$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDV) are extremely diverse, defined by four families that infect eukaryotes1. The first described viruses with genomes above 300 kbp were Phydcodnaviridae, including Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus 1 PBCV12. The isolation and the first description of Mimivirus, showed that the size of viruses doubled in terms of both the size of the particle (450 nm) and the length of the genome (1.2 Mb)3. Since then, many giant viruses have been described, usually isolated using an amoeba co-culture procedure. Several giant viruses with different morphologies and genetic contents can be isolated from Acanthamoeba sp. cells, including Marseilleviruses, Pandoraviruses, Pithoviruses, Mollivirus, Cedratviruses, Pacmanvirus, Tupanvirus, and recently Medusavirus4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. In parallel, the isolation of Vermamoeba vermiformis allowed the isolation and description of the giant viruses Faustovirus, Kaumoebavirus, and Orpheovirus18,19,20. Other giant viruses were isolated with their host protists, such as Cafeteria roenbergensis21, Aureococcus anophagefferens22, Chrysochromulina ericina23, and Bodo saltans24. All of these isolations were the result of an increasing number of teams working on isolation and the introduction of high throughput strategy updates25,26,27,28, such as the improvement of the co-culture system with the use of flow cytometry.
In 2016, we used a strategy associating co-culture and flow cytometry to isolate giant viruses27. This strategy was developed to increase the number of samples inoculated, to diversify protists used as cell supports, and to quickly detect the lysis of the cell support. The system was updated by adding a supplemental step to avoid preliminary molecular biology identification and quick detection of an unknown viral population as in the case of Pacmanvirus29. Coupling flow cytometry to cell sorting allowed for separation of a mixture of Mimivirus and Cedratvirus A1130. However, we later encountered the limitations of the separation and detection of these viral subpopulations by flow cytometry. After sequencing, when we assembled the genomes of Faustovirus ST125 and Faustovirus LCD7 (unpublished data), we surprisingly found in each assembly two supplemental genomes of two novel viruses not identified in public genome databases. However, neither flow cytometry nor transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) showed that the amoebaes were infected by two different viruses, Clandestinovirus ST1 and Usurpativirus LCD7. We designed specific PCR systems to amplify Faustovirus, Usurpativirus, and Clandestinovirus markers respectively based on their genomes; our purpose was to have PCR-based systems that enable verification of the purity of the viruses being separated. However, end-point dilution and flow cytometry failed to separate them. The isolation of this single viral population was difficult because neither the morphology nor replicative elements of Clandestinovirus and Usurpativirus populations have been characterized. We detected only one viral population by flow cytometry due to the overlapping of the two populations (tested after the effective separation). We tried to separate them using single particle sorting on 96-well plates, but we did not observe any cytopathic effects, and we detected neither Clandestinovirus nor Usurpativirus by PCR amplification. Finally, it was only the combination of end point dilution followed by single amoeba micro-aspiration that enabled separation of these two low-abundance giant viruses from Faustoviruses. This method of separation is the object of this article.