A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

In-Nucleus Hi-C in Drosophila Cells

4.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/62106

⸱

September 15th, 2021

 ,  ,  , 
1Departamento de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

In This Article

Summary

The genome is organized in the nuclear space into different structures that can be revealed through chromosome conformation capture technologies. The in-nucleus Hi-C method provides a genome-wide collection of chromatin interactions in Drosophila cell lines, which generates contact maps that can be explored at megabase resolution at restriction fragment level.

Abstract

The genome is organized into topologically associating domains (TADs) delimited by boundaries that isolate interactions between domains. In Drosophila, the mechanisms underlying TAD formation and boundaries are still under investigation. The application of the in-nucleus Hi-C method described here helped to dissect the function of architectural protein (AP)-binding sites at TAD boundaries isolating the Notch gene. Genetic modification of domain boundaries that cause loss of APs results in TAD fusion, transcriptional defects, and long-range topological alterations. These results provided evidence demonstrating the contribution of genetic elements to domain boundary formation and gene expression control in Drosophila. Here, the in-nucleus Hi-C method has been described in detail, which provides important checkpoints to assess the quality of the experiment along with the protocol. Also shown are the required numbers of sequencing reads and valid Hi-C pairs to analyze genomic interactions at different genomic scales. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic editing of regulatory elements and high-resolution profiling of genomic interactions using this in-nucleus Hi-C protocol could be a powerful combination for the investigation of the structural function of genetic elements.

Introduction

In eukaryotes, the genome is partitioned into chromosomes that occupy specific territories in the nuclear space during interphase1. The chromatin forming the chromosomes can be divided into two main states: one of accessible chromatin that is transcriptionally permissive, and the other of compact chromatin that is transcriptionally repressive. These chromatin states segregate and rarely mix in the nuclear space, forming two distinct compartments in the nucleus2. At the sub-megabase scale, boundaries separate domains of high-frequency chromatin interactions, called TADs, that mark chromosomal organization3,4,5. In mammals, TAD boundaries are occupied by cohesin and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)6,7,8. The cohesin complex extrudes chromatin and halts at CTCF-binding sites that are disposed in a convergent orientation in the genomic sequence to form stable chromatin loops9,10,13,14. Genetic disruption of the CTCF DNA-binding site at the boundaries or reduction in CTCF and cohesin protein abundance results in abnormal interactions between regulatory elements, loss of TAD formation, and gene expression deregulation9,10,11,13,14.

In Drosophila, the boundaries between TADs are occupied by several APs, including boundary element-associated factor 32 kDa (BEAF-32), Motif 1 binding protein (M1BP), centrosomal protein 190 (CP190), suppressor of hairy-wing (SuHW), and CTCF, and are enriched in active histone modifications and Polymerase II16,17,18. It has been suggested that in Drosophila, TADs appear as a consequence of transcription13,17,19, and the exact role of independent APs in boundary formation and insulation properties is still under investigation. Thus, whether domains in Drosophila are a sole consequence of the aggregation of regions of similar transcriptional states or whether APs, including CTCF, contribute to boundary formation remains to be fully characterized. Exploration of genomic contacts at high resolution has been possible through the development of chromosome conformation capture technologies coupled with next-generation sequencing. The Hi-C protocol was first described with the ligation step performed "in solution"2 in an attempt to avoid spurious ligation products between chromatin fragments. However, several studies pointed to the realization that the useful signal in the data came from ligation products formed at partially lysed nuclei that were not in solution20,21.

The protocol was then modified to perform the ligation inside the nucleus as part of the single-cell Hi-C experiment22. The in-nucleus Hi-C protocol was subsequently incorporated into cell population Hi-C to yield a more consistent coverage over the full range of genomic distances and produce data with less technical noise23,24. The protocol, described in detail here, is based on the population in-nucleus Hi-C protocol23,24 and was used to investigate the consequences of genetically removing DNA-binding motifs for CTCF and M1BP from a domain boundary at the Notch gene locus in Drosophila25. The results show that altering the DNA-binding motifs for APs at the boundary has drastic consequences for Notch domain formation, larger topological defects in the regions surrounding the Notch locus, and gene expression deregulation. This indicates that genetic elements at domain boundaries are important for the maintenance of genome topology and gene expression in Drosophila25.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Fixation

