The critical steps of this video article were during washing and amylase treatment of the cells. While washing the slides, the key step was using a plastic squeezable washing bottle and letting the water gently run through the sample on the slide and not aiming directly onto the samples. Even the slightest direct water pressure would cause the cells to come off the slide. Another key step was to use the same slide for ± amylase conditions. After the PBMCs were adhered to the slide, the slide was carefully placed into a beaker so only half of the smear was exposed to the amylase solution. This step provides a robust control because the blood cells are from the same slide, thus minimizing confounding variables that may occur due to slight timing variations. The cells stuck well with no treatment, so the additional cost and time involved with poly-L-lysine or polyethylene glycol coating for example would not be warranted.
Through troubleshooting the optimal activity of amylase was determined. For muscle sections, it was noted that the optimal activity of amylase was observed within 1 hr of incubation. At longer times the muscle sections would slowly peel off the slide, while at shorter times amylase did not adequately remove the PAS-signal. The timing for the amylase incubation for PBMC slides had to be reduced relative to the muscle-sample timing (which was 1 hr) down to only 15 min. Longer times caused PBMCs to come off the slide, while shorter times did not effectively impact the PAS-signal. One modification to the standard protocol of PAS staining was changing the method of washing the slides. Manufacturer’s instructions indicated to wash the slides with running tap water, which caused the cells to come off the slides. The modification was to wash the slides with squeezable washing bottle to preserve the cells. As described in the critical steps section, it was very important not to directly apply water pressure on the cells.
There are some limitations in this technique. The muscle cell membrane was stained along with punctate granules in the cytoplasm of the muscle cell. The granules were eliminated by amylase treatment and therefore likely to be glycogen, while the membrane staining was insensitive to amylase. The identity of the PAS-positive particles on the cell membrane is not known. It could be the muscle basement (perimysium) membrane. This membrane surrounds the muscle fascicles and due to its high glycoprotein content it is known to be PAS positive. Another limitation of PAS staining is that glycogen granules must be at least 50 nm in diameter to be visible by conventional light microscopy. Thus, smaller glycogen granules could be present in a cell, but still register negative on a PAS test. The second method used overcomes this limitation by providing detection of glycogen in a lysate. In combination with a standard curve this can be used to determine the exact amount of glycogen. Although this technique is highly quantifiable and is not limited by the size of granules, it does itself have certain limitations. Glycogen granules are complex branched structures with many accessory proteins and chemical cross-links, making it unlikely that hydrolysis enzymes fully dissolve an entire glycogen molecule13. Thus, the enzymatic-detection (like the PAS technique) may under-represent the actual amount of glycogen in a sample. One way to handle this limitation is with electron microscopy which resolves even the smallest glycogen granules14. One would have to employ a combination of these techniques, PAS-staining, enzymatic digestion, and electron microscopy for the most comprehensive characterization of glycogen.
This article and video demonstrates the periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining technique adapted for the use on PBMCs. The significance of this study is seen in the choice of using PBMCs over blood smear, which made it more feasible to enumerate lymphocytes. Initially, a classic blood-smear technique was tested, however the majority of cells on the slide were red blood cells and possibly neutrophils (Figure 4C). To concentrate the lymphocytes, PBMCs were purified from blood using standard density gradient technique. Using a technique similar to a blood-smear, the PBMCs readily adhered for the duration of the PAS procedure, which has many vigorous washing steps. The PAS technique has been used for decades to determine glycogen levels in muscle tissue biopsies, which are cut into thin sections and adhered to slides. PAS staining was chosen over other carbohydrate staining chemicals due to its high reliability and the presence of expected results in literature. A mouse (Mus spretus) muscle sections was used as a positive control and found, as expected, that 37% of cells were PAS-positive9. In terms of cost and time, preparing PBMC is more onerous than a blood smear, but there are several advantages. Firstly, the preparation is more enriched in lymphocytes, which are the cells of interest for projects that center on autoimmunity. If blood smears were used, lymphocytes would be the minority, making it challenging to find the cell of interest. One would have to prepare and analyze far more slides to get the same numbers you would get with a few PBMC slides. Researchers would be very interested in using our new optimized technique in autoimmunity projects related to Type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, etc. where T and B lymphocytes and NK cells play a role. Of course, for other applications where erythrocytes or neutrophils are of interest the blood smear would be recommended. The other advantage is that PBMCs can be used for studying human lymphocyte biology in vitro.
An ongoing research is investigating the source of glycogen in PBMCs. In the future, it is planned to measure glycogen content in the context of multiple sclerosis, a T lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune disease that affects an estimated 2.3 million people worldwide as of 201315,16. What are the small and large cells in the PBMC samples? Cells at 5 µm are consistent with the lymphoid lineage in their resting state. T lymphocyte, B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and other minor subsets are within this size range. The larger PBMCs are likely composed of activated lymphocytes, which grow bigger as they receive inflammatory signals from the immune system, and monocytes from the myeloid lineage. Advanced cell sorting techniques such as fluorescent activated cell sorting or magnetic-activated cell sorting are required to further refine the subset that expresses glycogen.
Hematoxylin counter staining was used when the staining was done on whole blood. This enabled us to distinguish monocytes from erythrocytes (Figure 4C). When the staining was done on PBMCs, since all cells were mononuclear, there was no need to counter stain with hematoxylin to identify cells. Also hematoxylin was interfering with the PAS signal in the cells. In summary, we have demonstrated a PAS-staining procedure adapted for PBMCs. This technique is useful for scientists and clinicians researching autoimmunity, infection and allergy.