JoVE Biology

Evaluation of Zebrafish Kidney Function Using a Fluorescent Clearance Assay

1, 1, 2

1Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 2Molecular Cell Science Research Centre, St. George's University of London

    Downloads Comments Metrics Publish with JoVE

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    Enter your email to receive a free trial:


    Enter your email below to get your free 10 minute trial to JoVE!

    Admit it, you like to watch.



    The zebrafish is a popular tool to model chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their small size makes it impossible to evaluate renal function using traditional methods. We describe a fluorescent dye kidney clearance assay1 that allows quantitative analysis of zebrafish kidney function in CKD.

    Date Published: 2/20/2015, Issue 96; doi: 10.3791/52540

    Cite this Article

    Christou-Savina, S., Beales, P. L., Osborn, D. P. Evaluation of Zebrafish Kidney Function Using a Fluorescent Clearance Assay. J. Vis. Exp. (96), e52540, doi:10.3791/52540 (2015).


    The zebrafish embryo offers a tractable model to study organogenesis and model human genetic disease. Despite its relative simplicity, the zebrafish kidney develops and functions in almost the same way as humans. A major difference in the construction of the human kidney is the presence of millions of nephrons compared to the zebrafish that has only two. However, simplifying such a complex system into basic functional units has aided our understanding of how the kidney develops and operates. In zebrafish, the midline located glomerulus is responsible for the initial blood filtration into two pronephric tubules that diverge to run bilaterally down the embryonic axis before fusing to each other at the cloaca. The pronephric tubules are heavily populated by motile cilia that facilitate the movement of filtrate along the segmented tubule, allowing the exchange of various solutes before finally exiting via the cloaca2-4. Many genes responsible for CKD, including those related to ciliogenesis, have been studied in zebrafish5. However, a major draw back has been the difficulty in evaluating zebrafish kidney function after genetic manipulation. Traditional assays to measure kidney dysfunction in humans have proved non translational to zebrafish, mainly due to their aquatic environment and small size. For example, it is not physically possible to extract blood from embryonic staged fish for analysis of urea and creatinine content, as they are too small. In addition, zebrafish do not produce enough urine for testing on a simple proteinuria ‘dipstick’, which is often performed during initial patient examinations. We describe a fluorescent assay that utilizes the optical transparency of the zebrafish to quantitatively monitor the clearance of a fluorescent dye, over time, from the vasculature and out through the kidney, to give a read out of renal function1,6-9.


    The human kidney plays a crucial role in filtering metabolic waste from the blood and recovering required solutes to sustain cellular homeostasis. There are a number of human genetic diseases that cause kidney dysfunction. The most common inherited renal disease is autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) characterized by the development of fluid filled sacs within nephritic tubules; the damage caused by cystogenesis is detrimental to kidney function10. ADPKD has an occurrence of 1:800 - 1:1,000 and accounts for 8 - 10% of patients in end stage renal failure (ESRF)11. Several genes have been implicated to cause ADPKD including polycystin-1 (PKD1) and -2 (PKD2), accounting for approximately 85% and 15% of cases respectively12,13. Furthermore, the gene products for PKD1 and -2 localize to the cilium and are fundamental to ciliogenesis14,15. There is now a recognized family of human genetic disorders, known as the ciliopathies, which affect cilia function and result in CKD16.

    The growing number of human genetic diseases affecting ciliary development and function is drawing global interest in this once considered vestigial organelle. The cilium, a hair-like cellular protrusion, is enriched with receptors and ion channels necessary for the transduction of key cell signaling events. The cilium consists of a microtubule-based axoneme, typically structured into nine radially arranged microtubule doublets with or without a central pair of singlet microtubules. The axonemal structure defines the type and mode of ciliary action. The 9+2 microtubule arrangement confers motility to the cilium where it is utilised in the movement of fluids across epithelial surfaces. The 9+0 configuration is non motile but is believed to mainly function in cellular signalling events17. Apart from CKD, the consequences of ciliary dysfunction are a set of characteristic ciliopathy features that include, obesity, retinal degeneration, polydactyly, and cognitive impairment16. However, CKD is amongst the most detrimental to the patient’s quality of life and therefore a major driving force behind the development of appropriate in vivo models for ciliary related CKD.

