Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Developmental Biology

Vitrification of In Vitro Matured Oocytes Collected from Adult and Prepubertal Ovaries in Sheep

Published: July 10, 2021 doi: 10.3791/62272

Summary

The protocol aims at providing a standard method for the vitrification of adult and juvenile sheep oocytes. It includes all the steps from the preparation of the in vitro maturation media to the post-warming culture. Oocytes are vitrified at the MII stage using Cryotop to ensure the minimum essential volume.

Abstract

In livestock, in vitro embryo production systems can be developed and sustained thanks to the large number of ovaries and oocytes that can be easily obtained from a slaughterhouse. Adult ovaries always bear several antral follicles, while in pre-pubertal donors the maximal numbers of oocytes are available at 4 weeks of age, when ovaries bear peak numbers of antral follicles. Thus, 4 weeks old lambs are considered good donors, even if the developmental competence of prepubertal oocytes is lower compared to their adult counterpart.

Basic research and commercial applications would be boosted by the possibility of successfully cryopreserving vitrified oocytes obtained from both adult and prepubertal donors. The vitrification of oocyte collected from prepubertal donors would also allow shortening the generation interval and thus increasing the genetic gain in breeding programs. However, the loss of developmental potential after cryopreservation makes mammalian oocytes probably one of the most difficult cell types to cryopreserve. Among the available cryopreservation techniques, vitrification is widely applied to animal and human oocytes. Despite recent advancements in the technique, exposures to high concentrations of cryoprotective agents as well as chilling injury and osmotic stress still induce several structural and molecular alterations and reduce the developmental potential of mammalian oocytes. Here, we describe a protocol for the vitrification of sheep oocytes collected from juvenile and adult donors and matured in vitro prior to cryopreservation. The protocol includes all the procedures from oocyte in vitro maturation to vitrification, warming and post-warming incubation period. Oocytes vitrified at the MII stage can indeed be fertilized following warming, but they need extra time prior to fertilization to restore damage due to cryopreservation procedures and to increase their developmental potential. Thus, post-warming culture conditions and timing are crucial steps for the restoration of oocyte developmental potential, especially when oocyte are collected from juvenile donors.

Introduction

Long-term storage of the female gametes can offer a wide range of applications, such as improving domestic animal breeding by genetic selection programs, contributing to preserve biodiversity through the ex-situ wildlife species conservation program, and boosting in vitro biotechnology research and applications thanks to the availability of stored oocytes to be incorporated in in vitro embryo production or nuclear transplantation programs1,2,3. Juvenile oocyte vitrification would also increase genetic gain by shortening the generation interval in breeding programs4. Vitrification by ultra-rapid cooling and warming of oocytes is currently considered a standard approach for livestock oocytes cryopreservation5. In ruminants, before vitrification, oocytes are usually matured in vitro, after retrieval from follicles obtained from abattoir-derived ovaries2. Adult, and especially prepubertal ovaries4,6, can indeed supply a virtually unlimited number of oocytes to be cryopreserved.

In cattle, after oocyte vitrification and warming, blastocyst yields at >10% have been commonly reported by several laboratories during the last decade3. However, in small ruminants oocyte vitrification is still considered relatively new for both juvenile and adult oocytes, and a standard method for sheep oocyte vitrification remains to be established2,5. Despite recent advancements, the vitrified and warmed oocyte indeed presents several functional and structural alterations that limit their developmental potential7,8,9. Thus, few articles have reported blastocyst development at 10% or more in vitrified/warmed sheep oocytes2. Several approaches have been investigated to reduce the above-mentioned alterations: optimizing the composition of the vitrification and thawing solutions10,11; experimenting with the use of different cryo-devices8,12,13; and applying specific treatments during in vitro maturation (IVM)4,14,15 and/or during the recovery time after warming6.

Here we describe a protocol for the vitrification of sheep oocytes collected from juvenile and adult donors and matured in vitro prior to cryopreservation. The protocol includes all the procedures from oocyte in vitro maturation to vitrification, warming and post-warming culture period.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

The animal protocol and the implemented procedures described below are in accordance with the ethical guidelines in force at the University of Sassari, in compliance with the European Union Directive 86/609/EC and the recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities 2007/526/EC.

1. Preparation of media for oocyte manipulation

  1. Prepare the medium for transport of collected ovaries by supplementing Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline with 0.1 g/L penicillin and 0.1 g/L streptomycin (PBS).
  2. Prepare the medium for oocyte collection and maturation by diluting 9.5 g of Tissue Culture Medium (TCM) 199 in powder with 1 L of Milli-Q water supplemented with penicillin (0.1%) and streptomycin (0.1%).
    1. After dilution, filter 100 mL of medium and store it at 4 °C as Stock Maturation Medium (SMM) to be used for one week.
    2. Prepare the collection medium (CM) by supplementing the remaining 900 mL with 25 mM HEPES, 0.36 g/L bicarbonate and 0.1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (pH 7.3, osmolality 290 mOsm/kg).
  3. Prepare the maturation medium with SMM supplemented with 0.021 g/L bicarbonate, 10% heat-treated estrus sheep serum, 1 IU/mL FSH, 1 IU/mL LH, 100 µL of cysteamine and 8 mg/mL of pyruvate.
    NOTE: The maturation medium in a volume of 10 mL must be incubated at standard conditions (in a maximum humidified atmosphere at 39 °C in 5% CO2 in air) for at least 4 h before use.
  4. Prepare the base medium (BM) for manipulation of oocyte after in vitro maturation, consisting in PBS without Ca++ and Mg++, supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum (FCS).

