Senescent cells normally accumulate in organisms over years during normal biological aging but may also develop rapidly in tumor cells as a response to damage induced by various cancer treatments, including radiation and chemotherapy. Though no longer proliferating, therapy-induced senescent (TIS) tumor cells may contribute to treatment resistance and drive recurrence1,2,3. Factors secreted by TIS cells can exacerbate tumor malignancy by promoting immune evasion or metastasis4,5. TIS cells develop complex, context-specific phenotypes, altered metabolic profiles, and unique immune responses6,7,8. Therefore, the identification and characterization of TIS tumor cells induced by various cancer treatment approaches is a topic of ongoing interest to the cancer research community.
To detect TIS tumor cells, conventional senescence assays are widely used, primarily based on detecting increased activity of the senescence marker enzyme, the lysosomal beta-galactosidase GLB19. Detection at a near-neutral (rather than acidic) lysosomal pH allows for specific detection of senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal)10. A standard SA-β-Gal assay that has been used for several decades uses X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside), a blue chromogenic beta-galactosidase substrate, to detect SA-β-Gal in fixed cells by light microscopy11. The X-Gal assay allows the qualitative visual confirmation of TIS utilizing commonly available reagents and laboratory equipment. A basic transmitted light microscope is the only instrumentation required to evaluate the presence of the blue chromogen. However, the X-Gal staining procedure can lack sensitivity, sometimes requiring more than 24 h for color to develop. Staining is followed by low-throughput, subjective scoring of individual senescent cells based on counting the cells exhibiting some level of intensity of the blue chromogen under a light microscope. As X-Gal is cell-impermeable, this assay requires solvent-fixed cells, which cannot be recovered for downstream analysis. When working with limited samples from animals or patients, this can be a major drawback.
Improved SA-β-Gal assays using cell-permeant, fluorescent enzyme substrates, including C12-FDG (5-dodecanoylaminofluorescein Di-β-D-Galactopyranoside, green) and DDAOG (9H-(1,3-dichloro-9,9-dimethylacridin-2-one-7-yl) β-D-Galactopyranoside, far-red) have previously appeared in the literature12,13,14,15. The chemical probe structure and optical characteristics of DDAOG are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. These cell-permeant probes permit the analysis of living (rather than fixed) cells, and fluorescent rather than chromogenic probes facilitate the use of rapid high-throughput fluorescent analysis platforms, including high-content screening instruments and flow cytometers. Sorting flow cytometers enable the recovery of enriched populations of living senescent cells from cell cultures or tumors for downstream analysis (e.g., western blotting, ELISA, or 'omics). Fluorescence analysis also provides a quantitative signal, allowing for more accurate determination of the percentage of senescent cells within a given sample. Additional fluorescent probes, including viability probes and fluorophore-labeled antibodies, can readily be added for multiplexed analysis of targets beyond SA-β-Gal.
Similar to DDAOG, C12-FDG is a fluorescent probe for SA-β-Gal, but its green fluorescent emission overlaps with intrinsic cellular AF, which arises during senescence due to the accumulation of lipofuscin aggregates in cells16. By utilizing the far-red DDAOG probe, green cellular AF can be used as a secondary parameter to confirm senescence17. This improves assay reliability by using a second marker in addition to SA-β-Gal, which can often be unreliable as a single marker for senescence18. As the detection of endogenous AF in senescent cells is a label-free approach, it is a rapid and simple way to expand the specificity of our DDAOG-based assay.
In this protocol, we demonstrate the use of DDAOG and AF as a rapid, dual-parameter flow cytometry assay for the identification of viable TIS tumor cells from in vitro cultures or isolated from drug-treated tumors established in mice (Figure 1). The protocol uses fluorophores compatible with a wide range of standard commercial flow cytometry analyzers and sorters (Table 1). Quantitation of the percentage of viable senescent cells using standard flow cytometry analysis is enabled. If desired, an optional immunolabeling step may be performed to evaluate cell surface antigens of interest concurrently with senescence. Identified senescent cells can also be enriched using standard fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) methodology.

Figure 1: Experimental workflow. A schematic summarizing key points of the DDAOG assay. (A) A TIS-inducing drug is added to mammalian cultured cells or administered to tumor-bearing mice. Time is then allowed for the onset of TIS: for cells, 4 days following treatment; for mice, 22 days total, with three treatments every 5 days plus 7 days recovery. Cells are harvested or tumors are dissociated into suspension. (B) Samples are treated with Baf to adjust lysosomal pH for detection of SA-β-Gal for 30 min; then, DDAOG probe is added for 60 min to detect SA-β-Gal. Samples are washed 2x in PBS, and a viability stain is briefly added (15 min). Optionally, samples can be stained with fluorescent antibodies in open fluorescence channels and/or fixed for later analysis. (C) Samples are analyzed using a standard flow cytometer. Viable cells are visualized in dot plots showing red DDAOG (indicating SA-β-Gal) versus green autofluorescence (lipofuscin). A gate to determine the percentage of TIS cells is established based on untreated control samples (not shown). If a sorting cytometer (FACS) is used, TIS cells can be collected and placed back into culture for further in vitro assays or lysed and processed for molecular biology assays. Abbreviations: DDAO = 9H-(1,3-dichloro-9,9-dimethylacridin-2-one); DDAOG = DDAO-Galactoside; TIS = therapy-induced senescence; FL-Ab = fluorophore-conjugated antibody; Baf = Bafilomycin A1; SA-β-Gal = senescence-associated beta-galactosidase; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; FACS = fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Fluorophore | Detects | Ex/Em (nm) | Cytometer laser (nm) | Cytometer detector / bandpass filter (nm) |
| DDAOG | SA-β-Gal | 645/6601 | 640 | 670 / 30 |
| AF | Lipofuscin | < 600 | 488 | 525 / 50 |
| CV450 | Viability | 408/450 | 405 | 450 / 50 |
| PE | Antibody/surface marker | 565/578 | 561 | 582 / 15 |
Table 1: Fluorophores and cytometer optical specifications. Cytometer specifications used in this protocol are listed for an instrument with a total of 4 lasers and 15 emission detectors. DDAOG detected at 645/660 nm is the form of the probe cleaved by SA-β-Gal1. Uncleaved DDAOG can exhibit low level fluorescence at 460/610 nm but is removed by wash steps in the protocol. Abbreviations: DDAO = 9H-(1,3-dichloro-9,9-dimethylacridin-2-one); DDAOG = DDAO-Galactoside; AF = autofluorescence; PE = phycoerythrin; SA-β-Gal = senescence-associated beta-galactosidase.