$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The versatile and robust nature of synthetic polymers has made them a ubiquitous fixture of modern human existence. On the flip side, the same robust and environmentally resistant properties make polymer waste exceedingly persistent. This, together with the fact that a large fraction of all synthetic polymers ever made has ended up in landfills1, has raised legitimate concerns about their environmental effects2. Additionally, the open-loop nature of the traditional polymer economy has caused a steady consumption of petrochemical resources and a mounting carbon footprint3. Promising routes to a closed-loop polymer economy are, thus, highly sought after.
Chemical recycling to monomer (CRM) is one such route. The advantage of CRM over traditional recycling is that it leads to the regeneration of monomers that can be used to manufacture pristine polymers, as opposed to mechanical recycling of materials with deteriorating properties over multiple processing cycles. Polymers based on ring-opening polymerizations have appeared as especially attractive routes to CRM materials4. The thermodynamics of polymerization is typically an interplay between two opposing factors: the enthalpy of polymerization (ΔHp, which is typically negative and favors polymerization) and the entropy of polymerization (ΔSp, which is also typically negative but disfavors polymerization), with the ceiling temperature (Tc) being the temperature at which these two factors balance each other out5. For a polymer to be capable of CRM under practical and economically beneficial conditions, the right balance of ΔHp and ΔSp must be achieved. Cyclic monomers allow a convenient means to tune these factors via the selection of the appropriate ring size and geometry, since here, ΔHp is primarily determined by the ring strain of the cyclic monomers4,5. As a result, CRM polymers with a wide variety of monomers have been reported of late6,7,8,9,10,11. Out of these systems, ROMP polymers prepared from cyclopentenes are particularly promising due to the rather cheap starting material required and the hydrolytic and thermal stability of the polymers. Additionally, in the absence of a metathesis catalyst, the depolymerization is kinetically unfeasible, affording high thermal stability despite a low Tc12. However, cyclopentenes (and other monomers based on small cyclic structures) pose a key challenge-they cannot be readily functionalized, as the presence of functional groups on the backbone can affect the thermodynamics of polymerization in drastic, and sometimes unpredictable, ways13,14.
Recently, we reported a system that overcomes some of these challenges15. Inspired by examples of low-strain fused ring cyclooctenes in the literature16,17, a new CRM system was designed based on ROMP polymers of trans-cyclobutane fused cyclooctenes (tCBCO) (Figure 1A). The tCBCO monomers could be prepared at a gram scale from the [2+2] photo cycloadduct of maleic anhydride and 1,5-cyclooctadiene, which could be readily functionalized to achieve a diverse set of substituents (Figure 1B). The resulting monomers had ring strains comparable to cyclopentene (~5 kcal·mol−1, as calculated using DFT). Thermodynamic studies revealed a low ΔHp (−1.7 kcal·mol−1 to −2.8 kcal·mol−1), which was offset by a low ΔSp (−3.6 kcal·mol−1·K−1 to −4.9 kcal·mol−1·K−1), allowing the preparation of high molecular weight polymers (at high monomer concentrations) and near quantitative depolymerization (>90%, under dilute conditions) at ambient temperatures in the presence of Grubbs II catalyst (G2). It was also demonstrated that materials with diverse thermomechanical properties could be obtained while preserving the ease of polymerization/depolymerization. This ability was further exploited to prepare a soft elastomeric network (which could also be readily depolymerized), as well as a rigid thermoplastic (with tensile properties comparable to polystyrene).
One drawback with this system was the need for high monomer concentrations to access high molecular weight polymers. At the same time, due to extensive chain transfer and cyclization reactions, the polymerization was uncontrolled in nature. This was addressed in a subsequent work via photochemical isomerization of the Z-alkene in the tCBCO monomers to prepare highly strained E-alkene tCBCO monomers18. These monomers could be rapidly polymerized in a living manner at low initial monomer concentrations (≥25 mM) in the presence of Grubbs I catalyst (G1) and excess triphenylphosphine (PPh3). The polymers could then be depolymerized to yield the Z-alkene form of the monomers. This has created opportunities to access new depolymerizable polymer architectures, including block copolymers and graft/bottlebrush copolymers.
In this work, detailed protocols are outlined for the synthesis of tCBCO monomers with different functional groups and their polymerization, as well as the depolymerization of the resulting polymers. Additionally, protocols for the preparation of dogbone samples of a soft elastomeric network and their depolymerization, as well as compression molding of the N-phenylimide substituted rigid thermoplastic polymer, are also described. Finally, protocols for the photoisomerization of a tCBCO monomer to its strained E-alkene tCBCO form and its subsequent living ROMP are also discussed.