  1. Start with 10 million Schneider's line 2 plus (S2R+) cells to prepare 17.5 mL of a cell suspension in Schneider medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at room temperature (RT).
  2. Add methanol-free formaldehyde to obtain a final concentration of 2%. Mix and incubate for 10 min at RT, taking care to mix every minute.
    NOTE: Formaldehyde is a hazardous chemical. Follow the appropriate health and safety regulations, and work in the fume hood.
  3. Quench the reaction by adding glycine to achieve a final concentration of 0.125 M and mix. Incubate for 5 min at RT, followed by 15 min on ice.
  4. Centrifuge for 400 × g at RT for 5 min and then for 10 min at 4 °C; discard the supernatant. Resuspend the pellet carefully in 25 mL of cold 1x phosphate-buffered saline.
  5. Centrifuge at 400 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, then discard the supernatant.
    NOTE: If continuing with the protocol, go to step 2.1 for lysis; otherwise, flash-freeze the pellet in liquid N2 and store the pellet at -80 °C.

2. Lysis

  1. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 0.2% of non-ionic surfactant (see the Table of Materials); 10 mM NaCl; 1x protease inhibitors), and adjust the volume to 10 mL with ice-cold lysis buffer. Adjust the volume to obtain a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Incubate on ice for 30 min, mixing every 2 min by inverting the tubes.
  2. Centrifuge the nuclei at 300 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and then carefully discard the supernatant. Wash the pellet 1x with 1 mL of cold lysis buffer, and transfer it to a microcentrifuge tube. Wash the pellet 1x with 1 mL of cold 1.25x restriction buffer, and resuspend each cell pellet in 360 µL of 1.25x restriction buffer.
  3. Add 11 µL of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) per tube (0.3% final concentration), mix carefully by pipetting, and incubate at 37 °C for 45 min, shaking at 700-950 rpm. Pipet up and down to disrupt clumps a few times during incubation.
  4. Quench the SDS by adding 75 µL of non-ionic surfactant (10% solution, see the Table of Materials) per tube (1.6% final concentration), and incubate at 37 °C for 45 min, shaking at 950 rpm. Pipet up and down a few times to disrupt clumps during incubation.
    NOTE: If clumps are large and difficult to disrupt, decrease the rotating speed to 400 rpm during SDS and surfactant treatments. If the clumps are difficult to disaggregate by pipetting, split the sample into two; adjust the volumes of restriction buffer, SDS, and surfactant; and proceed with the permeabilization. Next, spin the nuclei at minimum speed (200 × g), carefully discard the supernatant, pool the samples together in 1X restriction buffer, and proceed with digestion. Take a 10 µL aliquot as the undigested sample (UD).

3. Enzymatic digestion

  1. Digest the chromatin by adding 200 units (U) of Mbo I per tube, and incubate at 37 °C for a period ranging from 4 h to overnight while rotating (950 rpm).
  2. On the next day, add an additional 50 U of Mbo I per tube, and incubate at 37 °C for 2 h while rotating (950 rpm).
  3. Inactivate the enzyme by incubating the tubes at 60 °C for 20 min. Place the tubes on ice.
    NOTE: Take a 10 µL aliquot as the digested sample (D).

4. Biotinylation of DNA ends

  1. To fill in the restriction fragment overhangs and label the DNA ends with biotin, add 1.5 µL each of 10 mM dCTP, dGTP, dTTP, 20 µL of 0.4 mM biotin dATP, 17.5 µL of Tris low-EDTA (TLE) buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0], and 10 µL of 5 U/µL of Klenow (DNA polymerase I large fragment) to all the tubes. Mix carefully and incubate for 75 min at 37 °C. Shake at 700 rpm every 10 s for 30 s. Place all the tubes on ice while preparing the ligation mix.

5. Ligation

  1. Transfer each digested chromatin mixture to a separate 1 mL tube with ligation mix (100 µL of 10x ligation buffer, 10 µL of 10 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 15 U of T4 DNA ligase, and 425 µL of double-distilled water [ddH2O]). Mix thoroughly by gentle pipetting, and incubate overnight at 16 °C.