2. Oocyte collection and maturation

  1. Recover the oocytes from juvenile (30-40 days of age, body weight 6-10 kg) and adult ovaries.
  2. Transport the collected ovaries from the commercial slaughterhouse to the laboratory within 1-2 h in PBS at 27 °C.
  3. After washing in PBS fresh medium, slice the ovaries in CM using a micro-blade to release the follicle content.
  4. Under a stereomicroscope examination with 60x magnification, select cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) for in vitro maturation by choosing those with 4-10 layers of granulosa cells, oocyte with a uniform cytoplasm, homogeneous distribution of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm and with the outer diameter of about 90 µm (mean).
  5. Wash the selected COCs three times in CM and finally transfer them in maturation medium.
    NOTE: For juvenile oocytes, to improve survival after vitrification, supplement the maturation medium with 100 µM trehalose.
  6. For in vitro maturation, transfer 30-35 COCs in 600 µL of maturation medium in four-well Petri dishes, covered with 300 µL of mineral oil and incubate them for 22 (adult oocytes)/24 (juvenile oocytes) h in 5% CO2 in air at 39 °C.
  7. After in vitro maturation, denude COCs of cumulus cells by gently pipetting. Following the examination under a stereomicroscope with 60x magnification, select only those showing the extrusion on the first polar body, and thus at metaphase II (MII) stage, for vitrification.

3. Semen collection, freezing and thawing procedures

  1. Prepare the base medium for semen cryopreservation consisting in ram extender (200 mM Tris; 70 mM citric acid; 55 mM fructose; pH 7.2, osmolality 300 mOsm/kg) supplemented with egg yolk 20% (v/v).
  2. Collect the semen only during sheep breeding season (October-November).
  3. Obtain ejaculates by artificial vagina from adult rams (aged 2-5 years), maintained in an outdoor environment and fed a live-weight maintenance ration. Keep rams isolated in separate pens, but with visual contact between each other.
  4. Repeat semen collection one a week during the entire breeding season to obtain at least 8 ejaculates from each male.
  5. Transport the semen samples to the laboratory at environmental temperature within 5 min after collection and immediately process. Pool the ejaculates of two-three rams and evaluate sperm concentration spectrophotometry.
  6. After pooling, dilute the ejaculates up to 400 x 106 spermatozoa/mL with base medium for semen cryopreservation supplemented with 4% glycerol. Then cool the diluted semen to 4 °C over a period of 2 h and equilibrate it for 20 min before freezing.
  7. Freeze the semen samples in pellet form (0.25 mL) on dry ice and then plunge them into liquid nitrogen.
  8. For thawing, put the pellet in a sterilized glass falcon and plunge it in a water bath for 20 s at 39 °C.

4. In vitro fertilization and embryo culture

  1. Prepare stocks for constitution of the synthetical oviductal fluid (SOF).
    1. Prepare Stock A: 99.4 mL of MilliQ-water; 6.29 g of NaCl; 0.534 g of KCl; 0.161 g of KH2PO4; 0.182 g of MgSO4 ·7H2O; and 0.6 mL of Sodium Lactate. Keep at 4 °C for up to 3 months.
    2. Prepare Stock B: 10 mL of MilliQ-water; 0.210 g of NaHCO3; and 2-3 g of Phenol Red. Keep at 4 °C for 1 month.
    3. Prepare Stock C: 10 mL of MilliQ-water; and 0.051 g of sodium pyruvate. Keep at 4 °C for 1 month.
    4. Prepare Stock D: 10 mL of MilliQ-water; and 0.262 g of CaCl2 2H2O. Keep at 4 °C for 1 month.
    5. Prepare 10 mL of SOF consisting of 7.630 mL of MilliQ water, 1 mL of Stock A, 1 mL of Stock B, 0.07 mL of Stock C and 0.7 mL of stock D.
    6. Prepare in vitro fertilization (IVF) medium: SOF supplemented with 2% heat-treated estrous sheep serum, 10 µg/mL heparin and 1 µg/mL hypoutarine (osmolality 280-290 mOsm/kg).
      NOTE: The IVF medium in a volume of 10 mL must be incubated at standard conditions (in a maximum humidified atmosphere at 39 °C in 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2) at least 4 h before use.
  2. Transfer frozen/thawed semen aliquots in a sterilized glass conical tube below 1.5 mL of warmed IVF medium and incubate them for 15 min at 39 °C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2 in air.
  3. After incubation, the motile spermatozoa swim towards the apical portion of the liquid column. Collect the top layer and observe for sperm motility evaluation.
    NOTE: Sperm motility parameters should be assessed using a computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system with the following settings: 25 frames acquired to avoid sperm track overlapping, minimum contrast 10, minimum velocity of average path 30 µm/s, and progressive motility > 80% straightness. This system has a specific setup for ram sperm evaluation. For each sample, 5 µL subsample of sperm suspension are loaded into a pre-warmed analysis chamber with a depth of 10 µm. Sperm motility is assessed at 37 °C at 40x using a phase contrast microscope and a minimum of 500 sperm per subsample should be analyzed in at least four different microscopic fields. The percentage of total motile and progressive motile sperm were evaluated. For the IVF, the percentage of progressive motile spermatozoa should be ≥ 30%.
  4. Dilute swim-up derived motile spermatozoa at 1 x 106 spermatozoa/mL final concentration and co-incubate them with MII oocytes in 300 µL of IVF medium covered with mineral oil in four-well Petri dishes.
  5. After 22 h transfer the presumptive zygotes in four-well Petri dishes containing SOF supplemented with 0.4% bovine serum albumin and essential and non-essential amino acids at oviductal concentration as reported by16 under mineral oil and culture them under standard conditions up to the blastocyst stage.
  6. At 22-, 26- and 32- h post-insemination, record the number of cleaved oocytes, showing two distinct blastomeres, by the examination under a stereomicroscope with 60x magnification.
  7. Observe the embryos daily starting from the fifth to the ninth day of culture and newly formed blastocysts should be recorded by the examination under a stereomicroscope with 60x magnification.

5. Oocyte vitrification and warming

NOTE: Perform vitrification following the method of minimum essential volume (MEV) using device cryotops17.

