$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Systemic candidiasis is the fourth major cause of nosocomial infections, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Globally, systemic candidiasis affects approximately 700,000 individuals1. Candida species, namely C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and C. auris, are the most common cause of invasive Candida infections2. Candida species are opportunistic pathogens that produce biofilms3. Biofilms are predominantly associated with Candida virulence, and Candida can withstand oxidative and osmotic stress conditions by inducing biofilm formation4. Biofilms further modulate the expression of virulence factors and cell wall components and form an exopolymeric protective matrix, helping Candida to adapt to different host niches4. Biofilms contribute to yeast adherence on host tissues and medical instruments5. As such, biofilm formation is associated with an advantage to yeasts, as yeast cells within the biofilms can evade the host immune response6. Biofilm formation also protects the pathogenic yeasts from the action of antifungal drugs5. Decreased susceptibility of C. albicans biofilms to amphotericin B has been demonstrated by Pierce et al.7,8. Furthermore, biofilms demonstrate antifungal drug resistance to fluconazole, which impairs effective management of systemic candidiasis9,10.
Microbes have an intrinsic tendency to adhere to various biotic and abiotic surfaces, which results in biofilm formation. Candida albicans, which is a dimorphic fungus, exists in yeast and hyphal forms, and its biofilm formation has been characterized in various in vitro and in vivo model systems11. The steps of biofilm formation include the adhesion of Candida cells to the substrate, filamentation, proliferation, and biofilm maturation11. Initially, the yeast form of C. albicans adheres to substrates, including medical devices and human tissue, followed by filamentation and proliferation of C. albicans into hyphal and pseudohyphal forms, and finally maturation of biofilms embedded in extracellular matrix11. Biofilm formation largely contributes to C. albicans pathogenesis mechanisms12. Candida species form drug-resistant biofilms, which makes their eradication challenging13. A small subset of the C. albicans biofilm-producing population has been described as being highly resistant to the antifungal drugs amphotericin B and chlorhexidine14. Of note, yeast cells in biofilms exhibit high resistance to multidrug therapy compared to yeast cells in the planktonic phase and proliferation phase14. It has been suggested that yeast cells existing in biofilms are highly tolerant to antifungal drugs, which contributes to C. albicans survival in biofilms14. These existing cells were reported to be phenotypic variants of C. albicans and not mutants14. Furthermore, cells of Candida biofilms known as "persister cells" are tolerant to high doses of amphotericin-B treatment and contribute to Candida survival, thereby posing a great burden of recurring systemic Candida infections in high-risk individuals15.
The increase in antifungal drug resistance in Candida strains necessitates research for new antifungal agents and immunotherapies. As evident from the abovementioned studies, Candida biofilms show decreased susceptibility to antifungal drugs. Therefore, there is a need for improved immunotherapies to control Candida biofilm formation. Earlier studies have shown that CAGTA can provide effective protection against systemic Candida infections by inhibiting C. albicans biofilm formation in vitro16. Another study reported that immunization of mice with C. albicans rAls3-N protein induces high antibody titers that interfere with C. albicans biofilm formation in vitro17. Anti-Als3-N antibodies also exerted an inhibitory effect on C. albicans dispersal from biofilms17. NDV-3A vaccine based on C. albicans is currently under clinical trial and anti-NDV-3A sera were also found to reduce C. auris biofilm formation18. A recent study identified inhibition of biofilm formation by Sap2-antibodies as a protection mechanism in a murine model of systemic candidiasis19.
This paper outlines a detailed in vitro protocol for evaluating the effect of antigen-specific antibodies present in polyclonal serum obtained from different groups of Sap2 vaccinated mice on preformed Candida tropicalis biofilms. To achieve this, a method based on an XTT reduction assay was optimized and developed in the laboratory, which can measure biofilm viability in a fast, sensitive, and high-throughput manner, in the presence or absence of antibodies.
The XTT assay is used to measure cellular metabolic activity as an indicator of cell viability, cellular proliferation, and cytotoxicity20. This colorimetric assay is based on the reduction of a yellow tetrazolium salt, sodium 3´-[1-(phenylaminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis (4-methoxy-6-nitro) benzene sulfonic acid hydrate (XTT) to an orange formazan dye by metabolically active cells. Since only viable cells can reduce XTT, the amount of reduced XTT formazan is proportional to the intensity of color and cell viability. The formazan dye formed is water-soluble and is directly quantified using a plate reader. Due to its water-soluble nature, the XTT assay allows the study of intact biofilms, as well as the examination of biofilm drug susceptibility, without disruption of biofilm structure21. Additionally, this method is implemented in Candida fungal viability assessments due to its ease of use, speed, accuracy, high throughput, and high degree of reproducibility7,22.
In addition to the XTT reduction assay, numerous alternative techniques have also been identified for the measurement of biofilm quantity. Some of these include the use of the MTT reduction assay, crystal violet staining, DNA quantification, quantitative PCR, protein quantification, dry cell weight measurement, and viable colony counting. These procedures vary widely in terms of their time and cost requirements. Taff et al. performed a comparative analysis of seven different Candida biofilm quantitation assays and found that the XTT assay provided the most reproducible, accurate, and efficient method for the quantitative estimation of C. albicans biofilms23. Staining techniques such as crystal violet have certain limitations; the crystal violet test indirectly determines the amount of biofilm by measuring the optical density of the crystal violet-stained biofilm matrix and cells. Although the crystal violet assay provides a good measure of biofilm mass, it does not give a measure of biofilm viability as it stains both microbial cells and the extracellular matrix24. Dhale et al. further reported that the XTT reduction assay was the most sensitive, reproducible, accurate, efficient, and specific method to detect biofilm production as compared to crystal violet assay25. Literature reports have shown that the XTT assay correlates well with the CFU/mL parameter in the CFU counting method. However, compared to the XTT assay, the CFU method is labor-intensive and slow26. Furthermore, the fraction of detached live cells may not be representative of the initial biofilm population27. Although the XTT reduction assay seems the best available option to quantify viability, there are a few limitations of this technique. While the XTT method is useful for comparisons involving one fungal strain, its use may be limited when comparing different fungal strains and species. Interstrain comparisons may be difficult in the absence of detailed standardization since different strains metabolize substrates with different capabilities21.