    The zebrafish is an excellent model to understand the etiology of human genetic disease. Their quick development, production of large number of eggs, transparent tissue, and ex utero growth allows zebrafish developmental processes to be visualized and biological events manipulated with considerable ease. Genes can be genetically altered using the recent success of genome editing tools (CRISPR18 and TALENS19), knocked down using antisense morpholino technology20, or pharmacologically regulated by the addition of compounds to their aquatic environment. Indeed, zebrafish offer a platform to undertake experiments that are not permissive in other animal models. Whilst zebrafish are relatively simple vertebrates (compared to humans) they share many functionally conserved organs, genes, and signaling processes in common with humans. For example, the zebrafish kidney is remarkably similar in structure and function compared to humans21,22. However, unlike the mammalian kidney that develops through a succession of phases, each marked by a more developed kidney (pronephros, mesonephros, and metanephros), the embryonic zebrafish only develops a pronephros, the most immature form of a kidney. Whilst millions of nephrons can be found forming the building blocks of the mammalian kidney, the zebrafish embryo only possess two. The glomeruli, which allow for the initial blood filtrate, are fused at the midline just ventral to the aorta. Blood filters through the glomeruli into the pronephric tubules that run caudally along the axis, fusing prior to exit via the cloaca. The pronephric tubules are heavily ciliated with motile cilia that are permissive to the flow of filtrate towards the caudal exit3,4. This simple pronephric structure maintains zebrafish homeostasis through several weeks of larval growth where they eventually develop into a more complex mesonephros structure21. However, the zebrafish never develops a metanephros21. Despite the zebrafish idiosyncrasies, the zebrafish nephron is segmented with gene expression profiles equal to that observed in mammals and thus offers an unrivalled in vivo model for nephrogenesis3,22.

    Routinely patients are tested for kidney function through a series of blood and urinary tests. Typically the blood is analyzed for dissolved salts, urea and creatinine. High levels of urea, creatinine and abnormal salt concentrations are indicative of problems with kidney function. Urinalysis using a colorimetric dipstick detects abnormal levels of protein, blood, pus, bacteria and sugar present in urine samples. Such tests normally require approximately 30 ml of urine or 5 - 10 ml of blood. It has been difficult to translate these types of assays to small in vivo model organisms, such as the zebrafish, mainly due to the impossible nature of collecting sufficient blood or urine to perform the assay. Here, we address the lack of appropriate zebrafish kidney function tests and describe an innovative technique for its study. By injecting a fluorescent dye into the blood stream we are able to monitor and individually quantify over time the filtration and excretion of fluorescent activity from the blood via the kidney. This method can be used to study kidney damage caused by disease, which we provide an example of.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


    Ethics Statement: Animal maintenance, husbandry, and procedures are defined and controlled by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. All animal experimentation has been carried out under licenses granted by the Home Secretary (PIL No. 70/7892) in compliance with Biological Services Management Group and the Biological Services Ethical Committee, SGUL, London, UK. All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used and to refine both procedures and husbandry in order to minimize suffering and enhance welfare.

