Live Imaging of Dorsal Root Axons after Rhizotomy

Neuroscience

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Neuroscience section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:

 

Summary

An in vivo imaging protocol to monitor primary sensory axons following dorsal root crush is described. The procedures utilize wide-field fluorescence microscopy and thy1-YFP transgenic mice, and permit repeated imaging of axon regeneration over 4 cm in the PNS and axon interactions with the interface of the CNS.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations

Skuba, A., Himes, B. T., Son, Y. Live Imaging of Dorsal Root Axons after Rhizotomy. J. Vis. Exp. (55), e3126, doi:10.3791/3126 (2011).

Abstract

The primary sensory axons injured by spinal root injuries fail to regenerate into the spinal cord, leading to chronic pain and permanent sensory loss. Regeneration of dorsal root (DR) axons into spinal cord is prevented at the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ), the interface between the CNS and PNS. Our understanding of the molecular and cellular events that prevent regeneration at DREZ is incomplete, in part because complex changes associated with nerve injury have been deduced from postmortem analyses. Dynamic cellular processes, such as axon regeneration, are best studied with techniques that capture real-time events with multiple observations of each living animal. Our ability to monitor neurons serially in vivo has increased dramatically owing to revolutionary innovations in optics and mouse transgenics. Several lines of thy1-GFP transgenic mice, in which subsets of neurons are genetically labeled in distinct fluorescent colors, permit individual neurons to be imaged in vivo1. These mice have been used extensively for in vivo imaging of muscle2-4 and brain5-7, and have provided novel insights into physiological mechanisms that static analyses could not have resolved. Imaging studies of neurons in living spinal cord have only recently begun. Lichtman and his colleagues first demonstrated their feasibility by tracking injured dorsal column (DC) axons with wide-field microscopy8,9. Multi-photon in vivo imaging of deeply positioned DC axons, microglia and blood vessels has also been accomplished10. Over the last few years, we have pioneered in applying in vivo imaging to monitor regeneration of DR axons using wide-field microscopy and H line of thy1-YFP mice. These studies have led us to a novel hypothesis about why DR axons are prevented from regenerating within the spinal cord11.

In H line of thy1-YFP mice, distinct YFP+ axons are superficially positioned, which allows several axons to be monitored simultaneously. We have learned that DR axons arriving at DREZ are better imaged in lumbar than in cervical spinal cord. In the present report we describe several strategies that we have found useful to assure successful long-term and repeated imaging of regenerating DR axons. These include methods that eliminate repeated intubation and respiratory interruption, minimize surgery-associated stress and scar formation, and acquire stable images at high resolution without phototoxicity.

Protocol

1. Microscope set up and imaging preparation

  1. Our imaging set up consists of a Leica MZ16 fluorescent stereomicroscope with a fast shutter and a cooled CCD camera controlled by Metamorph software.
  2. Prepare a thermostatically controlled heating pad and adjust output to 32.5°C to maintain the animal's body temperature during and following surgery.
  3. Warm sterile Ringer's solution or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) to 32.5°C in advance for irrigation of spinal cord during surgery.
  4. Anesthetize the animal with an intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (8 mg/kg) and ketamine (120 mg/kg) cocktail.
  5. Shave the upper back with small animal clippers and spread one small drop of hair removal lotion over the shaved area with cotton-tipped swabs. Minutes later, remove the applied lotion using 70% ethanol soaked gauze sponges.

2. Laminectomy and surgical exposure of the L5 dorsal root

  1. Place the animal on a heated (32.5° C) pad and disinfect the skin with 70% ethanol soaked swabs.
  2. Under bright field illumination on the stereomicroscope, perform a midline incision (2- to 3-cm) in the skin of the back. If necessary, use cotton-tipped swabs to stop bleeding.
  3. Reflect the spinal musculature to expose the underlying lumbar vertebrae.
  4. Expose the L3-S1 spinal segments by right-sided hemi-laminectomy using small rongeurs. A partial laminectomy exposing 4-6 segments of the lumbar and sacral spinal cord is created by removing the right dorsal portion of the L5 vertebrae at the level of the iliac crest of the hip (location of L5 DRG) rostrally to the L2 vertebrae (2 vertebrae caudal to the last rib). Perfuse the cavity with warm sterile Ringer's solution.
  5. Position the animal on a support cushion (rolled cotton gauze) to flatten the vertebral column. Use retraction hooks to widen the exposed area.
  6. At this point (approximately 30 minutes after the first i.p. injection of anesthetic, a supplement (0.5X) should be injected subcutaneously in order to keep the animal fully anesthetized. Alternatively, gas anesthesia (2-4% isoflurane in 0.5L/min oxygen) can be used for repeated anesthetization during imaging sessions longer than 1 hour.

