The nervous system of Hydra consists of a nerve net, with neurons associated with both epithelial tissue layers1. The nerve net is denser in the hypostome and peduncle and less dense in the body column2. The nerve cells originate from interstitial stem cells, which are multipotent stem cells that give rise to secretory cells, nematocytes, germ cells, and neurons1. It is possible to eliminate the interstitial cells of Hydra vulgaris through treatment with colchicine3,4, a plant-derived toxin that kills dividing cells. Although colchicine has been found to inhibit microtubule polymerization in other organisms, a previous study has shown that microtubules are present in Hydra throughout the entire treatment, suggesting that colchicine does not act this way in Hydra3. Another study suggests that colchicine does not bind efficiently to tubulin in some organisms, including Tetrahymena pyriformis, Zea mays, Chlamydomonas, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which may explain this difference5. The colchicine treatment induces phagocytosis of the interstitial cells by the endodermal epithelial cells3 and thus allows for the creation of animals that are lacking nerve cells, gland cells, and nematocytes. It is unclear why the interstitial cells are particularly susceptible to colchicine treatment. Given that both post-mitotic interstitial cells and the interstitial stem cell lineage are damaged and phagocytosed, Campbell concluded that colchicine was not directly affecting mitotic activity3. Notably, the colchicine treatment works well in Hydra vulgaris, but has been shown to not work as well in other species, such as Hydra oligactis6. A modified treatment with colchicine and hydroxyurea can be used to produce nerve-free Hydra viridis7. Nerve-free Hydra (also sometimes referred to as "epithelial Hydra"8) are therefore a useful tool for studying the roles of these specialized cell types from the interstitial cell lineage in tissue homeostasis and regeneration.
Hydra may be the only known example of an animal capable of living without a nervous system. Nerve-free Hydra serve as a particularly useful model for dissecting the role of the nerve net in regulating Hydra regeneration, homeostasis, and behavior. For example, the introduction of interstitial cells into nerve-free Hydra via grafting allowed for the characterization of nerve cell differentiation as highly region-specific9. Furthermore, because nerve-free Hydra can regenerate, they enable the investigation of alternative, nervous system-independent regeneration pathways. One such example is apical neurogenesis and head formation, which has been shown to depend on cnox-2 function in the nervous system in wildtype Hydra, but appears to be dispensable in nerve-free Hydra, suggesting that there may be an alternative head regeneration process10.
Nerve-free Hydra have also been used to study epithelial cell expression and regulation of neurogenic and neurotransmission genes after the loss of neurogenesis11. Nerve-free Hydra do not exhibit spontaneous contraction bursts12, indicating that these bursts are regulated by the nervous system. Nerve-free Hydra do, however, contract in response to pinching the body column with forceps, suggesting that contraction in response to mechanical stimuli is mediated by coupling through gap junctions in epithelial cells, while spontaneous contractile behavior is mediated by coupling through gap junctions in nerve cells13.
Nerve-free Hydra do not open their mouths when presented with food or reduced glutathione3, suggesting that sensory neurons are necessary to detect the presence of food and signal the mouth to open. In addition, the nerve net seems to play a role in sensing osmotic pressure, because nerve-free animals are unable to autonomously regulate their internal hydrostatic pressure through mouth opening, causing their characteristic balloon-like appearance3,4 (Figure 1B). Regulation of hydrostatic pressure in nerve-free Hydra by frequent manual deflation led to a loss of some abnormal morphology in the hypostome and body column. However, chronic deflation led to interference with growth, elongation, budding, and tissue organization8.
Although nerve-free Hydra are unable to feed and egest on their own, it is possible to maintain them indefinitely in the laboratory by manually force-feeding and burping each animal. Previous publications have described methods of force-feeding and burping nerve-free Hydra, however these protocols involved the use of micropipette tips that must be hand pulled carefully to the appropriate size as well as use of a mouthpiece connected to the pipette by tubing14. Here, a simpler, safer, and more time-efficient method of feeding and burping is described.
In addition, previous studies involved checking for the absence of nerve cells through dissociation of fixed animals into individual cells and examination of cell morphology3,4,15. Here, immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody against the tyrosinated carboxyl-terminus of alpha-tubulin was used as a complimentary method to maceration to check for the depletion of neurons in the hypostome13,16. Previous studies have shown that neurons in the peduncle can also be visualized using this antibody13, however these neurons as well as those in the body column are more difficult to make out. While immunohistochemistry is sufficient to confirm the absence of nerve cells in the hypostome and does not require expertise on cell type morphology, it cannot be used to check for the absence of the interstitial stem cells and the other derivatives of these cells. Dissociation and cell morphology studies are more rigorous and can give a quantitative account of the numbers of each cell type remaining following each stage of the treatment.