    1. Preparation of Instruments, Anesthetic, and Fluorescent Dye

    1. Using a micropipette puller and borosilicate standard wall capillaries (without filaments) pull needles of appropriate length for microinjection (Figure 1A).
    2. Make an agarose mould for orientation of embryos for easy injection into the pericardium (Figure 1B). Glue approximately ten glass microscope slides together to form a ‘staircase’ of offset slides. For best results, use a drop of rapid set epoxy resin glue in the center of each slide.
    3. Cut out a section of approximately 78 mm in length halfway through two 10 ml plastic pipettes using a Bunsen burner heated scalpel, remove pipette ends as appropriate. Attach and glue (epoxy resin) pipette sections to the stacked glass slides to provide stability to allow the mould to dip into a 90 mm Petri dish. Make every effort to ensure the slide corners align perpendicular to the Petri dish floor. Allow glue time to set.
    4. Cast the mould in a 2% agarose solution made in fish water (obtained from the aquarium). Pour agarose into a 90 mm Petri dish and place the mould on top of the open Petri dish, permitting the stacked slide edges to submerge at an angle under the agarose surface. Leave to set on the lab bench for 30 min.
    5. Remove the slide cast and cover the slide-imprinted agarose with fresh fish water containing Tricaine anesthetic (see step 1.9) at a 1:25 ratio.
    6. Make solutions of rhodamine dextran (RD) dye. Resuspend rhodamine B 10,000 MW labeled dextran in autoclaved ultrapure water to make a stock concentration of 50 mg/ml. For microinjection, further dilute the stock to a final concentration of 5 mg/ml in autoclaved ultrapure water.
      NOTE: Pigmented cells begin to differentiate in zebrafish from 24 hr post fertilization (hpf); these can obscure fluorescent markers during image acquisition.
    7. Inhibit melanocyte formation by using N-Phenylthiourea (PTU), which blocks melanogenesis through inhibition of tyrosinase. Make a 0.003 % stock solution of PTU by dissolving PTU powder in aquarium water, heat solution at 60 °C to fully solubilize.
    8. Incubate zebrafish embryos in methylene blue solution, a mild fungicide, to prevent fungal blooms and increase survival. Add 2 ml of methylene blue stock solution, containing 0.1% Methylene blue in ultrapure water, to 1 L of aquarium water and use as a standard embryo medium.
    9. Make up a 15 mM stock concentration of Tricaine/ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt as instructed in ‘The Zebrafish Book’ 23. Anesthetize the embryos and consequently immobilized them to perform the microinjection procedure.
    10. After anesthetizing the embryos, orient them, for imaging by using the non-toxic and viscous properties of methylcellulose. To make a 200 ml preparation of 3% methylcellulose, chill 130 ml of water at -20 °C for 30 min and place on ice. Heat 70 ml of water to 80 °C in a glass beaker, add 6 g of methylcellulose, and agitate using a glass rod until all particles are wetted and evenly dispersed. Add the ice-cold water, mix, and allow the preparation to cool at 4 °C for 30 min before aliquoting into 50 ml tubes.
      NOTE: Lowering the temperature allows the methylcellulose to become soluble. The solution will become thicker as the powder hydrates. 3% methylcellulose can be stored without bacterial growth for short periods of a week at 4 °C or longer at -20 °C. Make sure the methylcellulose has reached RT before use.
    11. To perform injections of fluorescent dye into the zebrafish use a standard microinjection set-up (Figure 1C). This consists of an air compressor connected to a pressure regulator system that feeds into a straight pipette holder for use with 1.0 outer diameter capillaries. The pipette holder should be housed within an MM33 compact 3-axis control micromanipulator secured to a steel base plate by a magnetic stand. Embryos can be visualized, manipulated and injected using a stereo dissecting microscope.

    2. Zebrafish Husbandry and Pre-injection Treatment

    1. Maintain zebrafish as previously described23. Use an aquarium set-up that provides recirculating water supplied at a constant temperature of 28.5 °C, conditioned to pH 6.8 - 7.2 and conductivity of 450-550 μS with sodium bicarbonate and Instant Ocean Sea Salt, respectively. Use wildtype or transgenic zebrafish lines as appropriate to the experiment, maintaining a stocking density of 15 males to 15 females per 8 L tank. Set the fish facility photocycle to 14 hr of daylight between 9 am - 11 pm.
    2. Zebrafish spawning commences at the beginning of the photocycle, when the lights turn on in the morning. To ensure maximum eggs can be collected without disturbing the fish, submerge breeding tanks (containing mesh inserts, available from zebrafish specialists) into wildtype stock tanks the evening before collection.
    3. On the day of collection, allow 30 - 40 min for the fish to spawn, after which collect and rinse eggs using a tea strainer and fresh aquarium water. Deposit the cleaned eggs in a 90 mm Petri dish containing embryo medium and incubate at 28.5 °C.
    4. Treat the embryos with PTU to inhibit melanogenesis. At 8 hpf, transfer viable embryos in minimal liquid to fresh petri dishes containing 1:100 PTU to embryo medium and further incubate at 28.5 °C until 72 hpf.
      NOTE: PTU can cause developmental defects if used at earlier stages so should be restricted to post 8 hpf stages, but can be treated as late as 24 hpf. Late addition of PTU does not fully block eye pigmentation but is generally successful and inhibiting trunk melanocyte formation.

    3. Microinjection

    NOTE: The pericardium encases the heart but is separated for protection and ease of cardiac movement by fluid within the pericardial cavity. The aim of this procedure is to inject RD into the pericardial cavity, this allows for rapid uptake of the dye to the vasculature system.

