A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation: A High Throughput Quantitative Method to Study Protein-protein Interaction

18K views

DOI:

10.3791/50529

August 15th, 2013

In This Article

Summary

Flow cytometric analysis of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation provides a high throughput quantitative method to study protein-protein interaction. This methodology can be applied to mapping protein binding sites and for screening factors that regulate protein-protein interaction.

Abstract

Among methods to study protein-protein interaction inside cells, Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) is relatively simple and sensitive. BiFC is based on the production of fluorescence using two non-fluorescent fragments of a fluorescent protein (Venus, a Yellow Fluorescent Protein variant, is used here). Non-fluorescent Venus fragments (VN and VC) are fused to two interacting proteins (in this case, AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3), yielding fluorescence due to VN-AKAP-Lbc-VC-PDE4D3 interaction and the formation of a functional fluorescent protein inside cells.

BiFC provides information on the subcellular localization of protein complexes and the strength of protein interactions based on fluorescence intensity. However, BiFC analysis using microscopy to quantify the strength of protein-protein interaction is time-consuming and somewhat subjective due to heterogeneity in protein expression and interaction. By coupling flow cytometric analysis with BiFC methodology, the fluorescent BiFC protein-protein interaction signal can be accurately measured for a large quantity of cells in a short time. Here, we demonstrate an application of this methodology to map regions in PDE4D3 that are required for the interaction with AKAP-Lbc. This high throughput methodology can be applied to screening factors that regulate protein-protein interaction.

Introduction

650,000 protein-protein interactions are estimated to exist in the human interactome, playing critical roles in maintaining normal cell functions 1,2. Besides co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), the gold standard to study protein-protein interaction from cell lysate, several protein fragment complementation assays (PCA) have been developed to improve sensitivity in detecting protein-protein interaction inside cells 3. Techniques include Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET), and Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) 4,5. BiFC is based on the facilitated association of two fragments of a fluorescent protein (here we use Venus; a YFP variant) that are each fused to a potential interacting protein partner (in this example we use AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3). Interaction of the two proteins of interest inside cells results in functional fluorescence, which can be visualized by fluorescence microscopy using either live or fixed cells 6,7,8. Compared to other PCAs, BiFC is sensitive and less technically challenging, with potential to study the cellular localization in live cells. A major drawback of this technique however is that once formed, the fluorescent protein complex cannot be reversed. Therefore it is not a good method to study dynamic protein-protein interaction. In this paper, we use BiFC to map the interaction sites of PDE4D3 with AKAP-Lbc by monitoring the fluorescence intensities of Venus. Compared to traditional analysis using fluorescence microscopy, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive (if not carried out using automated high throughput machinery), flow cytometry provides a straightforward quantitative analysis of thousands of cells in a heterogeneous population over a short time 9,10. Here, by carrying out a side-by-side comparison of flow cytometric-BiFC analysis and traditional co-IP, we demonstrate that the two methods provide comparable data, however, flow cytometric BiFC analysis is less time consuming and uses less material which may be more useful when cells of interest are limited.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Cell Transfection

  1. Plate cells the day before transfection, plating fewer cells for immunofluorescence.
    1. For immunofluorescence: in a 6-well plate, coat glass cover slips (1 per well) with 0.02% gelatin at 37 °C for at least 4 hr, wash once with medium, and for each well, plate 1 x 105 HEK 293T cells in 2 ml complete growth medium [Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media (DMEM) plus 10% FBS].
    2. For flow cytometric and Western blot analyses: plate 1.2 x 105 HEK 293T cells/well in 2 ml complete growth medium in 6-well plate (0.3 x 105 HEK 293T cells in 0.5 ml complete growth medium per well in 24-well plate).
  2. Prepare DNA for transfection according to manufacture's protocol: Effectene (Qiagen) is used for immunofluorescence. TransIT-LT1 (Mirus) is used for flow cytometric and Western blot analyses. Amount of DNA used is listed below.
     24-well plate (ng)6-well plate (ng)
    CFP-vector1050
    VNN-AKAP-Lbc2001000
    VCN-PDE4D3-FL(full-length PDE4D3)2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80100
    VCN-PDE4D3-UCR1(a PDE4D3 N-terminal fragment containing the UCR1 domain) 100
    VCN-PDE4D3-UCR2+CAT (a PDE4D3 C-terminal fragment containing the UCR2 and catalytic domains) 100
    Transfection using Effectene (6-well):
    1. Add indicated amount of plasmid DNA + 4 μl enhancer to 100 μl buffer EC, mix, and incubate for 5 min at room temperature.
    2. Add 5 μl Effectene, mix, and incubate for 10 min at room temperature. Add drop-wise to cells.
    Transfection using TransIT-LT1 (6-well/24-well):
    1. Add indicated amount of plasmid DNA to 250 μl/50 μl of Opti-MEM I serum-free medium in a sterile tube.
    2. Add TransIT-LT1 reagent to the diluted DNA mixture and pipette gently to mix. (TransIT-LT1 Reagent:DNA ratio is 3 μl of TransIT-LT1 reagent per 1 μg of DNA).
    3. Incubate for 30 min at room temperature and add drop-wise to cells.

