Overview
This article presents a quantitative methodology to investigate how extracellular matrix stiffness influences the susceptibility of adherent endothelial cells to bacterial infection, specifically using Listeria monocytogenes as a model pathogen. The protocol enables high-throughput screening of multiple conditions, combining infection assays with biomechanical analysis to elucidate the interplay between matrix mechanics and host-pathogen interactions.
Key Study Components
Area of Science
- Cellular microbiology
- Mechanobiology
- Host-pathogen interactions
- Cell biomechanics
Background
- Extracellular matrix stiffness is a key mechanical cue affecting cell behavior and fate.
- The impact of matrix stiffness on host cell susceptibility to bacterial infection is not well understood.
- Bacterial infection may alter the biomechanics of host cells.
- Understanding these interactions is critical for the emerging field of host-pathogen biomechanics.
Purpose of Study
- To determine whether the stiffness of the extracellular matrix affects the susceptibility of endothelial cells to L. monocytogenes infection.
- To assess how bacterial infection alters the biomechanics of host endothelial cells.
- To develop a robust, multi-well assay for parallel analysis of these phenomena.
Methods Used
- Preparation of polyacrylamide hydrogels with tunable stiffness in 24-well plates.
- Surface functionalization and collagen coating of hydrogels for cell adhesion.
- Seeding of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) onto hydrogels.
- Infection of cells with L. monocytogenes at defined multiplicities of infection (MOI).
- Synchronization of infection via centrifugation and subsequent incubation.
- Quantification of infection using flow cytometry and immunostaining followed by microscopy.
- Live-cell imaging to monitor bacterial spread.
- Atomic force microscopy (AFM) to confirm hydrogel stiffness and assess cell biomechanics.
Main Results
- Flow cytometry revealed that infection rates of HMEC-1 cells by L. monocytogenes were approximately two-fold higher on stiff (70 kPa) versus soft (0.6 kPa) hydrogels.
- Immunostaining showed significantly more bacteria adhered to and internalized by cells on stiff matrices compared to soft ones.
- Live-cell imaging enabled visualization of bacterial spread across monolayers on different stiffness substrates.
- AFM confirmed the precise stiffness of the hydrogels and can be used to assess changes in host cell mechanics post-infection.
Conclusions
- Matrix stiffness significantly modulates the susceptibility of endothelial cells to bacterial infection.
- Bacterial infection can alter the biomechanics of host cells, and this effect may depend on matrix stiffness.
- The described multi-well assay is broadly applicable for studies of cell biomechanics and mechanobiology in the context of infection and beyond.
What is the main goal of this methodology?
The main goal is to quantitatively assess how extracellular matrix stiffness affects the susceptibility of adherent cells to bacterial infection and to study the biomechanical changes in host cells upon infection.
How is matrix stiffness controlled in this assay?
Matrix stiffness is controlled by preparing polyacrylamide hydrogels with varying concentrations of acrylamide and bis-acrylamide, allowing precise tuning of substrate rigidity.
What cell and bacterial models are used in this study?
Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) are used as the host cell model, and Listeria monocytogenes serves as the bacterial pathogen.
How is infection quantified in this protocol?
Infection is quantified using flow cytometry to measure the proportion of infected cells and immunostaining followed by microscopy to assess bacterial adhesion and internalization.
What were the key findings regarding matrix stiffness and infection?
Cells on stiffer matrices exhibited significantly higher rates of bacterial adhesion, internalization, and overall infection compared to those on softer matrices.
Can this method be adapted for other cell types or pathogens?
Yes, the protocol is adaptable to other adherent cell types and bacterial pathogens, making it broadly useful for mechanobiology and infection studies.
What safety precautions are necessary when working with pathogenic bacteria?
Strict sterile technique and biosafety measures, such as using barriers and minimizing aerosol generation, are essential to prevent contamination and exposure during the procedure.