Nuclear envelope proteins play a central role in many basic biological processes and have been implicated in a variety of human diseases. This protocol describes a new Cre/Lox-based mouse model that allows for the spatiotemporal control of LINC complexes disruption.
Nuclear migration and anchorage within developing and adult tissues relies heavily upon large macromolecular protein assemblies called LInkers of the Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC complexes). These protein scaffolds span the nuclear envelope and connect the interior of the nucleus to components of the surrounding cytoplasmic cytoskeleton. LINC complexes consist of two evolutionary-conserved protein families, Sun proteins and Nesprins that harbor C-terminal molecular signature motifs called the SUN and KASH domains, respectively. Sun proteins are transmembrane proteins of the inner nuclear membrane whose N-terminal nucleoplasmic domain interacts with the nuclear lamina while their C-terminal SUN domains protrudes into the perinuclear space and interacts with the KASH domain of Nesprins. Canonical Nesprin isoforms have a variable sized N-terminus that projects into the cytoplasm and interacts with components of the cytoskeleton. This protocol describes the validation of a dominant-negative transgenic mouse strategy that disrupts endogenous SUN/KASH interactions in a cell-type specific manner. Our approach is based on the Cre/Lox system that bypasses many drawbacks such as perinatal lethality and cell nonautonomous phenotypes that are associated with germline models of LINC complex inactivation. For this reason, this model provides a useful tool to understand the role of LINC complexes during development and homeostasis in a wide array of tissues.
The nuclear envelope (NE) separates the nucleoplasm from the cytoplasm. It is composed of an inner and outer nuclear membrane (INM and ONM, respectively) that connect at nuclear pores. The lumen delineated by both membranes is called the perinuclear space (PNS). The ONM is an extension of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and the INM adheres to the nuclear lamina, a meshwork of nuclear type-V intermediate filaments represented by A- and B-type lamins 1,2. LInkers of the Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes are macromolecular assemblies that span the whole nuclear envelope to physically connect the interior of the nucleus to cytoskeletal filaments and molecular motors (Figure 1A). They consist of interactions between evolutionarily conserved motifs that characterize two families of integral transmembrane proteins of the NE: Sun (Sad1/Unc84) proteins and Nesprins (Nuclear Envelope SPectRINS). In mammals, Sun1 and Sun2 are transmembrane proteins of the INM whose N-terminal nucleoplasmic region interacts directly with A- and B-type lamins 3-5. On the other side of the INM, within the PNS, Sun proteins harbor an evolutionary-conserved stretch of ~150 C-terminal amino acids called the SUN domain. SUN domains interact directly with the evolutionary-conserved KASH (Klarsicht/Anc-1, Syne Homology) domain, the molecular signature of Nesprins. KASH domains consist of a stretch of ~30 C-terminal amino acids that protrudes into the PNS followed by a transmembrane domain 6. At least four distinct Nesprin genes (Nesprin1-4) encode KASH-containing proteins that localize at the NE 7. The cytoplasmic regions of Nesprins, whose sizes vary from ~50kDa (Nesprin4) to an astonishing 1,000 kDa (Nesprin1 giant), contain multiple spectrin repeats as well as specific motifs enabling their interaction with cytoskeletal components such as actin, plectin and molecular motors8-13.
Studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have shown that Lamin/Sun/Nesprin/molecular motors constitute an evolutionarily conserved “axis” controlling nuclear migration and anchorage. Several knock-out (KO) mouse models of LINC complex components have been described and were instrumental in providing a framework to understand the roles of Sun and Nesprin proteins at the NE during mammalian development 9,14,15. However, these models present several significant drawbacks, most notably: 1) difficulty in interpreting phenotypes due to cell non-autonomous effects, 2) difficulty in distinguishing the phenotypical contributions of KASH-containing vs. KASH-less Nesprin isoforms16, 3) the functional redundancy of Sun and Nesprin proteins at the NE in numerous cell types requires complex breeding schemes to inactivate all SUN-KASH interactions in mice 17 and 4) the perinatal lethality of mice deficient for the KASH-domain of both Nesprins1 and 2 precludes the analysis of adult phenotypes 18.
