Digesting chromatin is one of the important steps for a ChIP assay. We used MNase to digest chromatin to obtain a mixture of nucleosome oligomers. In the MNase digestion step, MNase can go through the nuclear membrane and digest chromatin. However, the digested chromatin cannot go through the membrane and remains in the nuclei. To release the digested chromatin from the nuclei, brief sonication is needed. Figure 1A shows microphotographs before and after sonication of VCaP cell suspension. Without sonication, the cell structure remains intact, indicating that the chromatin is present in the nuclei. A brief sonication breaks the cell structure, and checking the cells in microphotographs helps to determine the brief sonication conditions. We also represented other examples for brief sonication in 293T cells (Figure 1B) the human B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, REH cells (Figure 1C) and the human prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP (Figure 1D).
Figure 2A shows chromatin fragmentation after treatment with different amounts of MNase in VCaP cells. We treated 6 x 106 crosslinked VCaP cell pellets with 0, 50, 100, 200 gel units of MNase in 300 µL of digestion buffer for 10 min at 37 °C. After purification of the digested chromatin, 500 ng of DNA was analyzed on 2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Without adding MNase, a smear pattern with a very high molecular weight appeared (lane 1). The addition of MNase gave a ladder pattern (N; a mononucleosome unit), showing that MNase digests internucleosome (lanes 2-5). Figure 2B shows an inappropriate digestion pattern. Overdigestion mainly resulted in mononucleosome production (Figure 2B, lane 7). We should find the proper conditions that produce chromatin fragments up to 900 bp (one to five nucleosomes; e.g., lane 5).
To check whether the ChIP assay is performed properly, it is essential to have appropriate controls in the assay. For immunoprecipitation, nonimmune IgGs from the same species as the antibodies of interest are used as a control that shows nonspecific binding to the same region (see discussion). In addition, it is recommended to measure the binding of the proteins (occupancy) in both positive and negative regions. It has been widely accepted that H3K4me3 occupancy is distributed between approximately one kilobase (kb) upstream and downstream of transcription start sites10,11. We measured H3K4me3 occupancy in the AR genome spanning approximately 20 kb upstream through 12 kb downstream of the AR transcription start site (AR-TSS) in AR-positive VCaP cells. Digestion pattern of chromatin in VCaP cells used in this experiment was shown in Figure 3A, indicating the proper digestion of chromatin. The highest occupancy of H3K4me3 was observed around the AR-TSS and 0.5 kb and 1 kb upstream of the AR-TSS (Figure 3B). As long as genes are transcriptionally active, TSSs can be “positive regions”. Regions located at 19 kb and 8 kb upstream and 12 kb downstream of AR-TSS, however, had little occupancy of H3K4me3 (Figure 3B), indicating that these can be used as “negative regions”.
It has been shown that an androgen increases RNA polymerase II occupancy in the PSA promoter and enhancer in LNCaP cells using sheared chromatin by sonication12,13. We therefore tested the validity of our protocol by measuring active RNA polymerase II occupancy (phosphorylated RNA polymerase II at serine 5; PolII(pS5)) in the cells. We performed the same experiment to check the reproducibility of our method. LNCaP cells were cultured in steroid-starved medium for 3 days and stimulated with a vehicle or 10 nM dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for 4 h. Active RNA polymerase II occupancy was measured by immunoprecipitation with anti-PolII(pS5), followed by real-time PCR. Figure 4A shows a reproducible digestion pattern of chromatin from LNCaP cells in three independent experiments. As shown in Figure 4B, DHT significantly increased PolII(pS5) occupancy in the PSA promoter and enhancer when using percent input method. We also calculated the occupancy using fold enrichment method (Figure 4C) and found that no significant difference in PolII(pS5) in the PSA promoter was observed with or without DHT treatment. DHT did not affect occupancy in the GAPDH promoter as previously published14. Importantly, our data were similar to that obtained from sonication-sheared chromatin samples12,13.