2. Cell Preparation for Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, and Immunofluorescence

  1. 24 hr post transfection, check fluorescence under epifluorescence microscope before harvesting cells.
  2. Cell preparation for flow cytometric analysis:
    1. Wash cells with 0.5 ml/2 ml ice-cold PBS for 24-well/6-well plates.
    2. Detach cells using 50 μl/250 μl 0.05% trypsin.
    3. Neutralize trypsin with 200 μl/1 ml DMEM medium.
    4. Collect 250 μl cells (for both 24-well and 6-well plate) by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min, use the remaining cells (1 ml) for Western blot analysis.
    5. Resuspend cells in 250 μl FACS buffer [PBS + 0.5% (w/v) BSA + 2 mM EDTA], store on ice for flow cytometric analysis. Cells can also be fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) if flow cytometry analysis will not be immediate.
  3. Cell preparation for Western blot analysis: carried out in parallel with cell preparation for flow cytometry analysis.
    1. Wash cells 1x with 2 ml ice-cold PBS, lyse cells by adding 100 μl of cell lysis buffer [10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.95, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100].
    2. Collect cell lysate by centrifugation for 10 min at 21,000 x g at 4 °C.
    3. Quantify protein concentration by Bradford protein assay, load equal amounts of protein per lane for SDS-PAGE, and transfer to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting.
  4. Cell preparation for immunofluorescence.
    1. Rinse cells 3x with 2 ml PBS, fix cells in 1 ml of 3.7% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature, then wash 3x with 2 ml PBS for 5 min.
    2. Mount cover slip on a glass slide, using mounting medium. Seal the coverslip edges using nail polish if necessary.
    3. Store the slides at 4 °C prior to examination.

3. Flow Cytometry and Immunofluorescence Microscopy

  1. Flow cytometry is performed using a Beckman Coulter Cyan ADP, equipped with 488 nm, 405 nm, and 642 nm solid-state lasers. Summit software is used for acquisition and analysis.
    1. Calibrate flow cytometer using standard beads.
    2. Plot Forward scatter (FSC)/Sideward scatter (SSC) on a linear scale for gating live cell population.
    3. Plot FSC/voltage pulse width for gating non-aggregated live cell population.
    4. Plot count/FL6 (CFP fluorescence, 405 nm) on a log scale for gating non-aggregated live CFP-positive cells.
    5. Plot count/FL1 (YFP fluorescence, 488 nm) on a log scale for BiFC intensity.
    6. Run YFP-CFP- double negative samples, adjust FSC, SSC, FL1 and FL6 photo multiplier tube (PMT) voltage to set the threshold for each signal.
    7. Run single positive (both YFP+ and CFP+) samples for future off-line compensation
    8. Acquire at least 10,000 gated events (non-aggregated live CFP+ cells) for analysis.
  2. Immunofluorescence microscopy is performed using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. Note: it is important to keep all settings (such as the zoom, pinhole, detector gain, amplifier offset, frame size, scan speed, scan average, and laser power) consistent between samples for proper comparison of all data.

4. Data Analysis (Performed Using Summit Software)

  1. Set up the analysis protocol similar to that for acquisition with proper gating:
    Gate 1 in FSC/SSC dot plot for live cells.
    Gate 2 in FSC/pulse width of Gate 1 for non-aggregated live cells.
    Gate 3 in count/CFP of Gate 3 for non-aggregated CFP+ live cells.
  2. Compensate YFP and CFP signal using YFP+ and CFP+ single positive cells.
  3. Re-determine cut-off lines for CFP/YFP-positive cells.
  4. Export YFP mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CFP+ cells to Excel for data-plotting.
  5. Normalize YFP MFI to expression levels of AKAP-Lbc, PDE4D3, and loading control α-tubulin, as determined by Western blot.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3 constructs (Figure 1B) were fused to VN and VC fragments, respectively. Interaction of AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3 results in functional YFP fluorescence (Figure 1A). Here we use the BiFC method to map AKAP-Lbc-binding sites in PDE4D3. Upstream conserved region 1 (UCR1), upstream conserved region 2 (UCR2) and catalytic region (CAT) are conserved among PDE4 family proteins, therefore, full length (FL), UCR1 and UCR2 plus CAT were used for screening the binding site of PDE4D3 t...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