    1. Load needles with 6 μl - diluted RD, using microloader tips and secure into the needle holder of the micromanipulator. Break the end of the needle using fine tipped forceps (Figure 1A). Move the RD solution to the tip of the needle by maximizing pulse duration to the minute setting, switch back to msec once complete.
    2. Use a stage micrometer, the pressure regulator, and refinements to needle tip length (using forceps) to adjust the size of the expelled droplet to 100 μm in diameter, this equates to a 0.5 nl volume (Figure 2A).
      NOTE: When breaking the needle, be careful not to break too much off otherwise it will make calibrating the injection volume difficult. If necessary, further break the needle tip to increase the drop size however, maintain a needle thickness that permits entry into the pericardium without excessive bending or damage to the tissue.
    3. Prior to injection, anesthetize the embryos in embryo medium containing Tricaine. Set up 2 x 35 mm Petri dishes containing 5 ml embryo medium, label one ‘Tricaine’ and the other ‘Recovery’.
    4. Add 200 μl of stock Tricaine to the appropriately labeled dish. Once ready to inject, select an individual embryo at 72 hpf and transfer in minimal liquid to the Tricaine dish. Monitor the activity of the embryo, test the embryo is anesthetized and immobilized by gentle agitation using a truncated microloader tip.
    5. Transfer the anesthetized embryo to the injection mould and orientate the embryo within an agarose trough so the left side is facing up, positioning the heart to the left of the field of view.
    6. To inject the RD into the heart, pierce the pericardium with the needle and inject 1 nl of RD into the pericardial cavity of the anaesthetized embryo (Figure 2B, right panel). Withdraw the needle after injection. Transfer the injected embryo in minimal liquid to the ‘Recovery dish’ and monitor for 1 min. Transfer the individual embryo to a 24-well plate containing 1 ml fresh embryo medium (containing PTU) and label appropriately.
      NOTE: The pericardium is tough, however there is a notable weak point at the intersection where the pericardium meets the ventro-caudal pharyngeal arches and dorso-rostral yolk sac (Figure 2B arrowhead). The needle should be directed to this groove. When the needle is in place, a firm tap of a finger on top of the micromanipulator will facilitate entry into the pericardial cavity.
    7. Repeat steps 3.2 - 3.6 for at least 10 embryos per experimental group, place each fish in a separate well and uniquely labelto permit individual experimental follow-ups. Incubate at 28.5 °C for 3 hr.

    4. Imaging Acquisition

    1. At 3 hr post injection (hpi) anesthetize embryos as previously described and transfer to a 35 mm Petri dish containing 3% methylcellulose. Gently push embryos into the methylcellulose and orientate so the lateral side can be imaged.
    2. Acquire an image of the embryo under UV, using a filter for visualization of emitted light at 570 nm (Figure 2C). After image acquisition, allow the embryo to recover before replacing in the designated well. Acquire images for all injected embryos and further incubate at 28.5 °C.
      NOTE: In this protocol we used a fluorescent stereomicroscope with a TXR filter set, a DFC300FX camera and respective application software. Make a note of the exact acquisition settings for subsequent image acquisition.
    3. At 24 hpi, acquire a second round of images as described above. Once all the images have been acquired, at both 3 hpi and 24 hpi, humanely dispose of the embryos or use for other experimental means e.g., immunohistochemistry.

    5. Image Processing

    1. Quantify fluorescent intensity of each injected embryo, at 3 hpi and 24 hpi, by analyzing images using NIH’s ImageJ software. To measure fluorescent intensity, open an image in ImageJ and specify a region of interest (roi) at 100 px2 (Edit → selection → specify).
    2. Position the heart in the center of the roi (Figure 2C), set measurements to include mean gray scale and area (Analyze → set measurements), perform measurement (Analyze → measure). Complete for each set of images, at 3 hpi and 24 hpi, per embryo and transfer average gray scale values to a spreadsheet for further processing.
      NOTE: We selected a fixed roi size of 100 px2 as this encompasses individual hearts between embryos. The heart was selected to perform measurements due to its large size that enables a convenient location to measure fluorescent content of the blood prior to entering the kidney.
    3. Perform statistical analysis using appropriate statistical software. Compare groups for statistical significance using a student’s t-test.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Representative Results

    Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a rare heterogeneous ciliopathy that affects approximately 1:160,000 people worldwide16. Patients present with a number of associated problems including polycystic kidneys, subsequently patients frequently require kidney dialysis or transplantation24. ESRF is the most common cause of death in BBS, with around 30% of patients developing CKD16. Currently, 20 non-related genes have been implicated in BBS with no published genotype-phenotype association. The BBS proteins share common protein localization domains within the cilium and basal bodies that, along with the patients’ characteristic traits, infer a ciliopathy diagnosis. BBS9 encodes Parathyoid Hormone-responsive B1 (PTHB1) protein that together with other BBS (BBS1, BBS2, BBS4, BBS5, BBS7, BBS8) proteins form the core BBSome complex responsible for the formation of the primary cilium24. Mutations in BBS9 account for 6% of BBS cases24. Furthermore, PTH has been implicated in kidney cyst formation through the promotion of renal epithelial cell proliferation, suggesting that loss of bbs9 function in zebrafish might display renal defects25. Previous reports using a bbs9 knockdown zebrafish model exclude a description of the kidney, presenting the opportunity to demonstrate the described kidney function assay26. Knockdown of bbs9 function was achieved in zebrafish by injecting, at the 1- to 4-cell stage, an antisense morpholino to block gene specific bbs9 translation and in parallel a standard negative control morpholino against an intronic mutation in human beta-globin (4 ng bbs9MO, sequence: GGCCTTAAACAAAGACATCCTGTAA and 4 ng control MO, sequence: CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA). We found that loss of bbs9 function resulted in 40% of embryos displaying pronephric cysts by 5 dpf, suggesting this was an appropriate model to analyze kidney function using the rhodamine dextran clearance assay. We observed that morphant fish have a significant reduction in their ability to clear the fluorescent dye after 24 hpi compared to controls (Figure 3) – con: 14.8 ± 1.2 SEM, n = 9; bbs9MO: 61.0 ± 10.3 SEM, n = 10; unpaired t-test P value: 0.002). To rule out the potential that reduced clearance could be due to reduced blood circulation, embryos were evaluated for heart beat and recirculating blood cells, both control and morphant fish had comparable heart rate and blood flow. These data indicate that kidney function is impaired in bbs9 morphants. Indeed, bbs9 morphant embryos develop cystic pronephric tubules concurrent with that observed in BBS patients.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1. Equipment preparation and set-up. (A) Borosilicate capillaries should be pulled for microinjection using an appropriate needle puller. The needle requires breaking with forceps (dashed line) to permit the RD to exit the needle, care should be taken not to break the needle too much rendering a needle that cannot be calibrated. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) An agarose mould for embryo manipulation and orientation can be fashioned by gluing together glass slides and plastic pipettes. (C) The standard microinjection set-up. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2. Microinjection of rhodamine dextran into the pericardial sac. (A) Calibrate the drop size to 10 increments (100 μm) on a 1 mm stage reticule. (B) Correct positioning of the needle (black arrows) into the crevasse marking the intersection between the caudal pharyngeal arch, yolk sac and heart will facilitate piercing the tissue (arrowhead). Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Rhodamine dextran can be seen rapidly taken up by the whole vasculature (white arrows). 100 px2 regions of interests covering a centralized heart (yellow square) should be used to take measurements of the mean gray value and hence pixel/fluorescent intensity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3. Knockdown of bbs9 causes defective kidney function in zebrafish. (A) Embryos injected into the pericardium with rhodamine dextran at 3 hpi and 24 hpi, top and bottom two panels respectively, in either control or bbs9 morphant embryos. Arrowheads indicate the heart; arrow indicates the formation of a pronephric cyst. (B) Percentage fluorescent intensity remaining after 24 hpi in control versus bbs9MO embryos. Error bars show the standard error of the mean (SEM), **P ≤ 0.01. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


    Zebrafish offer a valuable tool to model human genetic disease, their use as a scientific instrument for in vivo research have enabled detailed studies of the genetic breakdown of many biological systems, including the kidney. Much is now understood about how the zebrafish kidney develops and functions. The striking similarities to human nephrogenesis and homology with disease causing genes21 has illustrated how zebrafish have become fundamental in understanding how defects in gene function lead to the pathology of renal disease. Indeed, genetic manipulation can be effortlessly achieved in zebrafish using antisense morpholino knockdown technology or more advanced targeted genome editing tools such as TALENS or CRISPR. Creating knockdown or mutant models for suspected renal disease causing genes is the first step in understanding their involvement in the disease manifestation. To do this a reliable assay for kidney function is sought to indicate whether a candidate gene is likely responsible for the pathology observed in patients.