  1. Equilibrate a group of five oocytes at 38.5 °C for 2 min in BM. The use of BM guarantees a low calcium concentration ([Ca2++] 2.2 mg/dL)10.
  2. Dehydrate the oocytes with a 3 min exposure to equilibration solution containing 7.5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 7.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol (EG) in BM.
  3. Transfer the oocytes to the vitrification solution containing 16.5% (v/v) DMSO, 16.5% (v/v) EG and 0.5 M trehalose in BM before loading them in a cryotop device and directly plunging them into liquid nitrogen within 30 s.
  4. To warm to a biological temperature, transfer the content of each vitrification device from liquid nitrogen into 200 µL drops of 1.25 M trehalose in BM for 1 min at 38.5 °C, and gently stir to facilitate the mixing.
  5. To promote removal of intracellular cryoprotectants, transfer oocytes stepwise into 200 µL drops of decreasing trehalose solutions (0.5 M, 0.25 M, 0.125 M trehalose in BM) for 30 s at 38.5 °C before being equilibrated for 10 min at 38.5 °C in BM.

6. Assessment of oocyte quality post-warming

  1. After warming, incubate the oocytes for 6 h in PBS without Ca++ and Mg++ plus 20% FCS (BM) in 5% CO2 in air at 38.5 °C.
    NOTE: The oocyte ability to restore biological and structural features after vitrification is in relation to the species and classes of used oocytes.
  2. Since the oocyte ability to recover cryopreservation damages is time-dependant, assess oocyte quality at different time points of in vitro culture (0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h) after warming, to define the optimal time window for oocyte fertilization.
    ​NOTE: In adult sheep oocyte, the optimal time is 4 h post-warming; for prepubertal oocyte, the optimal time is 2 h post-warming.

7. Oocyte survival assessment

  1. Immediately after warming and for each time point of post-warming culture, morphologically evaluate oocytes using an inverted microscope with 100x magnification.
    NOTE: Oocytes with structural alterations, such as faint cytoplasm, damage zona pellucida and/or membrane should be classified as degenerated.
  2. Validate the membrane integrity evaluation using a double differential fluorescent staining.
  3. Incubate the oocytes in 2 mL of BM containing propidium iodide (PI; 10 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL) for 5 min in 5% CO2 in air at 38.5 °C.
  4. After washing three times in fresh BM, observe the oocytes under a fluorescent microscope using an excitation filter of 350 nm and emission of 460 nm for Hoechst 33342 and an excitation filter of 535 nm and emission of 617 nm for PI.
    ​NOTE: Oocytes with an intact membrane can be recognized by the blue fluorescence of colored DNA with Hoechst 33342. Oocyte with damaged membranes show a red fluorescence due to DNA staining with PI.

8. Evaluation of mitochondrial activity and ROS intracellular levels by confocal laser scanning microscopy

  1. Prepare the MitoTracker Red CM-H2XRos (MT-Red) probe.
    1. Dilute the content of 1 vial (50 µg) with 1 mL of DMSO to obtain a 1 mM solution. Keep the diluted vial in liquid nitrogen.
    2. Dilute the solution 1 mM with DMSO to obtain the 100 µM stock solution and store it at -80 °C in the dark.
  2. Prepare 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) probe.
    1. Dilute the H2DCF-DA in 0.1% polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVA)/PBS to obtain the first 100 mM solution. Keep the solution at -80 °C in the dark .
    2. Dilute the first solution in 0.1% PVA/PBS to obtain the 100 µM stock solution. Store it at -20 °C in the dark.
  3. Prepare the mounting medium (MM): for 10 mL of MM, add 5 mL of glycerol, 5 mL of PBS and 250 mg of sodium azide. Store it at -20 °C until use.
  4. Incubate the oocytes for 30 min at 38.5 °C in BM with 500 nM MT-Red (stock solution: 100 µM in DMSO).
  5. After incubation with MT-Red probe, wash the oocytes three times in BM and incubate for 20 min in the same media containing 5 µM H2DCF-DA (stock solution: 100 µM in BM).
  6. After exposure to the probes, wash the oocytes in BM and fix in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/PBS for at least 15 min.
  7. After fixation, wash the oocytes three times in BM and mount on glass slides in a 4 µL drop of MM with 1 mg/mL Hoechst 33342 using wax cushions to avoid compression of samples.
  8. Store slides at 4 °C in the dark until evaluation.
  9. Perform the analysis of immunolabelled sections with a confocal laser scanning microscope. The microscope is equipped with Ar/He/Ne lasers, using a 40/60x oil objective. Analyze the sections by sequential excitation.
  10. For mitochondrial evaluation, observe the samples with a multiphoton laser to detect MT-Red (exposure: 579 nm; emission: 599 nm).
  11. Use an argon ions laser ray at 488 nm and the B-2 A filter (495 nm exposure and 519 nm emission) to point out the dichlorofluorescein (DCF)18.
  12. In each individual oocyte, measure MT-Red and DCF fluorescence intensities at the equatorial plane19.
  13. Maintain parameters related to fluorescence intensity at constant values during all image acquisitions (laser energy 26%, Sequential Settings 1: PMT1 gain 649-PMT2 gain 482; Sequential Setting 2: PMT1 gain 625-PMT2 gain 589; offset 0; pinhole size: 68).
  14. Perform quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity using the Leica LAS AF Lite image analysis software package, following the procedures standardized by20.
  15. Capture the pictures once, moving on the Z axis, until reaching the equatorial plane.
  16. For each photo, transform to gray scale and turn off channel 1 (related to Hoechst blue) was turned off. Then manually draw a region of interest (ROI) on a circumscribed area, that is around the meiotic spindle.
    NOTE: The software can automatically read the pixel average value on the channel 2 (FITC), subtracting the value of the background from it.
  17. Record the mean values of pixels and submit for statistical analysis.