This protocol describes a novel mouse model designed to disrupt all SUN-KASH interactions in vivo, in a cell autonomous and developmentally regulated manner, thus bypassing many of the drawbacks outlined above. This Cre/lox-based mouse model relies on two important concepts: 1) the KASH domain of any known Nesprin protein is sufficient to target EGFP to the NE in cell culture systems and 2) SUN domains interact promiscuously with KASH domains, thus overexpression of any KASH domain will saturate all endogenous SUN domains and inactivate LINC complexes in a dominant-negative manner 17 (Figure 1B). This protocol describes tissue harvesting and processing steps used to confirm the disruption of all SUN-KASH interactions in cerebellar Purkinje cells.
Ethics Statement: Procedures involving animal subjects were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Washington University in St. Louis.
1. Mouse Breeding and Genotyping
2. Preparation of Materials for Dissection and Tissue Collection
3. Dissection and Tissue Collection
4. Tissue Processing and Sectioning
5. Staining and Imaging of Cerebellum Sections
This protocol illustrates the usefulness of the Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) mouse model to restrict EGFP-KASH2 expression to cerebellar Purkinje cells using Tg(PCP2-Cre) mice. In Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP/KASH2) offspring, the LacZ/V5 open reading frame is excised at P6 by the Cre recombinase thereby leading to the expression of EGFP-KASH2 specifically targeted to Purkinje cells (Figure 2A). As expected, EGFP-KASH2 is targeted to the nuclear envelope as indicated by the EGFP-positive rim-like pattern observed around the nucleus (Figure 2B). To maximize any physiological phenotype, it is important to ensure that EGFP-KASH2 is expressed in a majority of targeted cells by calculating the percentage of EGFP-KASH2 positive cells that are co-stained with a cell-specific antibody marker. In this example, EGFP-KASH2 expression was detected in more than 70% of Calbindin-positive Purkinje cells (Figure 2B). In these conditions, we did not observe any significant histological or behavioral phenotypes in 10 month-old Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP/KASH2) mice20. It is important to ensure that any morphological or behavioral phenotype is not due to ectopic expression of EGFP-KASH2 in an unintended cell type/tissue. To that respect, EGFP-KASH2 was not observed in the granule cell layer or the molecular layer of Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) cerebella (Figure 2B).
Finally, it is vital to confirm the extent of LINC complex disruption in cells expressing EGFP-KASH2. This can be achieved using high-quality anti-Nesprin antibodies to emphasize their displacement from the NE of cells expressing EGFP-KASH2. As shown in Figure 3, endogenous Nesprin2 is displaced from the nuclear envelope of Purkinje cells that express EGFP-KASH2 (Figure 3 top panel, yellow arrows) while Purkinje cells that do not express EGFP-KASH2 retain endogenous Nesprin2 at the nuclear envelope (Figure 3 top panel, white arrow). As expected, control littermates, which do not express Cre-recombinase, display Nesprin2 at the nuclear envelope of the whole Purkinje cell population (Figure 3 bottom white arrows). Several reports have now confirmed the expression of EGFP-KASH2, accompanied by the displacement of endogenous Nesprins, in additional tissues and cell types such as skeletal muscle fibers and cone photoreceptors19,21.
Figure 1. LINC complexes connect the nucleus to the cytoskeleton and are disrupted by the overexpression of EGFP-KASH2. (A) Depiction of LINC complexes that connect the interior of the nucleus to the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton. Note that SUN domains interact promiscuously with KASH domains from all Nesprins (Nesprins 1-4). (B) Overexpression of EGFP-KASH2 displaces endogenous Nesprins from the nuclear envelope to the ER, in a dominant negative fashion, thus disconnecting the nucleus from the surrounding cytoplasmic cytoskeleton.