6. Crosslink reversal and DNA purification

  1. Degrade proteins by adding 50 µL of 10 mg/mL Proteinase K per tube, and incubate at 37 °C for 2 h. Reverse crosslinks by increasing the temperature to 65 °C and incubate overnight.
  2. Degrade RNA by adding 20 µL of 10 mg/mL RNase A, and incubate at 37 °C for 1 h.
  3. Perform phenol:chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation.
    1. Add 1 volume of phenol-chloroform, and mix thoroughly by inversion to obtain a homogeneous white phase.
      NOTE: Phenol is a hazardous chemical. Follow the appropriate health and safety regulations. Work in the fume hood.
    2. Centrifuge at 15,000 × g for 15 min. Transfer the aqueous phase into a fresh 2 mL microcentrifuge tube. Perform a back-extraction of the lower layer with 100 µL of TLE buffer, and transfer the aqueous phase into the same 2 mL tube.
    3. Precipitate DNA by adding 2 volumes of 100% ethyl alcohol (EtOH), 0.1 volumes of 3 M sodium acetate, and 2 µL of 20 mg/mL glycogen. Incubate at -20 °C for a period ranging from 2 h to overnight.
    4. Spin at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and wash the pellets 2x with ice-cold 70% EtOH. Dry the pellets at RT, and resuspend in 100 µL of TLE buffer. Quantify the DNA using a fluorogenic dye that binds selectively to DNA and a fluorometer according to the manufacturer's instructions (Table of Materials).
      NOTE: The protocol can be paused here. Store ligation products at 4 °C for the short term or at -20 °C for the long term. Use an aliquot (100 ng) of the material as the ligated sample (L) for quality control.

7. Assess Hi-C template quality

  1. Digestion and ligation qualitative controls
    1. Purify DNA from the UD and D aliquots by reversing the crosslinks, and perform phenol:chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation as described above.
    2. Load 100 ng of UD, D, and L samples in a 1.5% agarose gel. Look for a smear centered around 500 bp in the D sample versus a high molecular weight band for the L sample (see representative results).
  2. Digestion efficiency quantitative control
    NOTE: To assess the digestion efficiency more accurately, use the UD and D samples as templates to perform quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR) using primers designed as follows.
    1. Design a primer pair that amplifies a DNA fragment containing the DNA restriction site for the enzyme used for digestion (Mbo I in the present protocol), called R in the formula in step 7.2.3.
    2. Design a primer pair that amplifies a control DNA fragment that does not contain the restriction site for the enzyme used for digestion (Mbo I for the present protocol), called C in the formula in step 7.2.3.
    3. Use the cycle threshold values (Ct values) of the amplification to calculate restriction efficiency according to the formula shown below:
      % Restriction = 100 - 100/2{(CtR - CtC)D - (CtR - CtC)UD}
      Where CtR refers to the Ct value of fragment R, and CtC refers to the Ct value of the fragment C for sample D and sample UD.
      NOTE: The restriction percentage reflects the efficiency of the restriction enzyme cleaving the restricted (R) DNA fragment compared to a control (C) DNA fragment that does not contain the restriction DNA site. A restriction efficiency of ≥ 80% is recommended.
  3. Detection of known interactions
    1. Perform PCR to amplify an internal ligation control to examine short-range and/or medium- or long-range interactions (see representative results).
    2. Alternatively, design primers to amplify a ligation product in which the primers are in forward-forward or reverse-reverse orientation in adjacent restriction fragments.
  4. Fill-in and biotin-labeling control
    1. Verify Hi-C marking and ligation efficiency by amplification and digestion of a known interaction or a ligation product between adjacent restriction fragments in the genome, as described above.
      NOTE: Successful fill-in and ligation of the Mbo I site (GATC) generates a new site for the restriction enzyme Cla I (ATCGAT) at the ligation junction and regenerates the Mbo I site.
    2. Digest the PCR product with Mbo I, Cla I, or both. After running the samples on a 1.5-2% gel, estimate the relative number of 3C and Hi-C ligation junctions by quantifying the intensity of the cut and uncut bands26.
      NOTE: An efficiency of > 70% is desired (see representative results).

8. Sonication

  1. Sonicate the samples to obtain 200-500 bp DNA fragments. For the instrument used in this protocol (see the Table of Materials), dilute the sample (from 5 to 10 µg) in 130 µL of ddH2O per tube, and set the instrument to sonicate to 400 bp: fill level: 10; duty factor: 10%; peak incident power (w): 140; cycles per burst: 200; time (s): 80.

9. Biotin removal/end repair

NOTE: The steps shown below are adjusted for 5 µg of Hi-C DNA.

