$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) in blood has been demonstrated to be an optimal source of biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring, and prediction of treatment resistance1,2. Many studies have shown a good concordance between DNA alterations (mutations, copy number variations, epigenetic modifications) in tissues and those found in corresponding plasma samples1, confirming that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is informative for primary and metastatic tumor tissue alterations3. The possibility of studying ctDNA thus allows for the reconstruction of genomic rearrangements and copy number variations (CNVs) at specific oncogenes4, identifying potentially metastatic clonal and subclonal cells. CtDNA has been shown to be clinically useful especially for cancer treatment monitoring as it harbors specific mutations and CNVs, related to specific targeted therapies5,6. It also overcomes the need for tissue biopsies and allows results to be obtained at different times during a specific cancer treatment in a non-invasive manner.
With regard to prostate cancer, a significant correlation between circulating cell-free androgen receptor (AR) CNVs and treatment response to abiraterone and enzalutamide has been shown, indicating AR gene copy number (CN) in cfDNA may be a promising biomarker capable of predicting treatment resistance7,8,9,10,11. CNVs of specific genes in ctDNA can be evaluated using different approaches with different sensitivity, cost, and rapidity (e.g. real-time, Digital PCR, and Next Generation Sequencing).
Here we describe a simple and fast approach, based on duplex assays in real-time PCR technology, for evaluating AR CN in cfDNA from serum and plasma samples7,8. We considered two different PCR assays designed on two different genomic regions within intron 5 of AR (Xq12) and two other genes, as internal standard reference genes known to have a normal copy number status in prostate cancer (RNaseP, located on 14q11; AGO1, located on 1p34). We selected two reference genes, rather than one, to increase the precision and sensitivity of the results. A DNA amount of 60 ng was amplified for each assay combination (combined assay for AR-assay_1+RNaseP and for AR-assay_2+AGO1). Three serum or plasma DNA samples from healthy males were pooled and used as a calibrator. We considered cutoffs of >1.5 for AR gain and <0.5 for deletion. One of the main advantages of this method is that it is flexible and that other genes can also be evaluated, changing the standard internal reference genes, on the basis of tumor type and characteristics.