3. Rhizotomy/Dorsal root crush

  1. Switch to fluorescence excitation to visualize YFP labeled (+) axons.
  2. Using the tip of a Sub-Q (26ga.) needle, perform a small incision in the dura overlying the L5 dorsal root (DR). Perfuse repeatedly with Ringer's solution and clean gently with cotton-tipped swabs.
  3. Identify the site to be crushed and insert one side of a fine forceps (Dumont #5) subdurally.
  4. Close the forceps gently but firmly, holding the medial portion of the L5 root for 10 seconds, and then gently release the forceps.
  5. Wash repeatedly with physiological solution and clean gently with cotton-tipped swabs.

4. Image acquisition and post-op procedures

  1. Obtain multiple images of the whole exposed area including the crush site and the DREZ before and right after the crush at both low and high magnification.
  2. Images are acquired either as single snapshots or as multiple streams of 10 to 20 frames acquired within 30- to 40-ms exposure time. In-focus images are then selected, and an overview montage is created later using Photoshop.
  3. To minimize scar formation, tightly apply a piece of thin synthetic matrix membrane (Biobrane), followed by artificial dura, on top of the exposed spinal cord. Be sure to cut pieces to fit precisely in the exposed spinal cord window so that they are adherent to the spinal cord.
  4. Close the musculature with sterile 5-0 sutures and close the midline incision with wound clips.
  5. Inject Ringer's solution (0.3- to 0.5-mL subcutaneously), and administer Buprenorphine as postoperative analgesia (0.05 mg/kg) subcutaneously every 12 h for 2 days.
  6. Keep the animal on a heating pad (34°-35° C) until recovered.

5. Repeated imaging

  1. Anesthetize the animal and remove the wound clips and sutures.
  2. Remove artificial dura and thin synthetic matrix membrane patches and keep them in a sterile tube containing Ringer's solution for later reuse.
  3. Gently remove any accumulated connective tissue scar with the bent tip of a Sub-Q needle and fine forceps. Perfuse frequently with warm Ringer's solution.
  4. Re-expose the operative field, including crush site and DREZ, relocate YFP+ axons imaged in previous sessions, and repeat the procedures described in Section 4.

6. Representative results:

We have observed that, whereas they did not regenerate after a transection injury, almost all YFP+ axons grew through the site of injury by 3 days after crush (Figure 1)11. Typically, the next day after crush, we observed dying-back degeneration of proximal stump axons and fragmentation/degeneration of the same axons distal to the crush, which confirmed that axons had been appropriately damaged (e.g., Figure 1; Day 3 and 5). Several additional criteria are applied to unambiguously distinguish regenerating axons from axons that were spared or had recovered from the injury. These included the following: (1) regenerating axons show an expansion of the non-fluorescent portion of the YFP+ axon at the crush site due to proximal and distal degeneration (in contrast to narrowing of the unlabeled gap due to fluorescent cytoplasm refilling the crush site if axons survived the injury); (2) regenerating axons are much thinner, less brightly fluorescent, and more undulating than axons that survived the injury; (3) regenerating neurites are thinner and more dimly fluorescent than the degenerating fluorescent fragments of axons through which they extended; (4) in contrast to surviving or spared axons, regenerating axons stop at the DREZ; and (5) in contrast to surviving or spared axons, regenerating axons do not exhibit nodes of Ranvier. Figure 1 shows four superficial YFP+ axons immediately after crush (A1; colored arrows). Three days after the crush, all four axons extend a single neurite that grows through the crush site (A2). Five days after crush, neurites remain stable and there is no additional growth from these or other proximal axons (A3).

The regenerating neurites that crossed the crush site elongated through much thicker and brighter fluorescent fragments of a degenerating axon (i.e., endoneurial tubes), and arrive at the DREZ as early as 4 days after the crush (about 3mm/2 days)11. Repeated imaging of these axons and their tips every two or three days for two more weeks (Figure 2) revealed that they did not grow forward or retract, but remained immobile. The only noticeable change was swelling of the tips and shafts of some axons. These observations therefore demonstrate surprisingly quick and chronic immobilization of the regenerating axons at the DREZ.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Repeated imaging of L5 DR YFP+ axons at the site of dorsal root crush over 5 days. The medial portion of the L5 root was crushed (red arrowhead) and imaged on Days 0, 3, and 5 after the crush. The area of the crush is magnified in the right panels (A1-A3).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Repeated imaging of axons arrived at the DREZ over 20 days after L5 root crush. Day 4, three axons (colored arrows) arrived at the DREZ. The tips of these axons remain in the same location and have a similar appearance in subsequent imaging sessions on Days 7, 9, 13, 15, and 20. Positions of an axon tip relative to other axon tips and landmarks (asterisks) were used to determine axon motility between imaging sessions.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Imaging DR regeneration directly in living mice is particularly challenging because it requires a substantial dorsal laminectomy to monitor axon growth over a wide area followed by multiple invasive surgical and anesthetic procedures in subsequent imaging sessions. Several strategies helped to overcome these challenges. First, successful imaging required reducing mouse mortality (approximately 25%) by minimizing the duration of anesthesia and bleeding, and by meticulous post-op care. The mortality was also reduced by using settings that permit fast camera speed to quickly acquire multiple images without intubation or respiratory interruption. Preventing scar accumulation on the exposed cord was also essential. These collagenous scars develop rapidly between imaging sessions and form a thin but opaque layer on the dura surface. Removal is tedious, prolongs the image session and risks damage to vasculature and axons. An effective strategy for scar removal was to apply a thin matrix membrane that tightly adhered to the exposed cord and caused scars to accumulate on the membrane rather than on the dura. Because of the potential for confounding effects due to artifacts from surgical procedures and photoxicity, we carried out extensive control experiments in which we examined axonal profiles in mice without repetitive imaging or surgery.

