of small plankton organisms through acute thermal exposure. The 10-hole design and flexible temperature endpoints, controlled by the water bath at the lower end and the heater at the upper end, enable one to determine LT50 with precision. Using this approach, a difference in the thermal limit that is <1 °C could be detected (Figure 3). This approach provides a rapid determination...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Faculty Research Fund of the Swarthmore College [KC] and the Robert Reynolds and Lucinda Lewis '70 Summer Research Fellowship for BJ.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.45 µm membrane filterVWR74300-042
½” Acrylic sheetMcMaster-Carr8560K266Used to construct a ridged case with sufficient insulation.
1 mL syringeVWR76290-420
2 Channel 7 Thermocouple Types DataloggerOmega EngineeringHH506ACan be replaced with any thermometer that will fit inside a microcentrifuge tube
Automatic pipette Ranin 
Bolt- and Clamp-Mount Strip Heater
with 430 Stainless Steel Sheath, 120V AC, 1-1/2" Wide, 100W		McMaster-Carr3619K32
Crystal Sea Bioassay MixPentairCM2BUse to make aritifical seawater 
Denraster excentricusM-Rep Sand dollars from California 
Dissecting microscope Nikon SMZ645
DIYhz Aluminum Water Cooling Block, Liquid Water Cooler Heat Sink System for PC Computer CPU Graphics Radiator Heatsink Endothermic Head Silver(40 mm x 120 mm x 12 mm)AmazonConnects to water bath and used to cool one end of the block.
Easy-to-Machine MIC6 Cast Aluminum Sheet 2" thick 8" x 8" McMaster-Carr86825K953Machined to 2" x 6" x 8" with 60 equally spaced holes (11 mm dia., 42 mm depth) with two addition holes drilled in one side for thermostat probes.
Economical Flexible Polyethylene Foam Pipe InsulationMcMaster-Carr4530K121Covers the plastic tubing between chiller and block to reduce heat loss. Can be omitted if temperature range is close to room temperature 
EVERSECU 72w 110-240v Aquarium Water Chiller Warmer/Cooler Temperature Controller for Fish Shrimp Tank Marine Coral Reef Tank Below 20 L/30 L Aquarium ChillerAmazonCan be used in place of the lab-grade water bath 
Example with larval sand dollar 
GENNEL 100 g Silver Silicone Thermal Conductive Compound Grease Paste For GPU CPU IC LED Ovens CoolingAmazonImproves the thermal conductance between the block and the heating and cooling elements.
Inkbird WiFi Reptile Thermostat Temperature Controller with 2 Probes and 2 Outlets, IPT-2CH Reptiles Heat Mat Thermostat (Max 250 W per Outlet)AmazonMonitors hot and cold ends. Maintains hot end in range
Lauda Ecoline Silver Air-Cooled Refrigerated CirculatorsVWR89202-386Can be replaced with an aquarium chiller 
Microcentrifuge TubesVWR76019-014If larger animals are used, scanilation vials (VWR 66022-004) is a good alternative 
Nitex mesh filter Self madeUsed hot glue to attached Nitex mesh to 1/2" PVC tubing 
Pasteur pipetteVWR14673-010
Potassium Chloride (0.35 M) Millpore-SigmaP3911-500G
R statistical software. The R Project for Statistical Computing
Syringe needleVWR89219-346Depending on size of target organism gague 14 and 16 can be used
Tygon Tubing McMaster-Carr5233K65Adjust to match the chiller and block used 
Zoo Med Repti Temp RheostatChewy.comRated to 150 W and rewired to feed directly into the heating element. Used to control rate of heat output