Figure 2. Overexpression of EGFP-KASH2 specifically targeted to cerebellar Purkinje cells. (A) Breeding of Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) to Tg(PCP2-Cre) mice results in Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) offspring in which Cre recombinase is expressed specifically in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Upon expression (P6), Cre recombinase translocates into the nucleus where it excises the LacZ ORF and induces EGFP-KASH2 expression. (B) Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) mice specifically express EGFP-KASH2 in cerebellar Purkinje cells identified with Calbindin (colored in red). Note that both cerebellar granule neurons and interneurons of the molecular layer are negative for EGFP-KASH2 expression. Abbreviations: MoL: Molecular layer, PCL: Purkinje cell layer and GCL: Granule cell layer.
Figure 3. Disruption of endogenous LINC complexes in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Single confocal plane showing expression of EGFP-KASH2 that displaces endogenous Nesprin2 (colored in red) from the nuclear envelope of Purkinje cells (yellow arrows top). Note that Purkinje cells lacking EGFP-KASH2 expression maintain endogenous Nesprin2 at their nuclear envelope (white arrow top). In Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) control littermates, no EGFP signal is observed and Nesprin2 is detected at the nuclear envelope of all Purki
This protocol illustrates the usefulness of the Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) mouse model to restrict EGFP-KASH2 expression to cerebellar Purkinje cells using Tg(PCP2-Cre) mice. In Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP/KASH2) offspring, the LacZ/V5 open reading frame is excised at P6 by the Cre recombinase thereby leading to the expression of EGFP-KASH2 specifically targeted to Purkinje cells (Figure 2A). As expected, EGFP-KASH2 is targeted to the nuclear envelope as indicated by the EGFP-positive rim-like pattern observed around the nucleus (Figure 2B). To maximize any physiological phenotype, it is important to ensure that EGFP-KASH2 is expressed in a majority of targeted cells by calculating the percentage of EGFP-KASH2 positive cells that are co-stained with a cell-specific antibody marker. In this example, EGFP-KASH2 expression was detected in more than 70% of Calbindin-positive Purkinje cells (Figure 2B). In these conditions, we did not observe any significant histological or behavioral phenotypes in 10 month-old Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP/KASH2) mice20. It is important to ensure that any morphological or behavioral phenotype is not due to ectopic expression of EGFP-KASH2 in an unintended cell type/tissue. To that respect, EGFP-KASH2 was not observed in the granule cell layer or the molecular layer of Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) cerebella (Figure 2B).
Finally, it is vital to confirm the extent of LINC complex disruption in cells expressing EGFP-KASH2. This can be achieved using high-quality anti-Nesprin antibodies to emphasize their displacement from the NE of cells expressing EGFP-KASH2. As shown in Figure 3, endogenous Nesprin2 is displaced from the nuclear envelope of Purkinje cells that express EGFP-KASH2 (Figure 3 top panel, yellow arrows) while Purkinje cells that do not express EGFP-KASH2 retain endogenous Nesprin2 at the nuclear envelope (Figure 3 top panel, white arrow). As expected, control littermates, which do not express Cre-recombinase, display Nesprin2 at the nuclear envelope of the whole Purkinje cell population (Figure 3 bottom white arrows). Several reports have now confirmed the expression of EGFP-KASH2, accompanied by the displacement of endogenous Nesprins, in additional tissues and cell types such as skeletal muscle fibers and cone photoreceptors19,21.
