-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools
Biopharma

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Neuroscience
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Full Text
102,675 Views
10:07 min
May 29, 2013

DOI: 10.3791/2609-v

Robert M.J. Deacon1

1Department of Experimental Psychology,University of Oxford

Overview

This article presents protocols for assessing motor coordination in mice using various tasks, including the accelerating rotarod and horizontal bar tests. Additionally, it introduces two recently developed tests, static rods and parallel bars, which can identify motor impairments.

Key Study Components

Area of Science

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Analysis
  • Motor Coordination

Background

  • Motor coordination is crucial for understanding various neurological conditions.
  • Established tests like the rotarod have been widely used in research.
  • New tests developed at Oxford aim to enhance detection of motor impairments.
  • These tests can also serve as variables in broader behavioral studies.

Purpose of Study

  • To measure motor coordination in mice using established and new protocols.
  • To identify potential motor impairments in experimental subjects.
  • To provide a standardized approach for researchers in the field.

Methods Used

  • Accelerating rotarod test to assess grip and balance.
  • Horizontal bar test for limb strength and coordination.
  • Static rods test to evaluate orientation and balance.
  • Parallel bars test to measure overall motor coordination.

Main Results

  • Results indicate varying levels of motor coordination among tested mice.
  • Performance metrics provide insights into potential impairments.
  • New tests show promise in detecting subtle motor deficits.
  • Standardized protocols facilitate reproducibility in research.

Conclusions

  • The study successfully outlines methods for assessing motor coordination.
  • Both established and new tests are effective in identifying motor impairments.
  • Future research can build on these protocols to explore neurological conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the accelerating rotarod test?
The accelerating rotarod test measures grip and balance in mice, helping to assess motor coordination.
How do the static rods test and parallel bars test differ?
The static rods test evaluates orientation and balance, while the parallel bars test measures overall motor coordination.
What are the key metrics recorded during these tests?
Metrics include the speed at which mice fall off the apparatus and the time they remain on the test surface.
Why is it important to standardize these protocols?
Standardization ensures reproducibility and reliability in research findings across different studies.
Can these tests be used to study neurological conditions?
Yes, these tests can help identify motor impairments associated with various neurological conditions.
How long should mice acclimate before testing?
Mice should be brought to the experimental room 5 to 20 minutes before testing to ensure they are fully awake.

Protocols are presented for two established motor coordination tasks, the accelerating rotarod and horizontal bar, also two tests developed in Oxford recently, the static rods and parallel bars. These tests can detect motor impairments potentially of interest in their own right, as well as being possible variables in tests of other areas of behavior.

The overall goal of this procedure is to measure motor coordination in mice. This is accomplished by first testing on the accelerating rotor rod. Next motor coordination is tested on the onal bar.

The animal can also be tested on static rods. Lastly, performance on the parallel bars can be measured. Ultimately, results can be obtained that show whether the mouse has any impairments in motor coordination.

Generally, individuals new to this technique will struggle because of the difficulty of correctly placing the mouse on the apparatus For all of the following tests. Bring the mice to the experimental room five to 20 minutes before testing to ensure they are fully awake. The rotor rod scene here was built at the University of Oxford.

The rod is three centimeters in diameter with a series of parallel ridges on its surface, which help the mice to grip it more effectively. A flange on each side prevents the mouse from leaving the rod. They are 30 centimeters in diameter and six centimeters apart.

The rod is secured 30 centimeters from the base of the apparatus. A soft padded surface is placed at the base to cushion any falls before beginning the trial. Prepare the rotor rod by setting a start speed of four rotations per minute and an acceleration rate of 20 rotations per minute.

To begin, hold the mouse by the tail and bring it up towards the rod at a 45 degree angle below the horizontal. Quickly release the animal when it is almost touching the rod. Alternatively, the mouse can be lowered onto a dowel and the dowel will used to transfer the animal to the rod.

Start the acceleration 10 seconds after placing the mouse on the rod and note the speed at which the mouse falls off. If the mouse falls before five seconds and is likely due to poor placement by the experimenter, the result should not be recorded and the trial restarted if the mouse falls before 10 seconds. Note the time and allow the animal two more tries.

For animals that stay on past 10 seconds, record the speed at which the animal falls. Occasionally the mouse may stop walking and consequently, some assault around the rod before eventually falling. It is useful to note the speed of this occurrence.

Performance is calculated as the mean speed between trials. For example, a mouse that falls before 10 seconds once and then stays on until 12 rotations per minute. The second time scores four plus 12 divided by two equaling eight rotations per minute.

The horizontal bar measures fall limb strength and coordination while a bar two millimeters in diameter is most commonly used. Bars of larger diameter may provide more refined performance scores. Brass bars 38 centimeters long are held 49 centimeters above the bench surface by a wooden support column.

The bars are held under tension when fitted into the notches of supports that are drawn slightly together. Begin testing with the two millimeter bar. Hold the mouse by the tail and place it on the bench in front of the apparatus.

Slide it quickly. Backwards about 20 centimeters to align its body perpendicular to the bar rapidly. Raise the animal allowing it to grasp the horizontal bar at the center with only its four pores.

Release the tail while simultaneously starting a stop clock. If the mouse fails to grasp the bar and the experimenter's placement may be the cause. Do not record the fall and retest the animal after a brief rest.