  1. To perform biotin removal, transfer the sample (130 µL) into a fresh microcentrifuge tube. Add 16 µL of 10x ligation buffer, 2 µL of 10 mM dATP, 5 µL of T4 DNA Polymerase (15U), and 7 µL of ddH2O (160 µL of total volume). Incubate at 20 °C for 30 min.
  2. Add 5 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 4 µL of 10x ligation buffer, 5 µL of T4 polynucleotide kinase (10 U/µL), 1 µL of Klenow, and 25 µL of ddH2O (200 µL of total volume). Incubate at 20 °C for 30 min.

10. Size selection

  1. To select fragments mostly in the 250-550 bp size range, perform sequential solid phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) size selection first with 0.6x, followed by 0.90x according to the manufacturer's instructions, and elute the DNA using 100 µL of TLE.

11. Biotin pulldown/A-tailing/adapter ligation

NOTE: Perform the washes by resuspending the magnetic beads by vortexing, rotate the samples for 3 min on a rotating wheel, and then briefly spin down the sample and place it on the magnetic stand. Allow the beads to stick to the magnet, discard the supernatant, and proceed with the following wash step. Perform the washes at 55 °C on a thermo-block with rotation instead of the rotating wheel.

  1. Make up the final volume to 300 µL per sample with TLE for pull-down. Prepare the bead-washing buffers: 1x Tween Buffer (TB) (TB: 5 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween), 0.5x TB, 1x No-Tween buffer (NTB) (5 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl), 2x NTB.
  2. Use 150 µL of streptavidin-linked magnetic beads (see the Table of Materials) per library. Wash the beads 2x with 400 µL of 1x TB. Then resuspend beads in 300 µL 2x NTB.
  3. Mix the beads with the 300 µL Hi-C material and incubate at RT for 30 minutes on a rotating wheel to allow biotin binding to streptavidin beads.
  4. Wash the beads with 400 µL of 0.5x TB, and incubate at 55 °C for 3 min, rotating at 750 rpm. Wash the beads in 200 µL of 1x restriction buffer.
  5. Resuspend the beads in 100 µL of dATP tailing mix (5 µL of 10 mM dATP, 10 µL of 10x restriction buffer, 5 µL of Klenow exo-, and 80 µL of ddH2O). Incubate at 37 °C for 30 min.
  6. Remove the supernatant, wash the beads 2x with 400 µL of 0.5x TB by incubating at 55 °C for 3 min and rotating at 750 rpm.
  7. Wash the beads with 400 µL of 1x NTB and then with 100 µL of 1x ligation buffer.
  8. Resuspend the beads in 50 µL of 1x ligation buffer, and transfer the suspension to a new tube. Add 4 µL of pre-annealed PE adapters (15 µM stock) and 2 µL of T4 ligase (400 U/µL, i.e., 800 U/tube); incubate at RT for 2 h.
    NOTE: Pre-anneal the adapters by adding equal volumes of both PE 1.0 and PE 2.0 adapters (30 µM stock) and incubating for 10 min at RT (see the Table of Materials).
  9. Recapture the beads by removing the supernatant and washing the beads 2x with 400 µL of TB. Wash the beads with 200 µL of 1x NTB, then with 100 µL of 1x restriction buffer, and resuspend the beads in 40 µL of 1x restriction buffer.

12. PCR amplification

  1. Set up PCRs of 25 µL volume with 5, 6, 7, and 8 cycles. For each PCR, use:
    Reaction Recipe
    Hi-C beads2.5 µL
    10 µM PE PCR primer 1 (Table of Materials)0.75 µL
    10 µM PE PCR primer 2 (Table of Materials)0.75 µL
    10 mM dNTP0.6 µL
    5x reaction buffer5 µL
    DNA polymerase0.3 µL
    ddH2O14.65 µL
    Total25 µL
    CyclesTemperatureTime
    198 °C30 s
    n cycles98 °C10 s
    65 °C30 s
    72 °C30 s
    172 °C7 min

