The heart transplantation model is frequently used to investigate I/R-injury, allograft rejection, post-transplant vasculopathy and the efficiency of immunomodulating agents. Mouse models combine many advantages like the known immunological and genetic backgrounds, the availability of many inbred and transgenic strains and relatively low experimental costs.
In 1973, a technique of abdominal heart transplantation in mice was first described by Corry et al1. In this model grafts are revascularized by end-to-side anastomoses of the ascending aorta to the recipient’s abdominal aorta and of the main pulmonary artery to the inferior vena cava. In 1991, a suture technique for cervical heart transplantation in mice was described by Chen et al2. In this model a retrograde coronary artery perfusion is established by anastomosis of the recipient’s carotid artery to the ascending aorta of the graft. The venous blood drains via the coronary sinus into the right atrium, the right ventricle and is ejected through the pulmonary artery into the recipient external jugular vein (Figure 1). In comparison to the abdominal graft implantation the cervical model is less invasive and the superficial location of the graft enables a very easy accessibility for additional follow-up examinations (e.g. palpation, echocardiography, intravital fluorescence microscopy)3,4.
Despite technical improvements5,6, a more widespread use of this model has been limited due to technical difficulties to perform sutured anastomoses of small vessels with a high incidence of anastomosis leakage and thrombosis. In 1991, Matsuura et al. introduced the cuff technique in which the vessel wall is everted over a synthetic cylinder, which greatly facilitates the model of cervical heart transplantation7. The technique was further adopted for various experimental transplant models including renal8, pancreatic9, limb10, hepatic11,12, lung13,14 and vascular transplantation15. In comparison to the suture technique the required time for anastomoses and, thus, the warm ischemia time is shorter and there are significantly less vascular complications using the cuff technique16. Moreover, it enables surgeons with little training in microsurgery to perform the operation with a high success rate. A disadvantage of the cuff technique is the prerequisite ligation of the common carotid artery, which may alter cerebral perfusion.
In this video paper we present an improved and simplified cuff technique for cervical heart transplantation in mice.