If the mouse falls before five seconds, and this is apparently not due to poor placing by the experimenter, repeat up to three times in an attempt to get a score greater than five seconds. Record either the time the mouse falls or the time until one four poor touches a column with a maximum test time of 30 seconds, take the best score as the datu Right to score the horizontal bar. If the mass falls off between one and five seconds, score one between six seconds and 10 seconds.

Score two between 11 seconds and 20 seconds. Score three between 21 seconds and 30 seconds. Score four falling after 30 seconds or just staying on the bar till 30 seconds.

Scores five, and the mouse also scores five if it touches an end. Support with its four port at any time during testing. If a score of five is achieved on the two millimeter bar, the animal can then be tested on thicker bars after a brief rest.

The scoring system for the four and six millimeter bars is the same as for the two millimeter bar, and the final score is the cumulate total. Thus, a mouse that scores five on the two millimeter bar but falls from the four millimeter bar after 13 seconds. Scores five plus equals eight.

In this test for motor coordination, wooden dows or rods of varying thickness, 35 28, 22 15, and nine millimeters in diameter each 60 centimeters long affixed by a G clamp to a laboratory shelf 60 centimeters from the floor. A mark is made 10 centimeters from the end near the bench to denote the finish line. To begin place the mouse at the far end of the widest rod facing away from the shelf record the time it takes for the animal to orientate itself towards the shelf and that total transit time.

If the mouse turns upside down and clings below the rod during orientation, arbitrarily assign it to the maximum score of 120 seconds. The animal is not tested on the other rods and receives a maximum transit value as well. If the mouse falls or reaches the maximum test time of 120 seconds after orienting, do not test it on narrower rods.

A maximum score is also assigned if the mouse turns upside down while transversing the rod after orientation, return the mouse to the home cage and allow it to rest before testing. The next smaller rod. Place the animal on the smaller rod as shown earlier.

If the mouse falls off before five seconds, replace it and allow up to two more attempts. Record the time to reverse the rod or until the mouse falls off. To set up the parallel bars support two bars, one meter in length and four millimeters in diameter, 30 millimeters apart on wooden support.

Columns 60 centimeters above the floor. Place the mouse in the center of the two bars with its longitudinal axis perpendicular to the bars. Both front pores should be on one bar with both hind pores on the other bar.

Scoring is similar to that for the static rods. Two measures are taken the time until the mouse orients 90 degrees to the start position and the time until it reaches one of the end supports. Similarly, orientation and transit must be achieved without the animal turning upside down, otherwise the maximum time is allotted.

If the animal falls before five seconds, it is probably due to poor placing and the animal should be retested. A static rod was originally used to monitor the progress of disease in mutant mice with or without environmental enrichment in their home cages. The enrichment program dramatically delayed the onset of motor dysfunction on the rod, which was paralleled by a delay in the onset of hind poor clasping.

A general sign of neurological ment scrapy infected mice showed a decrease in horizontal bar performance from week 16 post-injection in rotor rod testing from week 18 and static rods from at least week 19. Hippocampal lesions had no effect on any measure of motor ability, but 1 2 9 s two SV mice were impaired relative to the C 57 black six strain on the rotor rod and static rods After its development. This technique paved the way for researchers in Huntington's disease to study the effects of environmental enrichment in Huntington's disease mutant mice.

Explore More Videos

Motor CoordinationMiceBehavioral NeuroscienceRat ReplacementMutant MouseLesioned MouseMaze TaskMorris Water MazeCognitive ImpairmentsMotor ImpairmentsNMDA AntagonistsRotarod TestHorizontal BarStatic RodsParallel Bars

Related Videos

Assessment of Motor Balance and Coordination in Mice using the Balance Beam

07:03

Assessment of Motor Balance and Coordination in Mice using the Balance Beam

Related Videos

48.9K Views

Assessing Gait by Footprint Analysis: A Method to Test Motor Coordination in Mice

02:49

Assessing Gait by Footprint Analysis: A Method to Test Motor Coordination in Mice

Related Videos

6.1K Views

The Accelerating Rotating Rod Assay or Rotarod Test: A Method to Test Motor Coordination and Learning in Mice

02:06

The Accelerating Rotating Rod Assay or Rotarod Test: A Method to Test Motor Coordination and Learning in Mice

Related Videos

11.4K Views

Measuring Progressive Neurological Disability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis

08:11

Measuring Progressive Neurological Disability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis

Related Videos

11.6K Views

Battery of Behavioral Tests Assessing General Locomotion, Muscular Strength, and Coordination in Mice

06:54

Battery of Behavioral Tests Assessing General Locomotion, Muscular Strength, and Coordination in Mice

Related Videos

14.7K Views

A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice

07:18

A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice

Related Videos

20.1K Views

Using the MouseWalker to Quantify Locomotor Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Spinal Cord Injury

07:28

Using the MouseWalker to Quantify Locomotor Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Spinal Cord Injury

Related Videos

4.4K Views

A Versatile, Behavioral Method to Investigate Thyroid Hormone Effects on Cerebellar Function

04:05

A Versatile, Behavioral Method to Investigate Thyroid Hormone Effects on Cerebellar Function

Related Videos

823 Views

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder

08:51

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder

Related Videos

2.2K Views

The Mouse Stroke Unit Protocol with Standardized Neurological Scoring for Translational Mouse Stroke Studies

10:45

The Mouse Stroke Unit Protocol with Standardized Neurological Scoring for Translational Mouse Stroke Studies

Related Videos

1.7K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • JoVE Newsroom
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code