    Kidney function tests are straightforward and relatively cheap to perform on humans, generally looking at levels of solutes present in the blood or urine. However, these methods are inapplicable in zebrafish due to its small size and aquatic habitat. The rhodamine dextran assay described here utilizes the ability of pronephric tubules to filter low molecular weight components from the blood. The podocytes positioned within the bowman’s capsule of the kidney, that envelopes the capillaries of the glomerulus, allow the free passing of small molecules such as water, ionic salts and glucose through a slit diaphragm27. The filtration slits further function to prevent the loss of macro proteins from the blood. Filtration is restricted for molecules above 5 kDa and almost completely blocked at the size of serum albumin28 (approximately 65 kDa). By injecting a fluorescent dextran dye of approximately 10 kDa, at a known concentration into the pericardial cavity, we are able to measure fluorescent intensity of the blood over time. Under normal conditions approximately 85% of initial fluorescence is lost from the blood, over a 24 hr period, through secretion via the kidney. One should note that the injection into pericardial space is only possible with low MW dextran that passes freely into the vasculature. Thus, this assay only gives a read-out for the rate of clearance for low molecular weight components and does not give any information about the efficacy of glomerular filtration. The latter can be assessed more directly using high molecular weight dyes over 70 kDa, requiring injection into the vasculature and not into pericardial space. Indeed, dextrans of various MWs can be used to further dissect kidney function28.

    The zebrafish pronephric tubules are highly ciliated with motile cilia that facilitate the movement of filtrate toward the cloaca3,4. Defects in ciliary machinery have been implicated in kidney disease. BBS is a genetically heterogeneous, autosomal recessive disorder characterized by childhood-onset retinal degeneration, early onset obesity, cognitive impairment, polydactyly and renal malformation24. To date, 20 BBS genes (BBS1-20) have been identified. Disruption of bbs leads to renal cyst formation and defective pronephric function in zebrafish9. BBS9 interacts with other BBS proteins to form the BBSome responsible for appropriate ciliogenesis, mutations of which account for 6% of BBS cases24. Whilst a zebrafish bbs9 knockdown model has been reported, a description of the renal phenotype was lacking26. By knocking down bbs9 in zebrafish, using the morpholino approach, we demonstrate the use of the renal clearance assay as a method to determine kidney function in a kidney disease model. Here, we show that bbs9 morphant embryos display impeded fluorescent clearance from the blood stream, indicating that the kidney failed to remove low MW solutes. Thus, because of the involvement of bbs9 in ciliogenesis, and the role of pronephric cilia in facilitating filtrate movement, the observed kidney clearance in morphants is likely to be due to aberrant cilia function. This method represents a valuable tool for assessing kidney function in zebrafish disease models.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


    The authors have nothing to disclose.


    Technical assistance provided by Jaipreet Bharj. This work was supported by grants from EU-FP7 (SYSCILIA -241955) and The Dutch Kidney Foundation (CP11.18).


    Name Company Catalog Number Comments
    P-97 SUTTER Flaming/Brown type micropipette puller Intracel P-97
    borosilicate standard wall capillaries Harvard Apparatus 30-0017
    Glass microscope slides VWR International 631-0109
    Epoxy Resin Glue Evo-Stik
    Rhodamine B 10,000 MW labeled Dextran Life technologies  D-1824
    N-Phenylthiourea  Sigma-Aldrich  P7629
    Methylene blue  Sigma-Aldrich M9140
    Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt Sigma-Aldrich A5040
    methylcellulose Sigma-Aldrich M0512
    air compressor  Jun-Air OF302-15
    Picospritzer III  Parker Instruments  051-0500-900
    compact 3-axis control micromanipulator  Marzhauser MM33 
    Dissecting stereo microscope Nikon SMZ1000
    microloader tips Eppendorf 5242956003
    Dumont #5 forceps  Sigma-Aldrich F6521
    stage micrometer  Pyser- SGI 02A00404