13. Final PCR amplification

  1. Perform final PCR amplification using the same conditions as described above and the number of cycles selected. Split the sample using 5 µL of Hi-C beads as template in 50 µL reactions.
  2. Collect all PCR reactions and transfer them to a fresh tube. Use the magnet to remove the streptavidin beads and recover the supernatant (PCR products). Transfer the beads to a fresh tube, wash the beads as indicated in step 11.2.9, and store in 1x restriction buffer at 4 °C as a backup.
  3. Purify the PCR products using 0.85x the volume of the SPRI beads according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Elute with 30 µL of TLE buffer.
  4. Quantify the Hi-C library using a fluorometric instrument, and confirm the quality of the library by chip-based capillary electrophoresis.
  5. As a last quality checkpoint, use 1 µL of the Hi-C library as a template to perform a PCR reaction using 10 cycles using the same conditions described in step 12.1. Divide the PCR product into two microcentrifuge tubes: digest one with Cla I and leave the other one undigested as a control. Run the products in a 1.5-2% agarose gel (see representative results).
  6. Proceed to 50 bp or 75 bp paired-end sequencing on a suitable sequencing platform.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Described below are the results of a successful Hi-C protocol (see a summary of the Hi-C protocol workflow in Figure 1A). There are several quality control checkpoints during the in-nucleus Hi-C experiment. Sample aliquots were collected before (UD) and after (D) the chromatin restriction step as well as after ligation (L). Crosslinks were reversed, and DNA was purified and run on an agarose gel. A smear of 200-1000 bp was observed when restriction with Mbo I was successful (

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The in-nucleus Hi-C method presented here has allowed detailed exploration of Drosophila genome topology at high resolution, providing a view of genomic interactions at different genomic scales, from chromatin loops between regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers to TADs and large compartment identification25. The same technology has also been efficiently applied to mammalian tissues with some modifications33. For example, when processing a tissue instead of a s...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by UNAM Technology Innovation and Research Support Program (PAPIIT) grant number IN207319 and the Science and Technology National Council (CONACyT-FORDECyT) grant number 303068. A.E.-L. is a master's student supported by the Science and Technology National Council (CONACyT) CVU number 968128.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
16% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde solutionAgar ScientificR1026
Biotin-14-dATPInvitrogenCA1524-016
ClaI enzymeNEBR0197S
COVARIS UltrasonicatorCovarisLE220-M220
Cut SmartNEBB72002S
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) 1xLife Technologies41965-039
Dynabeads MyOne Streptabidin C1Invitrogen65002
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) sterile filteredSigmaF9665
Klenow Dna PolI large fragmentNEBM0210L
Klenow exo(-)NEBM0210S
Ligation BufferNEBB020S
MboI enzymeNEBR0147M
NP40-IgepalSIGMACA-420Non-ionic surfactant for addition in lysis buffer
PE adapter 1.0Illumina5'-P-GATCGGAAGAGCGGTTCAGCAG
GAATGCCGAG-3'
PE adapter 2.0Illumina5'-ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCT
CTTCCGATCT-3'
PE PCR primer 1.0Illumina5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGAT
CTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACG
CTCTTCCGATCT-3'
PE PCR primer 2.0Illumina5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAG
ATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCTGCTGA
ACCGCTCTTCCGATCT-3'
Phenol: Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol 25:24:1SIGMAP2069
Primer 1 (known interaction, Figure 2A)Sigma5'-TCGCGGTAATTTTGCGTTTGA-3'
Primer 2 (known interactions, Figure 2A)Sigma5'-CCTCCCTGCCAAAACGTTTT-3'
Protease inhibitor cocktail tabletRoche4693132001
Proteinase KRoche3115879001
QubitThermoFisherQ33327
RNAseRoche10109142001
SPRI BeadsBeckmanB23318
T4 DNA ligaseInvitrogen15224-025
T4 DNA polymeraseNEBM0203S
T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK) NEBM0201L
TaqPhusionNEBM0530SDNA polymerase
Triton X-100Non-ionic surfactant for quenching of SDS