References

  1. Dowd, W. W., King, F. A., Denny, M. W. Thermal variation, thermal extremes and the physiological performance of individuals. Journal of Experimental Biology. 218 (12), 1956-1967 (2015).
  2. García, F. C., Bestion, E., Warfield, R., Yvon-Durocher, G. Changes in temperature alter the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (43), 10989-10994 (2018).
  3. Sinclair, B. J., et al. Can we predict ectotherm responses to climate change using thermal performance curves and body temperatures. Ecology Letters. 19 (11), 1372-1385 (2016).
  4. Lutterschmidt, W. I., Hutchison, V. H. The critical thermal maximum: history and critique. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 75 (10), 1561-1574 (1997).
  5. Bennett, J. M., et al. The evolution of critical thermal limits of life on Earth. Nature Communications. 12 (1), 1198(2021).
  6. Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E., Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nature Climate Change. 2 (9), 686-690 (2012).
  7. Deutsch, C. A., et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (18), 6668-6672 (2008).
  8. Collin, R., Chan, K. Y. K. The sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus lives close to the upper thermal limit for early development in a tropical lagoon. Ecology and Evolution. 6 (16), 5623-5634 (2016).
  9. Wang, W., Ding, M. -w, Li, X. -x, Wang, J., Dong, Y. -w Divergent thermal sensitivities among different life stages of the pulmonate limpet Siphonaria japonica. Marine Biology. 164 (6), 1-10 (2017).
  10. Mak, K. K. -Y., Chan, K. Y. K. Interactive effects of temperature and salinity on early life stages of the sea urchin Heliocidaris crassispina. Marine Biology. 165 (3), 1-11 (2018).
  11. Strathmann, R. R. Culturing larva of marine invertebrates. Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin and Other Marine Invertebrates. , Humana Press. Totowa, NJ. 1-25 (2014).
  12. Stillman, J. H., Somero, G. N. A comparative analysis of the upper thermal tolerance limits of Eastern Pacific porcelain crabs, Genus Petrolisthes: Influences of latitude, vertical Zonation, acclimation, and phylogeny. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 73 (2), 200-208 (2000).
  13. Sasaki, M. C., Dam, H. G. Integrating patterns of thermal tolerance and phenotypic plasticity with population genetics to improve understanding of vulnerability to warming in a widespread copepod. Global Change Biology. 25 (12), 4147-4164 (2019).
  14. Sasaki, M. C., Dam, H. G. Genetic differentiation underlies seasonal variation in thermal tolerance, body size, and plasticity in a short-lived copepod. Ecology and Evolution. 10 (21), 12200-12210 (2020).
  15. Kelly, M. W., Sanford, E., Grosberg, R. K. Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1727), 349-356 (2012).
  16. Rivera, H. E., Chen, C. -Y., Gibson, M. C., Tarrant, A. M. Plasticity in parental effects confers rapid larval thermal tolerance in the estuarine anemone Nematostella vectensis. Journal of Experimental Biology. 224 (5), 236745(2021).
  17. Sewell, M. A., Young, C. M. Temperature limits to fertilization and early development in the tropical sea urchin Echinometra lucunter. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 236 (2), 291-305 (1999).
  18. Walther, K., Crickenberger, S. E., Marchant, S., Marko, P. B., Moran, A. L. Thermal tolerance of larvae of Pollicipes elegans, a marine species with an antitropical distribution. Marine Biology. 160 (10), 2723-2732 (2013).
  19. Byrne, M., Gall, M. L., Campbell, H., Lamare, M. D., Holmes, S. P. Staying in place and moving in space: contrasting larval thermal sensitivity explains distributional changes of sympatric sea urchin species to habitat warming. Global Change Biology. 28 (9), 3040-3053 (2022).
  20. Zippay, M. L., Hofmann, G. E. Physiological tolerances across latitudes: thermal sensitivity of larval marine snails (Nucella spp). Marine Biology. 157 (4), 707-714 (2010).
  21. Collin, R., Rebolledo, A. P., Smith, E., Chan, K. Y. K. Thermal tolerance of early development predicts the realized thermal niche in marine ectotherms. Functional Ecology. 35 (8), 1679-1692 (2021).
  22. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. , Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).
  23. Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Fourth edn. , Springer. (2002).
  24. Fumo, J. T., et al. Contextualizing marine heatwaves in the southern California bight under anthropogenic climate change. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 125 (5), (2020).
  25. Wheeler, M. W., Park, R. M., Bailer, A. J. Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal. 25 (5), 1441-1444 (2006).
  26. Kingsolver, J. G., MacLean, H. J., Goddin, S. B., Augustine, K. E. Plasticity of upper thermal limits to acute and chronic temperature variation in Manduca sexta larvae. Journal of Experimental Biology. 219 (9), 1290-1294 (2016).
  27. Kuo, E. S. L., Sanford, E. Geographic variation in the upper thermal limits of an intertidal snail: implications for climate envelope models. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 388, 137-146 (2009).
  28. Hammond, L. M., Hofmann, G. E. Thermal tolerance of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus early life history stages: mortality, stress-induced gene expression and biogeographic patterns. Marine biology. 157 (12), 2677-2687 (2010).
  29. Sasaki, M., Dam, H. G. Global patterns in copepod thermal tolerance. Journal of Plankton Research. 43 (4), 598-609 (2021).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Zooplankton Heat BlockTemperature GradientPlanktonic OrganismsCritical TemperatureMicrocentrifuge TubesDissecting MicroscopeLogistic RegressionLarval Sand DollarsAcclimation Effects

Related Articles