    1. Hentschel, D. M., et al. Acute renal failure in zebrafish: a novel system to study a complex disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 288, (5), 923-929 (2005).
    2. Drummond, I. Making a zebrafish kidney: a tale of two tubes. Trends Cell Biol. 13, (7), 357-365 (2003).
    3. Ma, M., Jiang, Y. J. Jagged2a-notch signaling mediates cell fate choice in the zebrafish pronephric duct. PLoS Genet. 3, (1), e18 (2007).
    4. Liu, Y., Pathak, N., Kramer-Zucker, A., Drummond, I. A. Notch signaling controls the differentiation of transporting epithelia and multiciliated cells in the zebrafish pronephros. Development. 134, (6), 1111-1122 (2007).
    5. Drummond, I. A. Kidney development and disease in the zebrafish. J Am Soc Nephrol. 16, (2), 299-304 (2005).
    6. Cardenas-Rodriguez, M., et al. Characterization of CCDC28B reveals its role in ciliogenesis and provides insight to understand its modifier effect on Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Hum Genet. 132, (1), 91-105 (2013).
    7. Osborn, D. P., et al. Loss of FTO antagonises Wnt signaling and leads to developmental defects associated with ciliopathies. PLoS One. 9, (2), e87662 (2014).
    8. Pearson, C. G., Osborn, D. P., Giddings, T. H., Beales, P. L., Winey, M. Basal body stability and ciliogenesis requires the conserved component Poc1. J Cell Biol. 187, (6), 905-920 (2009).
    9. Tobin, J. L., Beales, P. L. Restoration of renal function in zebrafish models of ciliopathies. Pediatr Nephrol. 23, (11), 2095-2099 (2008).
    10. Torres, V. E., Harris, P. C. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the last 3 years. Kidney Int. 76, (2), 149-168 (2009).
    11. Bogdanova, N., Markoff, A., Horst, J. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease - clinical and genetic aspects. Kidney Blood Press Res. 25, (5), 265-283 (2002).
    12. Harris, P. C., Ward, C. J., Peral, B., Hughes, J. Polycystic kidney disease. 1: Identification and analysis of the primary defect. J Am Soc Nephrol. 6, (4), 1125-1133 (1995).
    13. Reynolds, D. M., et al. Aberrant splicing in the PKD2 gene as a cause of polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 10, (11), 2342-2351 (1999).
    14. Pazour, G. J., San Agustin, ajt, Follit, J. A., Rosenbaum, J. L., Witman, G. B. Polycystin-2 localizes to kidney cilia and the ciliary level is elevated in orpk mice with polycystic kidney disease. Curr Biol. 12, (11), R378-R380 (2002).
    15. Yoder, B. K., Hou, X., Guay-Woodford, L. M. The polycystic kidney disease proteins, polycystin-1, polycystin-2, polaris, and cystin, are co-localized in renal cilia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 13, (10), 2508-2516 (2002).
    16. Baker, K., Beales, P. L. Making sense of cilia in disease: the human ciliopathies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 151C, (4), 281-295 (2009).
    17. Veland, I. R., Awan, A., Pedersen, L. B., Yoder, B. K., Christensen, S. T. Primary cilia and signaling pathways in mammalian development, health and disease. Nephron Physiol. 111, (3), 39-53 (2009).
    18. Hruscha, A., et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development. 140, (24), 4982-4987 (2013).
    19. Bedell, V. M., et al. In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. 491, (7422), 114-118 (2012).
    20. Eisen, J. S., Smith, J. C. Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense. Development. 135, (10), 1735-1743 (2008).
    21. Gerlach, G. F., Wingert, R. A. Kidney organogenesis in the zebrafish: insights into vertebrate nephrogenesis and regeneration. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2, (5), 559-585 (2013).
    22. Wingert, R. A., et al. The cdx genes and retinoic acid control the positioning and segmentation of the zebrafish pronephros. PLoS Genet. 3, (10), 1922-1938 (2007).
    23. Westerfield, M. The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio Rerio). 4th, Univ. of Oregon Press. Eugene. (2000).
    24. Forsythe, E., Beales, P. L. Bardet-Biedl syndrome). Eur J Hum Genet. 21, (1), 8-13 (2013).
    25. Corbetta, S., et al. High prevalence of simple kidney cysts in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest. 32, (8), 690-694 (2009).
    26. Veleri, S., et al. Knockdown of Bardet-Biedl syndrome gene BBS9/PTHB1 leads to cilia defects. PLoS One. 7, (3), e34389 (2012).
    27. Vize, P., Woolf, A. S., Bard, J. The Kidney: From Normal Development to Congenital Disease. Academic Press. (2003).
    28. Chang, R. L., et al. Permselectivity of the glomerular capillary wall to macromolecules. II. Experimental studies in rats using neutral dextran. Biophys J. 15, (9), 887-906 (1975).



    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.


    simple hit counter