References

  1. Cremer, T., Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature Review Genetics. 2, 292-301 (2001).
  2. Lieberman-Aiden, E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 326, 289-293 (2009).
  3. Dixon, J. R., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 485, 376-380 (2012).
  4. Sexton, T., et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 148 (3), 458-472 (2012).
  5. Dixon, J. R., Gorkin, D. U., Ren, B. Chromatin domains: the unit of chromosome organization. Molecular Cell. 62, 668-680 (2016).
  6. Bonev, B., Cavalli, G. Organization and function of the 3D genome. Nature Reviews Genetics. 17, 661-678 (2016).
  7. Lupiáñez, D. G., Spielmann, M., Mundlos, S. Breaking TADs: how alterations of chromatin domains result in disease. Trends in Genetics. 32, 225-237 (2016).
  8. Phillips, J. E., Corces, V. G. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell. 137 (7), 1194-1211 (2009).
  9. Hong, S., Kim, D. Computational characterization of chromatin domain boundary-associated genomic elements. Nucleic Acids Research. 45, 10403-10414 (2017).
  10. Zuin, J., et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (3), 996-1001 (2014).
  11. Guo, Y., et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell. 162, 900-910 (2015).
  12. Lupiáñez, D. G., et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell. 161, 1012-1025 (2015).
  13. Van-Steensel, B., Furlong, E. E. M. The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 20, 327-337 (2019).
  14. Merkenschlager, M., Nora, E. P. CTCF and cohesin in genome folding and transcriptional gene regulation. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 17 (1), 17-43 (2016).
  15. Hansen, A. S., Pustova, I., Cattoglio, C., Tjian, R., Darzacq, X. CTCF and cohesin regulate chromatin loop stability with distinct dynamics. Elife. 6, 1-10 (2017).
  16. Van Bortle, K., et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biology. 15, 82(2014).
  17. Ramírez, F., et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nature Communications. 9, 189(2018).
  18. Ulianov, S. V., et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains. Genome Research. 26, 70-84 (2016).
  19. Rowley, M. J., et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Molecular Cell. 67, 837-852 (2017).
  20. Gavrilov, A. A., Golov, A. K., Razin, S. V. Actual ligation frequencies in the chromosome conformation capture procedure. PLoS One. 8, 60403(2013).
  21. Gavrilov, A. A., et al. Disclosure of a structural milieu for the proximity ligation reveals the elusive nature of an active chromatin hub. Nucleic Acids Research. 41, 3563-3575 (2013).
  22. Nagano, T., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature. 502, 59-64 (2013).
  23. Rao, S. S. P., et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 159 (7), 1665-1680 (2014).
  24. Nagano, T., et al. Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation. Genome Biology. 16, 175(2015).
  25. Arzate-Mejía, R., et al. In situ dissection of domain boundaries affect genome topology and gene transcription in Drosophila. Nature Communications. 11, 894(2020).
  26. Schoenfelder, S., et al. Promoter capture Hi-C: high-resolution, genome-wide profiling of promoter interactions. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (136), e57320(2018).
  27. Servant, N., et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C processing. Genome Biology. 16, 259(2015).
  28. Philip, E., Måns, M., Sverker, L., Max, K. MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 10, 1093(2016).
  29. Wingett, S., et al. HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data. F1000 Research. 4, 1310(2015).
  30. Imakaev, M., et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nature Methods. 9 (10), 999-1003 (2012).
  31. Akdemir, K. C., Chin, L. HiCPlotter integrates genomic data with interaction matrices. Genome Biolog. 16, 198(2015).
  32. Ramirez, F., et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nature Communications. 9, 189(2018).
  33. Ando-Kuri, M., et al. The global and promoter-centric 3D genome organization temporally resolved during a circadian cycle. bioRxiv. , (2020).
  34. Cuellar-Partida, G., et al. Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics. 28 (1), 56-62 (2012).
  35. Zhang, Y., et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biology. 9, 137(2008).
  36. Ong, C. -T., et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation regulates insulator function and intrachromosomal interactions in Drosophila. Cell. 155 (1), 148-159 (2013).
  37. Fresán, U., et al. The insulator protein CTCF regulates Drosophila steroidogenesis. Biology Open. 4 (7), 852-857 (2015).
  38. Quinodoz, S., et al. RNA promotes the formation of spatial compartments in the nucleus. Cell. 174, 744-757 (2018).
  39. Olivares-Chauvet, P., et al. Capturing pairwise and multi-way chromosomal conformations using chromosomal walks. Nature. 540 (7632), 296-300 (2016).
  40. Beagrie, R., et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature. 543, 519-524 (2017).
  41. Redolfi, J., et al. DamC reveals principles of chromatin folding in vivo without crosslinking and ligation. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology. 26, 471-480 (2019).
  42. Maxwell, R., et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nature Methods. 13, 919-922 (2016).
  43. Gao, X., et al. C-BERST: Defining subnuclear proteomic landscapes at genomic elements with dCas9-APEX2. Nature Methods. 15 (6), 433-436 (2018).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Chromatin OrganizationTopologically Associating DomainsTAD BoundariesArchitectural ProteinsChromatin DigestionBiotin PulldownCRISPR Genetic EditingGenomic Interactions
In-Nucleus Hi-C in Drosophila Cells
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.