9. Statistical Analyses

  1. Analyze the following differences: survival rates in juvenile vs adult oocytes, survival rates and developmental competence in control and trehalose-treated juvenile oocytes, survival and parthenogenetic activation rates and developmental competence of adult oocytes vitrified with different calcium concentration media, fertilization rates and embryo production in juvenile oocytes vitrified with low or high calcium concentration, active mitochondria phenotypes in juvenile vitrified oocytes during different time points of post-warming culture and parthenogenetic activation rates between adult and juvenile vitrified oocytes using the chi square test.
  2. Analyze the cleavage rate and embryo output in vitrified adult oocytes during different time points of post-warming culture, fluorescence intensity of mitochondrial activity and ROS intracellular levels in juvenile vitrified oocytes during different time points of post-warming culture by ANOVA after analysis for homogeneity of variance by Levene's test. Use a post-hoc test Tukey's test to highlight differences between and among groups.
  3. Perform statistical analysis using the statistical software program and consider a probability of P < 0.05 to be the minimum level of significance. All results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The cryotolerance of oocyte from juvenile donors is lower compared to adult ones. The first effect observed is a lower post-warming survival rate compared to adult oocytes (Figure 1A; χ2 test P<0.001). Juvenile oocytes showed a lower membrane integrity after warming (Figure 1B). The use of trehalose in the maturation medium was intended to verify whether this sugar could reduce cryoinjuries in juvenile oocytes. The data have demonstrated23 that oocytes matured for 24 h with trehalose supplementation showed higher survival rates after vitrification/warming compared to the non-treated group (Table 1: 85.7% vs 75.3% respectively; χ2 test P<0.05). Trehalose supplementation was indeed associated with higher membrane integrity after warming (Figure 2A). Thus, the use of trehalose during the in vitro maturation of juvenile oocytes increased the rates of survival after vitrification (85.7%) to values comparable to adult ones (90.3%). However, cleavage, fertilization and developmental rates of juvenile oocytes were not increased by trehalose supplementation (Table 1).

To improve oocyte competence after vitrification we tested in adult ovine oocytes different vitrification media with calcium concentrations ranging from 9.9 to 0.4 mg/dL10. Obtained results showed that the use of media with calcium concentration equal to 2.2 mg/dL increased post-warming survival rates, improved developmental competence and reduced parthenogenetic activation of adult oocyte10 (Table 2). We thus tested the low calcium vitrification media for the vitrification of juvenile oocytes. As shown in Table 3, juvenile oocytes vitrified with low calcium concentration evidenced higher fertilization rates compared to oocytes vitrified with high calcium concentration (44.35% vs 32.29 % respectively; P<0.05), but no differences were found in embryo production.

Vitrified/warmed oocytes need extra time prior to fertilization to restore damage due to cryopreservation procedures and to increase their developmental potential. A previous study has indeed demonstrated that ATP intracellular concentration, mitochondrial activity and in vitro developmental competence are reduced in vitrified/thawed oocytes, which also show high intracellular ROS concentrations6. These alterations are particularly marked immediately after warming. During the post-warming culture, both adult and juvenile oocytes are able to partially recover from the damages suffered during the vitrification procedures6, 24. By comparing post-warming culture of different durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), we showed that after 4 h of culture oocytes collected from adult ewes are able to recover the energetic balance6 and microtubular setup24 and to restore the developmental competence with higher cleavage (50.7 ± 3.9%; P< 0.01 ANOVA) and blastocyst rates (14.40 ± 1.3%; ANOVA P< 0.01) compared to other time points (0, 2 and 6 h; Table 4). Thus, 4 h of post-warming culture represents the ideal time window for fertilization of vitrified/warmed adult oocytes6.

When the same experiment was repeated with oocytes collected from juvenile donors, these results were partially confirmed. Mitochondrial activity was higher in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes after 4 h of post-warming culture compared to other time points (0, 2, 6; Figure 3: ANOVA P<0.01). Several patterns of mitochondrial distribution are observed and classified into the following three groups (as reported by21 ): Pattern A: homogeneous FINE with small granulations spread throughout the cytoplasm; Pattern B: homogeneous GRANULAR with large granulations spread throughout the cytoplasm; Pattern C: heterogeneous CLUSTERED when particularly large granulations were present, spread all over the cytoplasm or located in specific cytoplasmic domains. The different phenotypes in the cytoplasm distribution of active mitochondrial in MII can be related to oocyte developmental competence. A FINE homogeneous distribution is an indicator of poor developmental competence while a GRANULAR and CLUSTERED distribution are related to an increased mitochondria activity and consequently higher developmental competence22. Mitochondrial distribution patterns changed during 6 h of post-warming culture. Figure 4 shows examples of juvenile oocytes having different patterns of mitochondrial distribution and their fluctuations during post-warming culture. The pattern A increase significantly during the prolonged incubation and reaches the higher value at 6 h post-warming (Figure 4Aa: χ2 P<0.05), the pattern B did not show significant changes during post-warming culture (Figure 4Bb), the pattern C was not found in any juvenile vitrified/warmed oocyte during the prolonged incubation (Figure 4Cc: χ2 P<0.05).