BiFC is a simple and sensitive method to study protein-protein interaction. This method cannot be used to identify new protein-protein interactions, however, it is especially convenient to confirm protein-protein interaction inside cells and to study functional properties; such as subcellular localization of protein complexes, mapping of protein-protein interaction sites, and for screening of small molecules/peptides that can modulate protein-protein interaction. Because VN and VC fragments are non-fluorescent, backgroun...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We thank the O'Bryan lab at UIC for critical experimental evaluation and discussion. This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant 11SDG5230003 to GKC and National Center for Advancing Translational Science - UIC Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences Grant UL1TR000050.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
REAGENTS
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM)Invitrogen11965-092
Penicilin-Streptomycin (pen/strep), 100xInvitrogen15070-063
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Invitrogen16000-044
Anti-Flag antibodySigmaM2, F1804
Anti-HA antibodyCovance16B12, MMS-101R
α-tubulinSigmaDM1A, T9026
Anti-GFP antibodyClontech632569
Cell culture plates, 6-well tissue culture treatedThermo Fisher Scientific130184
HEK 293T cellsATCCCRL-11268
Maxiprep plasmid purification kit, high speedQiagen12663
Dulbecco’s Phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), sterile 1xInvitrogen14190-144
Trypsin-EDTA, 0.05% (w/v)Gibco25300
Polystyrene round-bottom tubes for FACS stainingBD Biosciences352052
ParaformaldehydeFisher ScientificS74337MF
Prolong gold antifade reagent with DAPIInvitrogenP-36931
Superfrost plus Microscope slidesFisher Scientific12-550-15
Fisherfinest premium cover glassFisher Scientific12-548-5P
EQUIPMENT
CO2 air-jacketed IncubatorNuAIR DH autoflow
Confocal microscope LSM510 METACarl Zeiss, Inc
Electrophoresis and transfer unitBiorad
Cyan ADP Flow CytometerBeckman Coulter

References

  1. Collura, V., Boissy, G. From protein-protein complexes to interactomics. Subcell Biochem. 43, 135-183 (2007).
  2. Stumpf, M. P., et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 6959-6964 (2008).
  3. Shekhawat, S. S., Ghosh, I. Split-protein systems: beyond binary protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15, 789-797 (2011).
  4. Dwane, S., Kiely, P. A. Tools used to study how protein complexes are assembled in signaling cascades. Bioeng. Bugs. 2, 247-259 (2011).
  5. Piehler, J. New methodologies for measuring protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 4-14 (2005).
  6. Kerppola, T. K. Design and implementation of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1278-1286 (2006).
  7. Shyu, Y. J., Suarez, C. D., Hu, C. D. Visualization of ternary complexes in living cells by using a BiFC-based FRET assay. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1693-1702 (2008).
  8. Wong, K. A., O'Bryan, J. P. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation. J. Vis. Exp. (50), e2643(2011).
  9. Sugarbaker, E. V., Thornthwaite, J. T., Temple, W. T., Ketcham, A. S. Flow cytometry: general principles and applications to selected studies in tumor biology. Int. Adv. Surg. Oncol. 2, 125-153 (1979).
  10. Koshy, S., Alizadeh, P., Timchenko, L. T., Beeton, C. Quantitative measurement of GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane by flow cytometry. J. Vis. Exp. (45), e2429(2010).
  11. Smith, C. L. Basic confocal microscopy. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. Chapter 14 (Unit 14), 11(2008).
  12. Westwick, J. K., Lamerdin, J. E. Improving drug discovery with contextual assays and cellular systems analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 756, 61-73 (2011).
  13. Kilpatrick, L. E., Holliday, N. D. Dissecting the pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptor signaling complexes using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Methods Mol. Biol. 897, 109-138 (2012).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Flow CytometryFluorescence IntensityHigh Throughput ScreeningVenus Fluorescent ProteinWestern BlotSubcellular LocalizationTransfection MethodMean Fluorescence Intensity