The pulmonary route of administration offers various benefits in delivering therapeutics for both local and systemic actions. For the treatment of lung diseases, high local drug concentration can be achieved by pulmonary delivery, thereby reducing the required dose and lowering the incidence of systemic side effects. Moreover, the relatively low enzymatic activities in the lung can reduce premature drug metabolism. The lungs are also efficient for drug absorption for systemic action due to the large and well-perfused surface area, the extremely thin epithelial cell layer and the high blood volume in pulmonary capillaries1.
Inhaled dry powder formulations have been widely investigated for the prevention and treatment of various diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and pulmonary vaccination2,3,4. Drugs in the solid state are generally more stable than in the liquid form, and dry powder inhalers are more portable and user-friendly than nebulizers5,6. In the development of inhaled dry powder formulations, the safety, the pharmacokinetic profile and the therapeutic efficacy need to be evaluated in preclinical animal models following pulmonary administration7. Unlike humans who can inhale dry powder actively, pulmonary delivery of dry powder to small animals is challenging. It is necessary to establish an efficient protocol of delivering dry powder to the lungs of animals.
Mice are widely used as research animal models because they are economical and they breed well. They are also easy to handle and many disease models are well-established. There are two major approaches to administer dry powder to the lung of mouse: inhalation and intratracheal administration. For inhalation, the mouse is placed in a whole-body or nose-only chamber where dry powder is aerosolized and the animals breathe in the aerosol without sedation8,9. Expensive equipment is required and the drug delivery efficiency is low. While the whole-body chamber may be technically less challenging, the nose-only exposure chamber could minimize exposure of drugs to the body surface. Regardless, it is still difficult to precisely control and determine the dose delivered to the lungs. The dry powder is mainly deposited in the nasopharynx region where mucociliary clearance is prominent10. Moreover, mice inside the chamber are under significant stress during the administration process because they are constrained and deprived of food and water supply11. For intratracheal administration, it generally refers to the introduction of the substance directly into the trachea. There are two different techniques to achieve this: tracheotomy and orotracheal intubation. The former requires a surgical procedure that makes an incision in the trachea, which is invasive and seldom used for powder administration. Only the second technique is described here. Compared to the inhalation method, intratracheal administration is the more commonly used method for pulmonary delivery in the mouse because of its high delivery efficiency with minimal drug loss12,13. It is a simple and fast method to precisely deliver a small amount of powder within a few milligrams to the mouse. Although the mouse is anatomically and physiologically distinct to humans and anesthetization is required during the intubation process, intratracheal administration bypasses the upper respiratory tract and offers a more effective way to assess the biological activities of the dry powder formulation such as the pulmonary absorption, bioavailability and therapeutic effects14,15.
To administer dry powder intratracheally, the mouse has to be intubated, which could be challenging. In this paper, the fabrication of a custom-made dry powder insufflator and an intubation device is described. The procedures of intubation and insufflation of dry powder in the lung of the mouse are demonstrated.