Moreover, ROS intracellular levels were significantly lower in juvenile oocytes at 2 h of post-warming culture compared to 0, 4 and 6 h (Figure 5: ANOVA P<0.001). However, and in contrast to what was found in adult oocytes, the rate of spontaneous parthenogenetic activation increased during the post-warming culture in juvenile oocytes (Figure 6). For this reason, the recommended time point for fertilization in juvenile oocytes would be 2 h after the post warming culture.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Survival rates of vitrified/warmed ovine oocyte collected from juvenile and adult donors. (A) Oocyte were vitrified after in vitro maturation. Survival rates were determined after vitrification and warming by fluorescent staining with propidium iodide (10 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL). N = 165 adult oocytes and 170 juvenile oocytes. Different letters indicate significant differences between adult and juvenile oocytes: χ2 test P<0.001. (B-C) Examples of vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes with intact (B) and damaged plasma membrane (C) at the morphological evaluation (inverted microscope with 100x magnification). Scale bar = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Juvenile ovine oocyte survival rates and in vitro developmental competence after maturation with (TRH) and without (CTR) trehalose (100 mM in maturation medium). (A-B) Examples of juvenile oocytes vitrified after in vitro maturation in media supplemented (A) with or (B) without trehalose at the morphological evaluation (inverted microscope with 100x magnification). Scale bar = 30 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantification of active mitochondrial fluorescence intensity in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes at different time points (0, 2, 4, 6) during post-warming in vitro culture. IVM oocytes were used as a control (CTR N = 77). In total 163 (0 h N = 45; 2 h N = 39; 4 h N = 40; 6 h N = 39) juvenile oocytes were vitrified and warmed in three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA P = 0.0000). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Distribution of mitochondrial pattern in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes during 6 hours of post-warming in vitro culture. Representative images of Fine (A), Granular (B) and Clustered (C) mitochondrial distribution in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes. (D) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a fine mitochondrial distribution; (E) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a granular mitochondrial distribution; (F) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a clustered mitochondrial distribution. IVM juvenile oocytes were used as control (CTR; N = 77). In total 163 (0 h N = 45; 2 h N = 39; 4 h N = 40; 6 h N = 39) juvenile oocytes vitrified and warmed in three independent experiments were used. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (Aa: χ2 P = 0.026; Bb: χ2 P = 0.097; Cc: χ2 P = 0.014). Scale bar = 30 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Quantification of intracellular ROS fluorescence intensity in vitrified juvenile oocytes during of 6 hours post-warming in vitro culture. (A-B) Representative images of ROS fluorescence intensity in in vitro matured (A) and vitrified (B) juvenile oocytes. (C) Intracellular levels of ROS as determined by quantification of fluorescence intensity in vitrified juvenile oocytes at different time points (0 h N=45; 2 h N=39; 4 h N=40; 6 h N=39) during post-warming in vitro culture. In vitro matured juvenile oocytes were used as a control (CTR N = 77). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA P = 0.0000). Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Parthenogenetic activation in vitrified juvenile and adult oocytes during 6 hours of post-warming in vitro culture. (A-B) Representative images of oocyte parthenogenetic activation: (A) oocyte in metaphase II-telophase II transition and (B) pronucleus formation. (C) Percentages of parthenogenetic activated adult and juvenile oocytes at different time points (0, 2, 4, 6 h) during post-warming in vitro culture. Asterisks indicate statistical differences between juvenile and adult oocytes at each time point of incubation (ANOVA P = 0.000). This figure has been modified from Serra et al.24 Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Oocytes (n) Survival rate (%) IVF (n) Fertilizeda (%) Cleavedb (%) Blastocystsc (%)
CTR 73 75.3* 452 91.1 96.1 14.3
TRH 77 85.7 470 92.5 95.4 13
* Chi square test p<0.5
a Percentages are calculated on IVF oocytes
b Percentages are calculated on fertilized oocytes
c Percentages are calculated on cleaved oocytes

Table 1. Juvenile ovine oocytes survival rates and in vitro developmental competence after maturation with and without trehalose and vitrification. TRH = juvenile oocytes matured with trehalose supplementation (100 mM in maturation medium). CTR = control juvenile oocytes matured without trehalose supplementation. Survival rates were determined after fluorescent staining with propidium iodide (10 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL) of vitrified/warmed oocytes. Oocyte developmental competence was determined after incorporation in an in vitro production system. a Percentages are calculated on IVF oocytes. b Percentages are calculated on fertilized oocytes. c Percentages are calculated on cleaved oocytes. * χ2 test P<0.5. This table has been modified from Berlinguer et al.23

Groups [Ca++] mg/dL N oocyte Spontaneous parthenogenetic activation (%) Vitrified oocytes Survived and IVF oocytes (%) Cleavage (%) Blastocysts output (%)
TCM/FCS 9.9 80 33 (41.2)a 150 124 (82.7)a 40 (32.5)a 2 (1.6)a
PBS/FCS 4.4 82 29 (35.3)ac 115 88 (76.5)a 33 (37.5)ae 1 (1.1)a
PBSCaMg free/FCS 2.2 86 11 (12.7)b 126 115 (91.3)b 74 (64.3)b 12 (10.4)b
PBS/BSA 3.2 83 21 (25.3)c 110 90 (81.8)a 18 (20)c 0 (0)a
PBSCaMg free/BSA 0.4 87 10 (11.5)b 149 123 (82.5)a 57 (46.3)de 3 (2.4)b

Table 2. Developmental competence of in vitro matured adult oocytes vitrified in vitrification media (16.5% ethylene glycol + 16.5% dimethyl sulfoxide) containing different calcium concentrations. Survival and fertilization rates are calculated on vitrified oocytes; total cleavage and blastocyst rates are calculated on survived oocytes. Values with different subscript within the same column are significantly different: χ2 test P<0.05. This table has been modified from Succu et al.10

[Ca 2++] in vitrification media No. Oocytes Post-vitrification survival rate (%) Fertilization rate (%) Cleavage (%) Blastocyst output (%)
High [9.9 mg/dL] 190 161 (84.73) 52/161 (32.29)a 43/161 (26.7) 0
Low [2.2 mg/dL] 150 124 (82.66) 55/124 (44.35)b 41/124 (33.1) 0

Table 3. Fertilization and developmental rates after in vitro fertilization and culture of vitrified/warmed juvenile oocyte using high ([Ca 2++] = 9.9 mg/dL) and low ([Ca 2++] = 2.2 mg/dL) calcium concentration in vitrification media. Different letters indicate statistical difference (a ≠ b P<0.05 χ2 test).