Figure 1. LINC complexes connect the nucleus to the cytoskeleton and are disrupted by the overexpression of EGFP-KASH2. (A) Depiction of LINC complexes that connect the interior of the nucleus to the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton. Note that SUN domains interact promiscuously with KASH domains from all Nesprins (Nesprins 1-4). (B) Overexpression of EGFP-KASH2 displaces endogenous Nesprins from the nuclear envelope to the ER, in a dominant negative fashion, thus disconnecting the nucleus from the surrounding cytoplasmic cytoskeleton. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Overexpression of EGFP-KASH2 specifically targeted to cerebellar Purkinje cells. (A) Breeding of Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) to Tg(PCP2-Cre) mice results in Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) offspring in which Cre recombinase is expressed specifically in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Upon expression (P6), Cre recombinase translocates into the nucleus where it excises the LacZ ORF and induces EGFP-KASH2 expression. (B) Tg(PCP2CreCAG-EGFP-KASH2) mice specifically express EGFP-KASH2 in cerebellar Purkinje cells identified with Calbindin (colored in red). Note that both cerebellar granule neurons and interneurons of the molecular layer are negative for EGFP-KASH2 expression. Abbreviations: MoL: Molecular layer, PCL: Purkinje cell layer and GCL: Granule cell layer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Disruption of endogenous LINC complexes in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Single confocal plane showing expression of EGFP-KASH2 that displaces endogenous Nesprin2 (colored in red) from the nuclear envelope of Purkinje cells (yellow arrows top). Note that Purkinje cells lacking EGFP-KASH2 expression maintain endogenous Nesprin2 at their nuclear envelope (white arrow top). In Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) control littermates, no EGFP signal is observed and Nesprin2 is detected at the nuclear envelope of all Purkinje cells (white arrows bottom). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The most critical step to successfully study the role of LINC complexes in vivo using the Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) model is to identify a suitable Cre mouse line(s). Indeed, if Cre is active in other cell-types involved in similar pathways, it can complicate the interpretation of the results. Hence, it is important to examine nearby cells, as shown here in the molecular and granule cell layers of the cerebellum (Figure 2B). Likewise, to maximize any physiologically relevant phenotypes it is important to identify a Cre strain with widespread Cre expression across the cell type of interest. It is also vital to undertake an in-depth characterization of the expression pattern of LINC complex components during the development of the system of interest. Indeed, one drawback of the Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) mouse model is that it does not provide any information as to which Sun proteins or Nesprins variants are involved in the biological system under consideration. However, this issue can be overcome by undertaking a rigorous characterization at both the transcript and protein levels. In fact, such studies have been undertaken on several occasions which led to important findings about the role of specific LINC complex components during CNS development and homeostasis21,22.
Finally, while this protocol is focused on the use of fixed CNS tissues, Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) mice can be used to isolate and culture primary cells to study the effect of disrupting LINC complexes in vitro. Using this scheme, it is possible to isolate and purify primary cultures of EGFP-KASH2-positive cells for applications such as time-lapse video microscopy. This bypasses low transfection efficiencies or lentiviral production required for primary culture systems, such as neurons.
In summary, the Tg(CAG-LacZ/EGFP-KASH2) mice open up new and exciting possibilities to study the function of LINC complexes in vivo during embryonic and postnatal mammalian developmental processes in a wide variety of tissues and cell types to address basic cell biology questions.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank the staff of the Morphology and Imaging core, of the Molecular Genetics core (Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences) and of the Mouse Genetics Core at Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine. The authors are supported by the small grant program from The McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, the Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, the National Eye Institute (#R01EY022632 to D.H.), a National Eye Institute Center Core Grant (#P30EY002687) and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences.
Sucrose | Sigma Aldrich | S0389 | |
10x PBS | Gibco | 14200-075 | |
16% Paraformaldehyde Solution | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 15710 | |
OCT Compound | Tissue-Tek | 4583 | |
Adhesion Slides | StatLab | M1000W | |
Donkey Serum | Sigma Aldrich | D9663 | |
Triton X-100 | Sigma Aldrich | T9284 | |
ImmuEdge Pen | Vector Laboratories | H-4000 | |
Anti-Calbindin Antibody | Sigma Aldrich | C9848 | |
Anti-EGFP Antibody | Abcam | ab13970 | |
Anti-Nesprin2 Antibody | Previously described in Ref. 21 | ||
Fluorescent Mounting Media | Dako | S3023 | |
2-methyl butane | Sigma Aldrich | O3551 |