Here, we present the Magnify protocol17, an ExM variant that can retain multiple biomolecules with a single chemical anchor and expand challenging FFPE clinical specimens up to 11-fold with heat denaturation. The key changes in this protocol that distinguish it from other ExM protocols include the use of a reformulated gel that remains mechanically robust even when fully expanded, as well as the use of methacrolein as the biomolecule anchor. The most critical steps in this protocol are as follows: 1) the composition of the final gel solution; 2) the timing of the gelation steps; 3) the setup of the gelation chamber; 4) the parameters for sample homogenization; and 5) the sufficient washing of SDS from the sample before the post-expansion staining.
The most critical parameter for this protocol is the composition of the final gelling solution, particularly the concentration of the biomolecule anchor methacrolein. Different methacrolein concentrations are required to expand different tissue types (Table 3), and care must be taken to ensure this value is well-matched to the sample to be expanded. Over-anchoring with methacrolein can result in a reduced expansion factor and a loss of epitopes available for post-expansion staining, while under-anchoring, especially in FFPE clinical samples, can result in tissue cracks or distortion. Therefore, the methacrolein concentration must be optimized for unvalidated tissue types, although the optimal concentration will likely fall near or within the range presented here. While we expect that this protocol will work for most tissue types, even those we have not yet validated, it is known not to work for samples containing bone.
Beyond methacrolein, using an incorrect concentration of a critical gel ingredient (4HT or TEMED) can result in the complete failure of the experiment, either due to incomplete or no gelling (excessive 4HT) or premature gelation (excessive TEMED, reduced 4HT, or adding APS before the other components). To prevent premature gelation, it is also necessary to keep the sample and gel at 4°C and exposed to air for 30 min and to only cover the sample and place it at 37°C in a humidified chamber after the diffusion process is complete.
When constructing the gel chamber, including spacers between the two uncoated glass slides is critical, especially for thicker tissue sections such as PFA-fixed mouse brain. A lack of spacers can cause tissue compression, resulting in distorted images and inaccurate data.
The sample homogenization depends on the digestion time with the digestion buffer, as well as the digestion buffer's temperature, and composition. Inadequate homogenization can cause distortions and reduced expansion factors compared to the reported value for a given tissue type. If incomplete homogenization is suspected, the digestion time can be increased, particularly in the case of thicker tissues.
A simple yet crucial step is the adequate washing-out of the SDS from the sample with a non-ionic surfactant (such as C12E10) after the homogenization step. Any leftover SDS can result in suboptimal or entirely hindered antibody binding. Fortunately, if this is suspected, further washing and the re-application of the antibodies will often be a satisfactory solution.
The protocol provides a cost-effective alternative to current super-resolution imaging and electron microscopy techniques to interrogate nanoscale structures in various tissue samples, including in FFPE clinical specimens. The use of methacrolein and heat denaturation allows the post-expansion profiling of any biomolecules that are preserved during tissue fixation (this precludes the imaging of lipids in FFPE samples, for instance). Our protocol, as an extension of the ExM framework, is modular and likely compatible with other techniques such as optical super-resolution methods (STED18, STORM19) or iterative expansion microscopy (iExM)15. However, these have yet to be tested with the presented protocol, and the large expansion factors may present challenges, especially with fluorophore dilution. Additionally, the large size of the samples after full expansion in water necessitates care when handling (although the gel used here is more resilient than previous high-expansion factor ExM gel formulations, such as ten-fold robust expansion microscopy (TREx), to handling miscues17), and creative solutions are occasionally required to transfer and image these fully expanded gels. For instance, using wide-based implements such as a thin sheet of plastic to transfer the fully expanded gels rather than a paintbrush, or using custom-made large imaging plates (in our hands, this means laser-cut or 3D-printed plates with large pieces of #1.5 coverglass adhered to the bottom; these can be seen in the accompanying video). Most importantly, this method broadens the applicability of nanoscale imaging by allowing the nanoscale imaging of common biological and pathological sample preparations on conventional wide-field or confocal microscopes.