Hours of post-warming incubation Cleavage rate (n) Embryo output (n)
0 19.2 ± 3%a (82) 0%a (17)
2 41.8 ± 3%b (100) 6.5 ± 1.3%b (42)
4 50.7 ± 3%b (92) 14.4 ± 1.3%c (48)
6 26 ± 3%a (92) 0%a (23)

Table 4. Cleavage rate and embryo output in vitrified/warmed adult oocytes fertilized at different time points of post-warming culture. Different letters indicate statistical difference within the same column: ANOVA P<0.01.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Oocyte cryopreservation in domestic animals can allow not only the long-term conservation of female genetic resources, but also advance the development of embryonic biotechnologies. Thus, the development of a standard method for oocyte vitrification would advantage both the livestock and the research sector. In this protocol, a complete method for adult sheep oocyte vitrification is presented and could represent a solid starting point for the development of an efficient vitrification system for juvenile oocyte.

One of the main advantages of the proposed method is that it includes all the steps from oocyte collection, in vitro maturation, vitrification, and warming. Moreover, it includes a post-warming culture period to allow oocytes to recover from the damages incurred during the vitrification procedure before being fertilized. The optimum time for fertilization should be tailored according to the method of cryopreservation, initial oocyte quality, patient age, and species, being essential to consider both aspects of time recovery and oocyte aging25,26. Thus, choosing the duration of the post-warming incubation period is challenging and it may impact the outcome of oocyte vitrification programs. Based on the results obtained in terms of cleavage rates and embryo output, and under the conditions described in the presented protocol, the optimum time for fertilization of vitrified adult sheep oocytes is after 4 hours of post-warming incubation (Table 4)6. This information is crucial when designing an oocyte vitrification program.

This protocol, however, while giving acceptable results in terms of embryo output from vitrified/warmed adult oocytes, still leads to low to zero embryos if applied to juvenile oocytes. Several structural and functional limitations impair prepubertal oocyte developmental competence, such as small size, defective coupling between cumulus cells and oocytes, decrease in amino acid uptake, reduced protein synthesis and energy metabolism 27,28,29. In a previous study we reported that prepubertal oocytes show high sensitivity to the vitrification procedure30. The low developmental competence shown after vitrification and warming is probably the result of damages to cytoplasmic factors involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton and (or) in the activation of maturation promoting factor30. As shown in Table 1, the supplementation of the maturation medium with trehalose, a non-permeable cryoprotectant, was able to increase survival rates after vitrification and warming to values comparable to those of adult oocytes4. In the same way, the use of vitrification solution with low calcium concentrations increases fertilization rates of juvenile oocytes after vitrification and warming, as shown in Table 3. Thus, both the optimization on culture conditions during in vitro maturation and of the vitrification media composition may help in increasing the quality of the juvenile oocyte after vitrification and warming. Juvenile oocytes show some ability to recover from the damages induced by the vitrification procedure, as shown in Figure 3, 4 and 5.

However, the high rates of spontaneous parthenogenetic activation during post-warming culture still limit their developmental potential. Ethylene glycol and DMSO, which are commonly used cryoprotective agents, may artificially activate the oocyte before the actual fertilization, thereby limiting fertilization success and embryo development. They can indeed cause a transient increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration31, thus triggering cortical granule exocytosis, pronuclei formation, and meiotic resumption32. In fact, vitrification may artificially activate the oocyte before the actual fertilization, thereby limiting fertilization success and embryo development. Calcium chelator may thus be used to further limit calcium availability during the vitrification process with the aim of limiting the rate of spontaneous activation in juvenile oocytes.

It should also be considered that, unlike slow-freezing, vitrification is an exclusively manual technique and it is thus operator dependent33,34. Thus, the availability of trained personnel is a key factor for the success of this method. First of all, the operator has to properly select the oocytes to be vitrified. After IVM, oocytes are gently denuded of cumulus cells and evaluated under a stereomicroscope to select for cryopreservation only those with a uniform cytoplasm, homogeneous distribution of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm and with the outer diameter of about 90 µm. Moreover, only oocytes showing the extrusion on the first polar body, and thus at the MII stage, must be selected.

The morphological evaluation of the oocytes must be completed in a few minutes and being operator-dependant, it is very sensitive to variations in its proper implementation. To help standardize the selection procedure, the method suggests limiting the culture time for in vitro maturation to 22 h for adult oocytes. At this time point, sheep oocytes of high quality have already completed the first meiotic division22 and can be selected for cryopreservation. This way the elimination of low-quality oocytes, which are the slowest ones in the completion of the first meiotic division, should be simpler.

The operator must also strictly respect the timing set for the vitrification procedure, from the first exposure to the cryoprotectant to the immersion in liquid nitrogen. Another critical step is the loading of the oocyte in the vitrification device used. The procedure must use minimum sample volumes to increase the cooling rate and to help cells pass through the phase transition temperature rapidly, thereby decreasing cryoinjuries35. Cryotop uses a polypropylene strip attached to a holder. In this method, the oocytes in the vitrification solution (<0.1 µL) are rapidly loaded with a glass capillary on top of the film strip. Then, the solution must be removed, leaving behind a thin layer sufficient to cover the cells to be cryopreserved. Once again, this step must be completed as fast as possible to limit the exposure of the oocytes to the high cryoprotectant concentrations of the vitrification solution, which can cause osmotic shock and are toxic to the cells.

For these reasons, a major challenge associated with this method is the need for manual handling and skilled technician. Other authors reported that the oocyte vitrification outcome appears influenced by a "learning curve" effect, as the acquisition of manual skills can significantly reduce the biological damage induce by the vitrification procedure34. Researchers should thus take into consideration the "operator effect" in the evaluation of the outcome of the vitrification procedure.