The protocols utilize widefield microscopy with settings that permit fast camera speed and image acquisition, without intubation or respiratory interruption. We acquire multiple images of superficial axons and later select the best images with the least distortion due to breathing movements. This method provides insufficient spatial resolution, however, although it permits easy identification and tracking of the superficially positioned DR axons over a wide area: it was impossible to have the entirety of multiple axons focused in each imaging session, or to obtain clear images of several axon tips simultaneously and repeatedly each time.

To facilitate identification of the same axons in repeated imaging sessions, one can consider using fluorescent microsphere beads (1μm, Invitrogen) to create more 'landmarks', in addition to the intrinsic ones (i.e., unique branching patterns of blood vessels and adjacent axons). Even if the growth tips are extremely dynamic and change shape quickly, one can identify them by their parental axon shaft, which remains unchanged peripherally.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Alan Tessler for comments and editorial help. This work was supported by NIH NS062320.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
H line thy1-YFP (2-4 months old, either sex) Jackson Laboratory 003782
Xylazine (AnaSed injection, sterile solution) Lloyd, Inc. 4811 8 mg/kg
Ketamine (Ketamine hydrochloride injection, USP) Hospira Inc. 2051 120 mg/kg
Buprenorphine (Buprenex injectable) (0.05 mg/kg) Reckitt Benckiser 7571
Small animal hair clippers Oster Professional Products 76059-030
Hair removal lotion Church & Dwight Co. NAIR with Baby Oil
Gauze sponges Fisher Scientific 22-362-173
Cotton-tipped swabs Fisher Scientific 14-960-3Q
1 mL syringes BD Biosciences 309602
Subcutaneous (Sub-Q) needles, 26ga. BD Biosciences 305115
Spring scissors and forceps Fine Science Tools
2.5-mm curved rongeurs Fine Science Tools 16221-14
Lactated Ringer’s Injection USP B. Braun Medical BBR-L7502
Sterile saline solution APP Pharmaceuticals 918610
Thin synthetic matrix membrane (Biobrane) Bertek Pharmaceuticals 62794-096-251
Artificial dura Gore Preclude MVP Dura Substitute, W.L. Gore and Associates 1MVP40
5-0 silk sutures Ethicon Inc. K-580
Wound clips Perfect - Ets Bruneau, (Burnea, France) A75
Fluorescent stereomicroscope Leica Microsystems MZ16
CCD camera Hamamatsu Corp. ORCA-Rx2
Temperature Controller World Precision Instruments, Inc. ATC 1000
Metamorph software Molecular Devices
Photoshop Adobe

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Feng, G. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 28, 41-51 (2000).
  2. Lichtman, J. W., Sanes, J. R. Watching the neuromuscular junction. J Neurocytol. 32, 767-775 (2003).
  3. Bishop, D. L., Misgeld, T., Walsh, M. K., Gan, W. B., Lichtman, J. W. Axon branch removal at developing synapses by axosome shedding. Neuron. 44, 651-661 (2004).
  4. Balice-Gordon, R. J., Lichtman, J. W. in vivo visualization of the growth of pre- and postsynaptic elements of neuromuscular junctions in the mouse. J Neurosci. 10, 894-908 (1990).
  5. Trachtenberg, J. T. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature. 420, 788-794 (2002).
  6. Pan, F., Gan, W. B. Two-photon imaging of dendritic spine development in the mouse cortex. Dev Neurobiol. 68, 771-778 (2008).
  7. Grutzendler, J., Gan, W. B. Two-photon imaging of synaptic plasticity and pathology in the living mouse brain. NeuroRx. 3, 489-496 (2006).
  8. Kerschensteiner, M., Schwab, M. E., Lichtman, J. W., Misgeld, T. in vivo imaging of axonal degeneration and regeneration in the injured spinal cord. Nat Med. 11, 572-577 (2005).
  9. Misgeld, T., Nikic, I., Kerschensteiner, M. in vivo imaging of single axons in the mouse spinal cord. Nat Protoc. 2, 263-268 (2007).
  10. Davalos, D. Stable in vivo imaging of densely populated glia, axons and blood vessels in the mouse spinal cord using two-photon microscopy. J Neurosci Methods. 169, 1-7 (2008).
  11. Maio, D. D. i in vivo imaging of dorsal root regeneration: Rapid immobilization and presynaptic differentiation at the CNS/PNS border. Journal of Neuroscience. 31, 4569-4582 (2011).

Comments

0 Comments


    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Usage Statistics