Figure 1: Representative microphotographs of crosslinked cell pellets before and after sonication. Crosslinked VCaP (A), 293T (B), REH (C) and LNCaP (D) cell pellets were treated with MNase, and pellets were resuspended in ChIP dilution buffer. Before and after sonication, pictures of the suspensions were taken. Scale bar = 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Representative agarose gel analysis of digested chromatin. (A) Crosslinked chromatin was prepared from VCaP cells and digested with various amounts of MNase as described in step 2.2. Digested chromatin was reverse crosslinked, purified, and analyzed in a 2% agarose gel. N; a mononucleosome unit. (B) Chromatin of VCaP cells was digested with 250 gel units of MNase per 2 x 106 cells at 37 °C for 20 min and analyzed (as described in A). Larger amounts of MNase and longer incubation times caused almost complete digestion of chromatin to form mononucleosomes (150 bp). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: H3K4me3 occupancy in the AR genome. Digested chromatin was prepared from VCaP cells. (A) Digestion pattern was analyzed using an agarose gel. (B) 5 µg of digested chromatin was immunoprecipitated with 2 µg of either normal rabbit IgG or anti-H3K4me3 antibody as mentioned in step 3.1 and step 3.2. Immune complexes were washed and eluted from beads, and reverse crosslinked. Purified DNA fragments were analyzed using real-time PCR with the primer sets listed in Table 2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Androgen increased active RNA polymerase II occupancy in the PSA promoter and enhancer. Steroid-starved LNCaP cells were treated with or without 10 nM DHT for 4 h, and digested chromatin was prepared. (A) Digestion pattern of chromatin from LNCaP cells in three independent experiments. (B,C) Digested chromatin was immunoprecipitated with an anti-PolII(pS5) antibody, and DNA fragments were purified as described for Figure 3. The occupancy of active RNA polymerase II in the PSA promoter, enhancer, and GAPDH promoter as a percent input (B) and fold enrichment (C) was determined using real-time PCR with the primer sets listed in Table 2. The results shown are mean ± SE of three independent experiments. (*); p<0.05, (**); p < 0.01 versus 0 nM DHT treatment. NS; not significant versus 0 nM DHT. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Cell line | gel units per two million cells in 100 µL of buffer, 37 °C for 10 min |
| LNCaP | 267 |
| VCaP | 66.7 |
| 293T | 450 |
| REH | 134 |
| 22Rv1 | 400 |
Table 1: Optimum amount of micrococcal nuclease in various cell lines. The value represents the amounts of MNase per 2 x 106 cells in 100 µL of buffer, 37 °C for 10 min.
| Primer name | | Sequence |
| AR (-18.8kb) | FWD | ATTTGGAACTGGGAACATCT |
| REV | CACCTTCTCTCCTCCACTCT |
| AR (-8.8kb) | FWD | TAACAGCTTTGCATCCAAGT |
| REV | TGAAATCTGGGACTAAAGCA |
| AR (-8.2kb) | FWD | CAGTGCTATTCCCTTGTGAC |
| REV | TTGGACTGGCTCTATCTTGA |
| AR-TSS (0 kb) | FWD | GCAAACTGTTGCATTTGCTC |
| REV | GGCCCTTTTTCCCTCTGTC |
| AR (0.6 kb) | FWD | CACGACCCGCCTGGTTAG |
| REV | TGAAGACCTGACTGCCTTTTC |
| AR (+1.0kb) | FWD | CCGCAAGTTTCCTTCTCTGG |
| REV | CTTCCCAGCCCTAACTGCAC |
| AR (+11.8kb) | FWD | CCTTGCTTGTGGAACTGTAG |
| REV | TTTATTGTCTGGTGCTAGGC |
| PSA promoter | FWD | CCTAGATGAAGTCTCCATGAGCTACA |
| REV | GGGAGGGAGAGCTAGCACTTG |
| PSA enhancer | FWD | GCCTGGATCTGAGAGAGATATCATC |
| REV | ACACCTTTTTTTTTCTGGATTGTTG |
| GAPDH | FWD | TACTAGCGGTTTTACGGGCG |
| REV | TCGAACAGGAGGAGCAGAGAGCGA |
Table 2: Paired Primer sequences used for ChIP assay.
| AR (-18.8kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 23.49 | 0.815 | 81.5 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 27.68 | 0.051 | 0.051 | 0.062 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 22.48 | 1.590 | 1.590 | 1.951 | 31.4 |
| AR (-8.8kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 23.22 | 0.586 | 58.6 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 26.81 | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.088 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 23.74 | 0.414 | 0.414 | 0.706 | 8.0 |
| AR (-8.2kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 23.19 | 0.643 | 64.3 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 26.99 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.075 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 23.63 | 0.477 | 0.477 | 0.742 | 9.9 |
| AR-TSS (0 kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 25.06 | 0.657 | 65.7 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 28.63 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.077 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 20.70 | 15.064 | 15.064 | 22.944 | 299.8 |
| AR (0.6 kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 23.86 | 0.716 | 71.6 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 26.67 | 0.106 | 0.106 | 0.147 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 19.15 | 17.787 | 17.787 | 24.840 | 168.6 |
| AR (+1.0kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 23.51 | 0.730 | 73.0 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 25.94 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.171 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 19.06 | 18.486 | 18.486 | 25.335 | 147.8 |
| AR (+11.8kb) | Cq | SQ | Adjusted to one IP | % Input | Fold enrichment |
| 1% Input | 24.54 | 0.876 | 87.6 | 100 | |
| IP with Control IgG | 29.14 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.037 | 1 |
| IP with anti-H3K4me3 | 24.47 | 0.918 | 0.918 | 1.048 | 27.97 |
Table 3: Raw data from quantitative PCR analysis for Figure 3. Cq: Threshold cycle number, SQ: starting quantity calculated using a standard curve, Adjusted to one IP: multiply SQ in 1% input by 100 as 1% sample volume of one IP is used for PCR, % Input: divide SQ in IP sample by adjusted SQ in Input, Fold enrichment: divide SQ in IP with anti-H3K4me3 by SQ in IP with control IgG.