Further studies will focus both on standardizing the oocyte selection procedure and better tailoring media composition and culture conditions to the needs of the juvenile oocytes. At this regard, both the use of calcium chelator and antioxidants may offer promising opportunities. Similarly, the optimization of the protocol will allow increasing the developmental competence of vitrified/warmed adult oocytes.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors received no specific funding for this work. Professor Maria Grazia Cappai and Dr. Valeria Pasciu are gratefully acknowledged for the video voiceover and for setting up the lab during the video making.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate Sigma-Aldrich D-6883
Albumin bovine fraction V, protease free Sigma-Aldrich A3059
Bisbenzimide H 33342 trihydrochloride (Hoechst 33342) Sigma-Aldrich 14533
Calcium chloride (CaCl2 2H20) Sigma-Aldrich C8106
Citric acid Sigma-Aldrich C2404
Confocal laser scanning microscope Leica Microsystems GmbH,Wetzlar TCS SP5 DMI 6000CS
Cryotop Kitazato Medical Biological Technologies
Cysteamine Sigma-Aldrich M9768
D- (-) Fructose Sigma-Aldrich F0127
D(+)Trehalose dehydrate Sigma-Aldrich T0167
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) Sigma-Aldrich D2438
Dulbecco Phosphate Buffered Saline Sigma-Aldrich D8537
Egg yolk Sigma-Aldrich P3556
Ethylene glycol (EG) Sigma-Aldrich 324558
FSH Sigma-Aldrich F4021
Glutamic Acid Sigma-Aldrich G5638
Glutaraldehyde Sigma-Aldrich G5882
Glycerol Sigma-Aldrich G5516
Glycine Sigma-Aldrich G8790
Heparin Sigma-Aldrich H4149
HEPES Sigma-Aldrich H4034
Hypoutarine Sigma-Aldrich H1384
Inverted microscope Diaphot, Nikon
L-Alanine Sigma-Aldrich A3534
L-Arginine Sigma-Aldrich A3784
L-Asparagine Sigma-Aldrich A4284
L-Aspartic Acid Sigma-Aldrich A4534
L-Cysteine Sigma-Aldrich C7352
L-Cystine Sigma-Aldrich C8786
L-Glutamine Sigma-Aldrich G3126
LH Sigma-Aldrich L6420
L-Histidine Sigma-Aldrich H9511
L-Isoleucine Sigma-Aldrich I7383
L-Leucine Sigma-Aldrich L1512
L-Lysine Sigma-Aldrich L1137
L-Methionine Sigma-Aldrich M2893
L-Ornithine Sigma-Aldrich O6503
L-Phenylalanine Sigma-Aldrich P5030
L-Proline Sigma-Aldrich P4655
L-Serine Sigma-Aldrich S5511
L-Tyrosine Sigma-Aldrich T1020
L-Valine Sigma-Aldrich V6504
Magnesium chloride heptahydrate (MgSO4.7H2O) Sigma-Aldrich M2393
Makler Counting Chamber Sefi-Medical Instruments ltd.Biosigma S.r.l.
Medium 199 Sigma-Aldrich M5017
Mineral oil Sigma-Aldrich M8410
MitoTracker Red CM-H2XRos ThermoFisher M7512
New born calf serum heat inactivated (FCS) Sigma-Aldrich N4762
Penicillin G sodium salt Sigma-Aldrich P3032
Phenol Red Sigma-Aldrich P3532
Polyvinyl alcohol (87-90% hydrolyzed, average mol wt 30,000-70,000) Sigma-Aldrich P8136
Potassium Chloride (KCl) Sigma-Aldrich P5405
Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4) Sigma-Aldrich P5655
Propidium iodide Sigma-Aldrich P4170
Sheep serum Sigma-Aldrich S2263
Sodium azide Sigma-Aldrich S2202
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) Sigma-Aldrich S5761
Sodium chloride (NaCl) Sigma-Aldrich S9888
Sodium dl-lactate solution syrup Sigma-Aldrich L4263
Sodium pyruvate Sigma-Aldrich P2256
Sperm Class Analyzer Microptic S.L. S.C.A. v 3.2.0
Statistical software Minitab 18.1 2017 Minitab
Stereo microscope Olimpus SZ61
Streptomycin sulfate Sigma-Aldrich S9137
Taurine Sigma-Aldrich T7146
TRIS Sigma-Aldrich 15,456-3

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Arav, A. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology. 81 (1), 96-102 (2014).
  2. Mullen, S. F., Fahy, G. M. A chronologic review of mature oocyte vitrification research in cattle, pigs, and sheep. Theriogenology. 78 (8), 1709-1719 (2012).
  3. Hwang, I. S., Hochi, S. Recent progress in cryopreservation of bovine oocytes. BioMed Research International. 2014, (2014).
  4. Berlinguer, F., et al. Effects of trehalose co-incubation on in vitro matured prepubertal ovine oocyte vitrification. Cryobiology. 55 (1), (2007).
  5. Quan, G., Wu, G., Hong, Q. Oocyte Cryopreservation Based in Sheep: The Current Status and Future Perspective. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 15 (6), 535-547 (2017).
  6. Succu, S., et al. A recovery time after warming restores mitochondrial function and improves developmental competence of vitrified ovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 110, (2018).
  7. Succu, S., et al. Vitrification of in vitro matured ovine oocytes affects in vitro pre-implantation development and mRNA abundance. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 75 (3), (2008).
  8. Succu, S., et al. Vitrification Devices Affect Structural and Molecular Status of In Vitro Matured Ovine Oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 74, 1337-1344 (2007).
  9. Hosseini, S. M., Asgari, V., Hajian, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. Cytoplasmic, rather than nuclear-DNA, insufficiencies as the major cause of poor competence of vitrified oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. , (2015).
  10. Succu, S., et al. Calcium concentration in vitrification medium affects the developmental competence of in vitro matured ovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 75 (4), (2011).
  11. Sanaei, B., et al. An improved method for vitrification of in vitro matured ovine oocytes; beneficial effects of Ethylene Glycol Tetraacetic acid, an intracellular calcium chelator. Cryobiology. 84, 82-90 (2018).
  12. Quan, G. B., Wu, G. Q., Wang, Y. J., Ma, Y., Lv, C. R., Hong, Q. H. Meiotic maturation and developmental capability of ovine oocytes at germinal vesicle stage following vitrification using different cryodevices. Cryobiology. 72 (1), 33-40 (2016).
  13. Fernández-Reyez, F., et al. maturation and embryo development in vitro of immature porcine and ovine oocytes vitrified in different devices. Cryobiology. 64 (3), 261-266 (2012).
  14. Ahmadi, E., Shirazi, A., Shams-Esfandabadi, N., Nazari, H. Antioxidants and glycine can improve the developmental competence of vitrified/warmed ovine immature oocytes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 54 (3), 595-603 (2019).
  15. Barrera, N., et al. Impact of delipidated estrous sheep serum supplementation on in vitro maturation, cryotolerance and endoplasmic reticulum stress gene expression of sheep oocytes. PLoS ONE. 13 (6), (2018).
  16. Walker, S. K., Hill, J. L., Kleemann, D. O., Nancarrow, C. D. Development of Ovine Embryos in Synthetic Oviductal Fluid Containing Amino Acids at Oviductal Fluid Concentrations. Biology of Reproduction. 55 (3), 703-708 (1996).
  17. Kuwayama, M., Vajta, G., Kato, O., Leibo, S. P. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 11 (3), 300-308 (2005).
  18. Wu, X., Jin, X., Wang, Y., Mei, Q., Li, J., Shi, Z. Synthesis and spectral properties of novel chlorinated pH fluorescent probes. Journal of Luminescence. 131 (4), 776-780 (2011).
  19. Dell'Aquila, M. E., et al. Prooxidant effects of verbascoside, a bioactive compound from olive oil mill wastewater, on in vitro developmental potential of ovine prepubertal oocytes and bioenergetic/oxidative stress parameters of fresh and vitrified oocytes. BioMed Research International. 2014, (2014).
  20. Gadau, S. D. Morphological and quantitative analysis on α-tubulin modifications in glioblastoma cells. Neuroscience Letters. 687, 111-118 (2018).
  21. los Reyes, M. D., Palomino, J., Parraguez, V. H., Hidalgo, M., Saffie, P. Mitochondrial distribution and meiotic progression in canine oocytes during in vivo and in vitro maturation. Theriogenology. , (2011).
  22. Leoni, G. G., et al. Differences in the kinetic of the first meiotic division and in active mitochondrial distribution between prepubertal and adult oocytes mirror differences in their developmental competence in a sheep model. PLoS ONE. 10 (4), (2015).
  23. Berlinguer, F., et al. Effects of trehalose co-incubation on in vitro matured prepubertal ovine oocyte vitrification. Cryobiology. 55 (1), 27-34 (2007).
  24. Serra, E., Gadau, S. D., Berlinguer, F., Naitana, S., Succu, S. Morphological features and microtubular changes in vitrified ovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 148, 216-224 (2020).
  25. Asgari, V., Hosseini, S. M., Ostadhosseini, S., Hajian, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. Time dependent effect of post warming interval on microtubule organization, meiotic status, and parthenogenetic activation of vitrified in vitro matured sheep oocytes. Theriogenology. 75 (5), 904-910 (2011).
  26. Ciotti, P. M., et al. Meiotic spindle recovery is faster in vitrification of human oocytes compared to slow freezing. Fertility and Sterility. 91 (6), 2399-2407 (2009).
  27. Ledda, S., Bogliolo, L., Leoni, G., Naitana, S. Cell Coupling and Maturation-Promoting Factor Activity in In Vitro-Matured Prepubertal and Adult Sheep Oocytes1. Biology of Reproduction. 65 (1), 247-252 (2001).
  28. Palmerini, M. G., et al. In vitro maturation is slowed in prepubertal lamb oocytes: ultrastructural evidences. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 12, (2014).
  29. Leoni, G. G., et al. Relations between relative mRNA abundance and developmental competence of ovine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 74 (2), 249-257 (2007).
  30. Succu, S., et al. Effect of vitrification solutions and cooling upon in vitro matured prepubertal ovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 68 (1), 107-114 (2007).
  31. Larman, M. G., Sheehan, C. B., Gardner, D. K. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 131 (1), 53-61 (2006).
  32. Yeste, M., Jones, C., Amdani, S. N., Patel, S., Coward, K. Oocyte activation deficiency: a role for an oocyte contribution. Human Reproduction Update. 22 (1), 23-47 (2016).
  33. Rienzi, L., et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Human Reproduction Update. 23 (2), 139-155 (2017).
  34. De Santis, L., et al. Oocyte vitrification: influence of operator and learning time on survival and development parameters. Placenta. 32, 280-281 (2011).
  35. Zhang, X., Catalano, P. N., Gurkan, U. A., Khimji, I., Demirci, U. Emerging technologies in medical applications of minimum volume vitrification. Nanomedicine. 6 (6), London, England. 1115-1129 (2011).

Tags

Vitrification In Vitro Matured Oocytes Adult Ovaries Prepubertal Ovaries Sheep Oocyte Preservation Genetic Selection Programs Biodiversity Conservation Biotechnology Research Ultrarapid Cooling Warming Cattle Oocyte Preservation Vitrification Protocol In Vitro Maturation Cryopreservation Trehalose Supplementation Denudation Of Cumulus Cells
Vitrification of In Vitro Matured Oocytes Collected from Adult and Prepubertal Ovaries in Sheep
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Succu, S., Serra, E., Gadau, S.,More

Succu, S., Serra, E., Gadau, S., Varcasia, A., Berlinguer, F. Vitrification of In Vitro Matured Oocytes Collected from Adult and Prepubertal Ovaries in Sheep. J. Vis. Exp. (173), e62272, doi:10.3791/62272 (2021).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter